바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.4

Citation Share

Latent Profile Analysis of Meta-Awareness of Gender Discrimination Among Korean Young Adults: Group Differences in Gender Role Conflict, Sense of Distance from the Opposite Sex, and Support for Gender Discrimination Issues

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2020, v.26 no.4, pp.351-378
https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2020.11.26.4.351


& (2020). Latent Profile Analysis of Meta-Awareness of Gender Discrimination Among Korean Young Adults: Group Differences in Gender Role Conflict, Sense of Distance from the Opposite Sex, and Support for Gender Discrimination Issues. Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 26(4), 351-378, https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2020.11.26.4.351

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify the latent classes of meta-awareness of gender discrimination among Korean young adults using Latent Profile Analysis based on ‘perceived ambivalence toward men among women’, ‘perceived ambivalent sexism among men’, ‘perceived gender(reverse-) discrimination in Korea’. After identifying the latent classes, the difference between gender role conflict, sense of distance from the opposite sex, and support for gender discrimination issues were explored among the classified groups. As a result, 3 latent classes among women and 2 latent classes among men were identified. Latent classes among women were named ‘women with low sensitivity of sexism’, ‘women with high sensitivity of sexism’ and ‘women against sexism’ and latent classes among men were named ‘men with perception of gender equality’, ‘men with perception of reverse discrimination’. Types with higher levels of meta-awareness of gender discrimination were related with higher gender role conflict and higher sense of distance from the opposite sex. Among women, types with higher levels of meta-awareness of gender discrimination perceived higher levels of gender discrimination and showed more support for gender discrimination issues while among men, types with higher levels of meta-perception of gender discrimination only perceived higher levels of reverse discrimination. Based on the present findings, implications about the severe gender conflict among Korean young adults are further discussed in the article.

keywords
Awareness of Gender Discrimination, Gender Discrimination, Social Conflict, Latent Profile Analysis, 성차별 메타-인식(meta-awareness of gender discrimination), 성별갈등, 잠재프로파일 분석

Reference

1.

김규철 (2019. 6. 4.) 국민 10명 중 8명 ‘사회 갈등 심하다’ “분배방식․가치관 변화 요구 높다”. 내일신문.http://www.naeil.com/news_view/?id_art=315197.

2.

김수아, 이예슬 (2017). 온라인 커뮤니티와 남성-약자 서사 구축. 한국여성학, 33(3), 67-107.

3.

김은석 (2017). 일-가정 양립 유형화 및 일-가정 양립 촉진적 자기의 가정→일 양립에 대한 자기 효과와 상대방 효과. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.

4.

마경희, 조영주. 문희영, 이은아, 이순미 (2018). 성불평등과 남성의 삶의 질에 관한 연구 (한국여성정책연구원 연구보고서 No.27). 서울: 한국여성정책연구원.

5.

박무늬, 민혜영, 장태훈 (2019). 청년 세대(20~ 30) 남성의 여성 혐오 인식에 관한 연구: 강남역 살인사건을 중심으로. 커뮤니케이션학 연구, 27(1), 85-111.

6.

서경원, 김혜숙 (2008). 대상의 성차별주의 정도와 여성에 대한 긍정 감정 지각이 적대적 성차별주의 남성과 온정적 성차별주의 남성에 대한 태도에 미치는 매개효과. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 2008(1), 478-479.

7.

안상수, 백영주, 김인순, 김혜숙, 김진실 (2007). 한국형 다면성별의식검사 개발 및 타당화 연구 (한국여성정책연구원 연구보고서 No.17). 서울: 한국여성정책연구원.

8.

우성범 (2017). 한국 남성규범척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 고려대학교 박사학위논문.

9.

오보영, 이상희 (2017). 인터넷 여성운동 커뮤니티 이용자들의 성적 정체감 및 자아정체감 변화에 대한 탐색적 연구: CQR-M분석을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 22 (3), 391-416.

10.

유계숙, 조선아, 강민지 (2017). 여성혐오 개념화와 관련요인에 관한 연구-서울시 남자 대학생을 중심으로-. 한국가족복지학, 22 (3), 401-429.

11.

윤병해, 고재홍 (2006). 양가적 성차별 태도에 따른 성폭력 피해자에 대한 비난 차이. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11(1), 1-19.

12.

이수연, 김인순, 김지현, 김진아 (2012). 한국형 남성 성역할 갈등 검사 개발 및 타당화. 여성연구, 82(1), 5-33.

13.

이슬기 (2019). 남성규범과 새로운 아버지 신념에 따른 아버지 유형과 공동양육의 관계. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.

14.

정윤경 (2004). 부부갈등이 성인초기 자녀의 이성과의 친밀감에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

15.

하문선, 김지현 (2017). 남성 성역할갈등의 남녀 보편화 가능성 검증: 남녀 간 잠재평균분석과 등가제약모형의 적용. 상담학연구, 18(3), 1-22

16.

한국여성정책연구원 (2019). 한국여성정책연구원, 한국사회의 성평등 현안 인식조사 결과 발표.

17.

Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the Unseen: Attention to Daily Encounters With Sexism as Way to Reduce Sexist Beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), 227-242.

18.

Berke, D., Reidy, D., Miller, J. and Zeichner, A. (2017). Take it like a man: Gender-threatened men’s experience of gender role discrepancy, emotion activation, and pain tolerance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(1), 62-69.

19.

Cameron, J. E. (2002). Social Identity, Modern Sexism, and Perceptions of Personal and Group Discrimination by Women and Men. Sex Roles, 45(11-12), 743-766.

20.

Finchilescu, G. (2010). Intergroup Anxiety in Interracial Interaction: The Role of Prejudice and Metastereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 66(2), 334-351.

21.

Glick, P. and Whitehead, J. (2010). Hostility Toward Men and the Perceived Stability of Male Dominance. Social Psychology, 41(3), 177-185.

22.

Glick, P., & Fiske, T. S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.

23.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.

24.

Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., Manganelli, A., Pek, J., Huang, L., Sakalli-Uğurlu, N., Castro, Y., D’Avila Pereira, M., Willemsen, T., Brunner, A., Six-Materna, I. and Wells, R. (2004). Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 713-728.

25.

Gul, P. and Kupfer, T. (2019). Benevolent Sexism and Mate Preferences: Why Do Women Prefer Benevolent Men Despite Recognizing That They Can Be Undermining?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 146-161.

26.

Hammond, M., Overall, N. and Cross, E. (2016). Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partners’ benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 214-238.

27.

Matera, C., Verde, S. D., Mergingolo, P., (2015). I Like You More if I Think You Like Me: The Effect of Metastereotypes on Attitudes Toward People With Deafness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 381-394.

28.

Nguyen, H. and Ryan, A. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314-1334.

29.

Putra, I. (2014). The role of ingroup and outgroup metaprejudice in predicting prejudice and identity undermining. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(4), 574-579.

30.

Rogers, L., Yang, R., Way, N., Weinberg, S. and Bennet, A. (2019). “We’re Supposed to Look Like Girls, But Act Like Boys”: Adolescent Girls’ Adherence to Masculinity Norms. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1-16.

31.

Rudman, L. and Fetterolf, J. (2014). How accurate are metaperceptions of sexism? Evidence for the illusion of antagonism between hostile and benevolent sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(3), pp.275-285.

32.

Swim, J., Aikin, K., Hall, W. and Hunter, B. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), pp.199-214.

33.

Vezzali, L. (2017). Valence matters: Positive meta-stereotypes and interethnic interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(2), 247-261.

34.

Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How Do Individuals Expect to Be Viewed by Members of Lower Status Groups? Content and Implications of Meta-Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917-937.

35.

Wakefield, J., Hopkins, N. and Greenwood, R. (2013). Meta-stereotypes, Social Image and Help Seeking: Dependency-Related Meta- stereotypes Reduce Help-Seeking Behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(5), 363-372.

36.

Weis, A., Redford, L., Zucker, A. and Ratliff, K. (2018). Feminist Identity, Attitudes Toward Feminist Prototypes, and Willingness to Intervene in Everyday Sexist Events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(3), 279-290.

37.

Wheeler, S. and Petty, R. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 797-826.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

e-Submission OA Policy