바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0661
  • E-ISSN1229-0661
  • KCI

이익충돌 상황에서 설득 메시지의 프레이밍 및반복에 따른 도덕적 의사결정 탐색

Exploring framing effect and repetition effect of the persuasive message on moral decision making in conflict of interest

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2018, v.24 no.4, pp.541-562
https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2018.11.24.4.541
성세연 (연세대학교)
정경미 (연세대학교)

초록

메시지 제시는 개인의 태도 및 의사결정 행동 변화를 설득하는 대표적인 방법으로, 실용성과 효과성 간 균형을 고려할 때 이익충돌 상황에서 발생 가능한 여러 문제에 대한 효율적인 해결 방안 중 하나이다. 메시지의 프레이밍과 반복은 메시지의 설득 효과에 영향을 주는 두 주요한 변인이나, 이를 이익충돌과 도덕적 의사결정에 적용하여 탐색한 연구는 부재한다. 본 연구에서는 도덕성 점화 설득 메시지의 프레이밍 유형과 도덕성을 점화하는 설득 메시지의 반복 횟수에 따른 사익추구행동의 차이가 있는지 검증하였다. 이를 위해, 대학생 63명(남: 35명, 여: 28명)을 메시지 프레이밍 유형에 따라 세 가지 조건(긍정적 프레이밍 조건, 부정적 프레이밍 조건, 비점화 조건)으로 무선할당한 뒤, 이익충돌 상황에서 가상의 파트너에게 자문을 하는 웹 기반 컴퓨터 실험을 통해 각 조건에서 도덕성 점화 설득 메시지를 4회 반복 제시하였다. 연구 결과, 메시지 반복 횟수와 메시지 프레이밍 유형 간 상호작용이 유의하지 않았으나, 메시지 프레이밍 유형의 주효과 및 반복 횟수의 주효과는 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 긍정적 프레이밍 집단이 비점화 집단에 비해 낮은 수준의 사익추구행동을 보였으며, 메시지 반복과 사익추구행동 간 U자 형태의 이차 함수 관계가 확인되었다. 이 같은 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 함의와 의의에 더불어 한계점 및 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 논의하였다.

keywords
Conflict of interest, Persuasive message, Framing effect, Repetition effect, Self-interested behavior., 이익충돌, 설득 메시지, 프레이밍 효과, 반복 효과, 사익추구행동

Abstract

Conflict of interest (COI) is one of the dominant circumstantial factors of moral corruption across various fields. Several management strategies have been proposed to prevent self-interested decision making in COIs. Among these strategies, message persuasion has been considered as a practical and effective approach. Prior studies have found that framing and repetition are two of the major factors in the persuasion effect of message. However, their effect on moral decision making in COI has not been well explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the differential effects of positively framed message and negatively framed message, and secondly, to investigate how the effectiveness of persuasive message changes through repetitive exposures. A total of 63 participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 framing conditions: positive framing, negative framing, and no-message condition. Prior to the on-line experiment involving a consultation task, differently framed persuasive message were presented to the participants. This process was repeated four times in a row. The results showed that participants with positive-framing message were less likely to provide self-interested consultation than participants in the no-message condition. Also, a U-shaped quadric relation between repetition and self-interest consultation was found. Implications and limitations are further discussed.

keywords
Conflict of interest, Persuasive message, Framing effect, Repetition effect, Self-interested behavior., 이익충돌, 설득 메시지, 프레이밍 효과, 반복 효과, 사익추구행동

참고문헌

1.

김남호, 정경미 (2017). 이익충돌 상황에서 공개가 사익추구행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 31(1), 23-39.

2.

김수빈, 김지혜, 정경미 (2016). 이익충돌 상황에서 공개가 자문행동에 주는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(1), 1-18.

3.

나현진 (2017). 이익충돌 상황에서 공개와 메시지 유형이 사익추구 행동에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

박흥식 (2008). 공직자 이해충돌(conflict of interest) 행위의 개선을 위한 연구. 한국행정학보, 42(3), 239-260.

5.

Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 263-273.

6.

Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D., Herrin, J., Vist, G. E., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., et al. (2011). Framing of health information messages. The Cochrane Library, 12, CD006777.

7.

Albert, S., & Dabbs Jr, J. M. (1970). Physical distance and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(3), 265-270.

8.

Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. (1990). Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3) 345-353.

9.

Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178-184.

10.

Baumert, A., Halmburger, A., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053-1068.

11.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286.

12.

Billi, J. E., Zideman, D. A., Eigel, B., Nolan, J. P., Montgomery, W. H., & Nadkarni, V. M. (2005). Conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2005 International Consensus Conference on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation, 67, 171-173.

13.

Brody, H. (2011). Clarifying conflict of interest. The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(1), 23-28.

14.

Broeders, R., Van Den Bos, K., Müller, P. A., & Ham, J. (2011). Should I save or should I not kill? How people solve moral dilemmas depends on which rule is most accessible. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 923-934.

15.

Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 330-341.

16.

Buda, R. (2003). The interactive effect of message framing, presentation order, and source credibility on recruitment practices. International Journal of Management, 20(2), 156-163.

17.

Buda, R., & Zhang, Y. (2000). Consumer product evaluation: The interactive effect of message framing, presentation order, and source credibility. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(4), 229-242.

18.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97-109.

19.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 3-12.

20.

Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1-25.

21.

Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2010). When sunlight fails to disinfect: Understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 836-857.

22.

Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 292-304

23.

Cao, F., Zhang, J., Song, L., Wang, S., Miao, D., & Peng, J. (2017). Framing effect in the trolley problem and footbridge dilemma: Number of saved lives matters. Psychological Reports, 120(1), 88-101.

24.

Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12(5), 926-931.

25.

Chang, C. T., & Chen, T. T. (2010). Guilt appeals in cause-related advertising: When does a guilt appeal backfire? Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 522-523.

26.

Chebat, J. C., Charlebois, M., & Gélinas-Chebat, C. (2001). What makes open vs. closed conclusion advertisements more persuasive? The moderating role of prior knowledge and involvement. Journal of Business Research, 53(2), 93-102.

27.

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.

28.

Church, B. K., & Kuang, X. (2009). Conflicts of interest, disclosure, and (costly) sanctions: Experimental evidence. The Journal of Legal Studies, 38(2), 505-532.

29.

Coleman, S. (2005). Conflict of interest and police: An unavoidable problem. Criminal Justice Ethics, 24(2), 3-11.

30.

Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1431-1451.

31.

Crystal, N. M. (1990). Disqualification of counsel for unrelated matter conflicts of interest. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 4, 273-315.

32.

DeRenzo, E. G. (2005). Conflict-of-interest policy at the National Institutes of Health: The pendulum swings wildly. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(2), 199-210.

33.

Eiser, J. R., Pahl, S., & Prins, Y. R. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self–other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 77-84.

34.

Elliott, K. C. (2008). Scientific judgment and the limits of conflict-of-interest policies. Accountability in Research, 15(1), 1-29.

35.

Fernandes, J. (2013). Effects of negative political advertising and message repetition on candidate evaluation. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 268-291.

36.

Forgas, J. P. (2007). When sad is better than happy: Negative affect can improve the quality and effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 513-528.

37.

Ganzach, Y., & Karsahi, N. (1995). Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment. Journal of Business Research, 32(1), 11-17.

38.

Ganzach, Y., & Schul, Y. (1995). The influence of quantity of information and goal framing on decision. Acta Psychologica, 89(1), 23-36.

39.

Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2010). Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 11-20.

40.

Gerver, D. (1969). Effects of grammaticalness, presentation rate, and message length on auditory short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(3), 203-208.

41.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

42.

Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 172-179.

43.

Gorn, G. J., & Goldberg, M. E. (1980). Children's responses to repetitive television commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 421-424.

44.

Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523.

45.

Grimm, P. F., Kohlberg, L., & White, S. H. (1968). Some relationships between conscience and attentional processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 239-252.

46.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

47.

Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 205-218.

48.

Koch, C., & Schmidt, C. (2010). Disclosing conflicts of interest - Do experience and reputation matter? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 95-107.

49.

Krugman, H. E. (1982). Why three exposures may be enough. Journal of Advertising Research, 12(6), 11-15.

50.

Kuvaas, B., & Selart, M. (2004). Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 198-207.

51.

Lemmens, T., & Singer, P. A. (1998). Bioethics for clinicians: 17. Conflict of interest in research, education and patient care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159(8), 960-965.

52.

Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 411-429.

53.

Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 76(2), 149-188.

54.

Lindsey, L. L. M., Yun, K. A., & Hill, J. B. (2007). Anticipated guilt as motivation to help unknown others: An examination of empathy as a moderator. Communication Research, 34(4), 468-480.

55.

Lo, B., & Ott, C. (2013). What is the enemy in CME, conflicts of interest or bias?. Journal of American Medical Association, 310(10), 1019- 1020.

