바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Asymmetric Effects of Cast Shadow Directions on Visual Search

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2008, v.20 no.4, pp.265-283
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2008.20.4.004


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this study, the effects of cast shadow directions on visual search were investigated. Rensink and Cavanagh(2004) reported that search based on cast shadow can have a significant influence on the speed of visual search. Here we manipulated directions of cast shadow and arrangement positions, to test whether there is a preferred direction of illumination in the processing of cast shadow. Target and distracters had identical cast shadow directions, and target differed from distracters only in the orientation of cast shadow. In Experiment 1, two-dimensional shapes were used consisting of vertically oriented rectangles and quadrilateral, and in Experiment 2, three-dimensional cylinders were adopted. Results show that search was consistently slower for the normal ground arrangement than for the ceiling arrangement across the conditions. In addition, cast shadow directions had asymmetric effects on search time, depending on the object types. When the stimuli were arranged on the ground, search for the left-lit condition tended to be slower than for the right-lit condition in Experiment 1, whereas search for the left-lit condition tended to be faster than for the right-lit condition in Experiment 2. These findings imply that the processing of right-side cast shadow seems to be more influenced by objects' 2- or 3-dimensional property than that of left-side one. It is suggested possible differential processing related with the fact that human perceives as more familiar scene left-lit world where the shadow is cast on right-side.

keywords
visual search, cast shadow, illumination, 3-D object perception, 시각 탐색, 그림자, 조명방향

Reference

1.

Arnheim,R., (1954) 미술과 시지각 , 홍성사

2.

Brainard, D. H. ., (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision

3.

B thoff, H. H. , (1988) Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading, Journal of Optical Society America A

4.

Cavanagh, P. , (1989) Shape From Shadows, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

5.

Donner, K., (2003) Visual reaction time: neural conditions for the equivalence of stimulus area and contrast, Vision Research

6.

Efron, R. , (1996) Spatial Nonuniformities in Visual Search, Brain and Cognition

7.

Enns, J. T., (1990) Influence of scene-based properties on visual search, Science

8.

He, A. , (1992) Surface versus features in visual search, Nature

9.

Kleffner, D. A., (1992) On the perception of shape from shading, Perception & Psychophysics

10.

Pelli,D.G., (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, Spatial Vision

11.

Rensink, R. , (2004) The influence of cast shadows on visual search, Perception

12.

Sun, J. Y. , (1996) Preattentive Percetion of Elementary Three-Dimensional Shapes, Vision Research

13.

Sun, J. Y. , (1998) Where is the Sun? , Nature Neuroscience

14.

Todd, J. T., (1996) Effects of Changing Viewing Conditions on the Perceived Structure of Smoothly Curved Surfaces, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

15.

Treisman,A., (1986) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Scientific American

16.

Treisman, A., (1980) A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology

17.

Treisman, A., (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychological Review

18.

Vassilev, A., (2002) On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation, Vision Research

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology