바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0661
  • E-ISSN1229-0661
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.15 No.1

Citation Share

행복의 사회적 기능: 행복한 사람이 인기가 있나?

Social consequences of happiness: Are happy people popular?

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2009, v.15 no.1, pp.29-47
구재선 (충북대학교)
이아롱 (충북대학교)
서은국 (연세대학교)
구재선, 이아롱, & 서은국. (2009). 행복의 사회적 기능: 행복한 사람이 인기가 있나?. 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제, 15(1), 29-47.

초록

본 연구는 청소년의 행복과 또래 관계 형성의 관련성을 검토했다. 이를 위해서 총 241명의 중학교 1학년 학생들을 대상으로 급우 관계가 형성되기 전인 1학기 초에 행복 수준(주관적 안녕감, 심리적 안녕감, 자기존중감, 낙관주의)을 측정했다. 그리고 4개월이 지난 후 인기도와 사회적 행동을 자기보고 및 또래 평가 방식으로 측정했다. 학기 초 행복 수준과 그 이후 형성된 또래 관계의 관련성을 검토했을 때, 초기 행복 수준은 4개월 이후의 긍정적인 자기 지각 및 또래로부터의 사랑과 인정과 관련이 있었다. 구체적으로 학기 초에 행복했던 남학생은 또래로 부터 좋아하는 친구로 지명되었고, 초기 행복 수준이 높았던 여학생은 창의력이 있고 남을 돕는 친구로 지명되었다. 또한 행복한 남녀 청소년은 스스로를 사회성과 리더십이 높고 또래들에게 인기가 있다고 평가했다. 이러한 결과는 행복이 바람직하고 긍정적인 사회적 관계 형성과 관련이 있음을 시사한다.

keywords
행복, 주관적 안녕감, 심리적 안녕감, 인기도, 또래 관계, 긍정적 정서의 확장-축적 이론, happiness, subjective well-being, popularity, peer-relationship

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the social consequences of happiness. For this purpose, we examined the effect of happiness on the formation of adolescents' peer relationship. A total of 241 Korean junior high school students completed a happiness questionnaire consisting of subjective well-being, psychological well-being, self-esteem, and optimism at the beginning of the school year. Four months later, their popularity and social behaviors were measured using self-reports and peer-nomination measures. Happy male students were more likely to become nominated as a preferred friend by their peers at the end of the semester; happy females were evaluated by their peers as being more creative than others. Happy adolescents also viewed themselves as being more sociable, popular, and having more leadership than others. Overall, the findings imply that happiness also have positive social consequences in highly collectivist cultural settings, such as Korea.

keywords
행복, 주관적 안녕감, 심리적 안녕감, 인기도, 또래 관계, 긍정적 정서의 확장-축적 이론, happiness, subjective well-being, popularity, peer-relationship

참고문헌

1.

구재선, 김의철 (2006a). 한국인의 행복 경험에 대한 토착문화심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12, 77-100.

2.

구재선, 김의철 (2006b). 심리적 특성, 생활 경험, 행복의 통합적 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20, 1-18.

3.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석: 한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15, 19-39.

4.

서은국 (2004). 주관적 안녕감과 최근 연구 동향. 한국임상심리학회 추계학술대회 자료집, pp. 3-18. 11월 6일. 서울: 가톨릭대학교.

5.

이사라 (2001). 부모와 또래가 아동의 자아개념 발달에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단적 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

6.

이은경 (2005). 신경증과 외향성이 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향: 우울과 긍정적 정서의 중요성. 연세대학교 대학원 심리학과 석사학위논문.

7.

이주일, 정지원, 이정미 (2006). 미국거주 한인노인과 국내노인 간 행복감의 차이 및 행복감에 영향을 주는 요인의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12, 169-203.

8.

장휘숙 (2004). 청년심리학. 서울: 박영사.

9.

정선진 (2005). 또래괴롭힘에 관련된 아동의 사회적 행동특성, 부모-자녀관계 및 친구관계. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

10.

한유화, 정진경 (2007). 2요인 자아존중감 척도: 개인주의 및 집단주의 요인. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21, 117-131.

11.

Baldassare, M., Rosenfield, S., & Rook, K. S. (1984). The types of social relations predicting elderly well-being. Research on Aging, 6, 549-559.

12.

Baron, R. A., Rea, M. S., & Daniels, S. G. (1992). Effects of Indoor lighting(illuminance and spectral distribution) on the performance of cognitive tasks and interpersonal behavior: The potential mediating role of positive affect. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 1-33.

13.

Bell, P. (1978). Affective state, attraction, and affiliation: Misery loves happy company too. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 616-619.

14.

Berry, D. S., & Hansen, J. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 796-809.

15.

Bryant, B. K. (1983). Context of success: Affective aroused generosity. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 553-562.

16.

Burgess, K. B., Wojslawowicz, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Booth, C. L. (2003). The 'Extended Class Play" A longitudinal study of its factor structure, reliability, and validity. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tempa, FL.

17.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp.231-243). NY: Oxford University Press.

18.

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A crossage perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.

19.

Compton, W. C. (2005). Introduction to Positive Psychology. CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

20.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wong, M. M. (1991). The situational and personal correlates of happiness: a cross-national comparison. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Ed.), Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 193-212). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

21.

Cunningham, M. R. (1988). What do you do when you're happy or blue? Mood, expectancies, and behavioral interest. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 309-331

22.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

23.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. S., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life-scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

24.

Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 926-935.

25.

Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Asian Economic and Political Issues, Vol. 10 (pp. 1-25). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

26.

Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81-84.

27.

Diener, E., Smith, H., Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 130-141.

28.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276- 302.

29.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7-32.

30.

Doh, H. & Falbo, T. (1999). Social competence, maternal attentiveness, and over protectiveness: Only children in Korea. International Journal of Behavior Development, 23, 149-162.

31.

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319.

32.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.

33.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2005). Positive emotions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp.120-134). NY: Oxford University Press.

34.

Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1045-1062.

35.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13, 172-175.

36.

Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365-376.

37.

Harker, L., & Keltner, D. (2001). Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 112-124.

38.

Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206-1217.

39.

Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.

40.

Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M. S., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1413-1426.

41.

Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents' social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32, 435-441.

42.

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855.

43.

Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 357-364.

44.

Parker, J. G. & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: "Are low-accepted children at risk?" Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.

45.

Requena, F. (1995). Friendship and subjective well-being in Spain: A cross-national comparison with the United States. Social Indicators Research, 35, 271-288.

46.

Rimland, B. (1982). The altruism paradox. Psychological Reports, 51, 521-522.

47.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

48.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

49.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.

50.

Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life-Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063-1078.

51.

Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1062-1075.

52.

Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short homogenous version of the Marlowe-Crown Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.

53.

Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well-adjusted and well-liked or maladjusted and friendless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 165-176.

54.

Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333-354.

55.

Veenhoven, R. (1989). How Harmful is Happiness? Consequences of Enjoying Life or Not? Rotterdam, The Netherlands: University Press Rotterdam.

56.

Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제

논문 투고 OA 정책