56.

Lo, B., Wolf, L. E., & Berkeley, A. (2000). Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 343(22), 1616-1620.

57.

Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2006). “We can do this the easy way or the hard way”: Negative emotions, self-regulation, and the law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 183-206.

58.

Loewenstein, G., Sah, S., & Cain, D. M. (2012). The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. Journal of American Medical Association, 307(7), 669-670.

59.

McDonald, C. (1996). Advertising reach and frequency: Maximizing advertising results through effective frequency. New York and Linclonwood, IL: Association of National Advertiser and NTC Business Books.

60.

Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510.

61.

Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 853-866.

62.

Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 189-202.

63.

Moore, D. A., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 37-53.

64.

Moorman, M., & Van Den Putte, B. (2008). The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages. Addictive Behaviors, 33(10), 1267-1275.

65.

Naples, M. J. (1979). Effective frequency: The relationship between frequency and advertising effectiveness. New York: Association of National Advertisers.

66.

Nordgren, L. F., & Chou, E. Y. (2011). The push and pull of temptation: The bidirectional influence of temptation on self-control. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1386-1390.

67.

Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371-382.

68.

Nowell, C., & Laufer, D. (1997). Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 28(1), 3-12.

69.

Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement in self‐reported and peer‐nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 133-144.

70.

O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, 329-344.

71.

O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296-316.

72.

Pelletier, L. G., & Sharp, E. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 210-217.

73.

Peng, J., Xiao, W., Yang, Y., Wu, S., & Miao, D. (2014). The impact of trait anxiety on self‐frame and decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(1), 11-19.

74.

Perlis, R. H., Perlis, C. S., Wu, Y., Hwang, C., Joseph, M., & Nierenberg, A. A. (2005). Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(10), 1957-1960.

75.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915-1926.

76.

Praxmarer, S. (2011). Message strength and persuasion when consumers imagine product usage. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 225-231.

77.

Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229-255.

78.

Resnik, D. B. (1998). Conflicts of interest in science. Perspectives on Science, 6(4), 381-408.

79.

Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2002). Conflict of interest and the university. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 9(1), 45-64.

80.

Rice, D. H., Kelting, K., & Lutz, R. J. (2012). Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements: The influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 249-259.

81.

Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S202-S220.

82.

Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3-19.

83.

Ruff, K. (2015). Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: What progress has been made?. Environmental Health, 14(1), 45-53.

84.

Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psychological Science, 25(2), 575-584.

85.

Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M. (2015). Advertising repetition: A meta-analysis on effective frequency in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 415-428.

86.

Schneider, G. (2010). Economics and conflict. In: Robert A Denemark (ed.) The International Studies Encyclopedia. Malden, MA.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1284-1300.

87.

Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803-809.

88.

Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 164-168.

89.

Shi, J., & Smith, S. W. (2016). The effects of fear appeal message repetition on perceived threat, perceived efficacy, and behavioral intention in the extended parallel process model. Health Communication, 31(3), 275-286.

90.

Smith, R. (1998). Beyond conflict of interest: Transparency is the key. British Medical Journal, 317(7154), 291.

91.

Swift, S., Rizk, D., & Lose, G. (2017). Conflict of interest: What is it, and how do journals manage it in the publication process?. International Urogynecology Journal, 28(7), 969-970.

92.

Taha, A. E., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2015). Disclosures about disclosures: Can conflict of interest warnings be ma.de more effective? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12(2), 236-251.

93.

Tansley, D. P., Jome, L. M., Haase, R. F., & Martens, M. P. (2007). The effects of message framing on college students' career decision making. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(3), 301-316.

94.

Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 573-573.

95.

Toll, B. A., Rojewski, A. M., Duncan, L. R., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., Fucito, L. M., Boyer, J. L., et al. (2014). “Quitting smoking will benefit your health”: The evolution of clinician messaging to encourage tobacco cessation. Clinical Cancer Research, 20(2), 301-309.

96.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.

97.

Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). Conscience without cognition: The effects of subconscious priming on ethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 723-742.

98.

Williams, R. L. (2003). Conflict of interest. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 223-225.

99.

Yoon, C., Laurent, G., Fung, H. H., Gonzalez, R., Gutchess, A. H., Hedden, T., et al. (2005). Cognition, persuasion and decision making in older consumers. Marketing Letters, 16(3-4), 429-441.

100.

Zajonc, R. B., Markus, H., & Wilson, W. R. (1974). Exposure effects and associative learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(3), 248-263.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제