바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.2
Citation Share

The Influence of Choice Attributes on Choice Induced Preference Change

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2020, v.32 no.2, pp.189-195
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.2.005


& (2020). The Influence of Choice Attributes on Choice Induced Preference Change. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 32(2), 189-195, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.2.005
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Choice induced preference change (CIPC) is a phenomenon in which self-reported preference increases or decreases for chosen vs. rejected options, respectively. Some researchers argue that the mere act of choosing leads to preference changes, based on the observation of CIPC even after making a blind choice. We tested the hypothesis that CIPC occurs only after a preference-based choice, rather than any choice. During the experiment, participants first rated their preference for each face stimuli. Then, they were asked to make a choice between two faces that had been rated similarly. Two kinds of choice tasks were contrasted; preference-based choice vs. preference-excluded choice task. Next, participants rated their preference for each face for the second time. In addition, memory was tested at the end in order to examine whether the degree of CIPC differs for remembered or forgotten choices. As a result, CIPC was observed only in the preference-based choice condition. Our findings suggest that CIPC occurs only for choices that reflect subjective preference. Furthermore, CIPC was not influenced by memory which may be due to the usage of face stimuli which can be harder to verbalize or remember.

keywords
선택 후 선호도 변화, 인지부조화, 기억, 얼굴, 선호, 의사 결정, choice-induced preference change, cognitive dissonance, memory, face, preference, decision making

Reference

1.

Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.

2.

Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.

3.

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.

4.

Brehm, J. W., & Wicklund, R. A. (1970). Regret and dissonance reduction as a function of postdecision salience of dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 1-7.

5.

Chammat, M., El Karoui, I., Allali, S., Hagège, J., Lehongre, K., Hasboun, D., . . . Navarro, V. (2017). Cognitive dissonance resolution depends on episodic memory. Scientific Reports, 7, 41320.

6.

Chen, M. K., & Risen, J. L. (2010). How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 573-594.

7.

Coppin, G., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Porcherot, C., & Sander, D. (2010). I’m no longer torn after choice: How explicit choices implicitly shape preferences of odors. Psychological Science, 21, 489-493.

8.

Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261-279.

9.

Egan, L. C., Bloom, P., & Santos, L. R. (2010). Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 204-207.

10.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.

11.

Gerard, H. B., & White, G. L. (1983). Post-decisional reevaluation of choice alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 365-369.

12.

Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711-723.

13.

Izuma, K., Matsumoto, M., Murayama, K., Samejima, K., Sadato, N., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22014-22019.

14.

Izuma, K., & Murayama, K. (2013). Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: A critical methodological review. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 41.

15.

Johansson, P., Hall, L., & Chater, N. (2012). Preference change through choice. In R. Dolan & T. Sharot (Eds.), Neuroscience of preference and choice (pp. 121-141). London: Elsevier Academic Press.

16.

Kim, J. J., Andreasen, N. C., O'Leary, D. S., Wiser, A. K., Ponto, L. B., Watkins, G. L., & Hichwa, R. D. (1999). Direct comparison of the neural substrates of recognition memory for words and faces. Brain, 122, 1069-1083.

17.

Liang, L., Lin, L., Jin, L., Xie, D., & Li, M. (2018, August). SCUT-FBP5500: A diverse benchmark dataset for multi-paradigm facial beauty prediction. In 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (pp. 1598-1603). IEEE.

18.

Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Do amnesics exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction? The role of explicit memory and attention in attitude change. Psychological Science, 12, 135-140.

19.

Lisa DeBruine. (2017, December 4). Webmorph (Version v0.0.0.9001). Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1073696

20.

Nakamura, K., & Kawabata, H. (2013). I choose, therefore I like: Preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice. PloS One, 8, e72071.

21.

Salti, M., El Karoui, I., Maillet, M., & Naccache, L. (2014). Cognitive dissonance resolution is related to episodic memory. PloS One, 9, e108579.

22.

Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.

23.

Sharot, T., Velasquez, C. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice. Psychological Science, 21, 1231-1235.

24.

Sharot, T., Fleming, S. M., Yu, X., Koster, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Is choice-induced preference change long lasting?. Psychological Science, 23, 1123-1129.

25.

Voigt, K., Murawski, C., Speer, S., & Bode, S. (2019). Hard decisions shape the neural coding of preferences. Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 718-726.

26.

Vroom, V. H. (1966). Organizational choice: A study of pre-and postdecision processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1, 212-225.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy