- P-ISSN1229-0661
- E-ISSN1229-0661
- KCI
논문 상세
- 2024 (30권)
- 2023 (29권)
- 2022 (28권)
- 2021 (27권)
- 2020 (26권)
- 2019 (25권)
- 2018 (24권)
- 2017 (23권)
- 2016 (22권)
- 2015 (21권)
- 2014 (20권)
- 2013 (19권)
- 2012 (18권)
- 2011 (17권)
- 2010 (16권)
- 2009 (15권)
- 2008 (14권)
- 2007 (13권)
- 2006 (12권)
- 2005 (11권)
- 2004 (10권)
- 2003 (9권)
- 2002 (8권)
- 2001 (7권)
- 2000 (6권)
- 1999 (5권)
- 1998 (4권)
- 1997 (3권)
- 1995 (2권)
- 1994 (1권)
‘가족으로서의 국가’ 은유가 사회적 정의 판단에 미치는 영향
Are “strict fathers” harsher on those in need?: How priming nation-as-family metaphors affects judgement on social justice
초록
Lakoff(2002)의 가족으로서의 국가 은유(nation-as-family metaphor)에 따르면 미국의 보수주의와 진보주의의 도덕성은 각각 국가를 “엄격한 아버지(strict father)” 또는 “자애로운 부모(nurturant parents)”로 보는 서로 다른 가족 은유에 기반을 두고 있으며 보수주의와 진보주의 진영의 입장은 이러한 가족 은유의 가치와 연합되어 있다고 본다. 이 연구는 점화 기법을 사용하여 가족 은유가 실제로 경제적 어려움을 겪고 있는 사람들에 대한 판단에 영향을 미칠 수 있을지 살펴보았다. Lakoff가 언급한 “엄격한 아버지(strict father)”의 도덕성을 점화했을 경우에 비해 “자애로운 부모(nurturant parents)”의 도덕성을 점화한 경우에 참가자들은 사회 보장 프로그램을 필요로 하는 사람들의 성품을 좀 더 긍정적으로 평가하며 그들이 처한 경제적 어려움을 개인의 책임으로만 돌리지 않는 경향을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 보수주의와 진보주의적 태도와 관점을 구성하는 요체가 무엇인지 되짚어 보게 하며 특히 사회 정책의 결정 및 정치적 판단에 미칠 수 있는 상황적 요인의 역할에 대한 시사점을 제공한다.
- keywords
- Social cognition, Political psychology, Nation-as-family metaphor, Social justice, 사회인지, 정치심리학, 보수주의, 진보주의, 가족으로서의 국가 은유, 사회 정의
Abstract
Lakoff’s (2002) ‘nation-as-family’ metaphor suggests that conservatism and liberalism in the United States are based respectively on two different sets of morality, i.e., “strict father” morality and “nurturant parents” morality. He argues that values associated with respective metaphors and political principles derived from them tend to determine certain political attitudes and policy endorsement. Using the priming technique, this study attempted to examine whether “strict father” and “nurturant parents” morality are indeed what underlie very different positions conservatives and liberals take towards people in need. The results supported the Lakoff’s idea and demonstrated that, compared to priming “nurturant parents” morality, priming “strict father” morality actually led people to derogate character of those in need and to attribute more responsibility onto them for their economic predicament. This research leads us to reconsider what constitutes politically conservative and liberal attitudes and emphasizes the malleability of political attitudes.
- keywords
- Social cognition, Political psychology, Nation-as-family metaphor, Social justice, 사회인지, 정치심리학, 보수주의, 진보주의, 가족으로서의 국가 은유, 사회 정의
참고문헌
권보드래 (2001). 가족과 국가의 새로운 상상력: 신소설의 여성 주인공을 중심으로. 한국현대문학연구, 10, 27-51.
죠지 레이코프․로크리지연구소 (2006). 프레임 전쟁: 보수에 맞서는 진보의 성공전략. 창비.
Kim, U. (2002). Democracy, leadership, and political culture in Korea: With specific focus on political efficacy and trust. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8, 137-170.
Kim, U., & Park, Y. S. (2005). Trust, relationship, and civil society in Scandinavia and East Asia: Psychological, social, and cultural analysis. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11, 특집호, 133- 161.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Alterneyer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other “Authoritarian personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 30, pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
Carney, D., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interpersonal styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp.206-261). New York: Free Press.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
Erikson, R. S., Luttbeg, N. R., & Tedin, K. L. (1988). American public opinion (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillian.
Goodsell, C. T. (1988). The architecture of parliaments: Legislative houses and political culture, British Journal of Political Science, 18, 287-302.
Greenberg, J., Porteus, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski, T. (1995). Evidence of a terror management function of cultural icons: The effects of mortality salience on the inappropriate use of cherished cultural symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1221-1228.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory: II. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318.
Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one's worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 212-220.
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule; Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J. Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978-990.
McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681-690.
Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff & A. I. Rubin (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp.147-216). New York: Springer.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수