바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Relationship between Transgressive Behaviors of Humanity and Moral Anger in Korean Culture

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2005, v.11 no.3, pp.1-21


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Many researches have argued the most important dimension of perception or evaluation of person is morality and competence in Korean culture. This study was to investigate the cultural characteristics of the criteria of personhood. Two studies were conducted to investigate the criteria used to evaluate person by qualitative approach and the differences of evaluation of wrongdoer who violates interpersonal norm or individual autonomy by experimental method. In addition, anger as emotional response to wrongdoer is conceptualized in terms of moral and self-conscious emotion. Expression of anger is less an outpouring of emotion and more a culturally regulated and normative mode of managing and putting into practice our society's system of rights and obligations - its moral code. According to results of qualitative data by interview and focus group interview, the most important criteria used to evaluate personhood was interpersonal concern, esp, expectation and norm. The results of experiment revealed that violation of interpersonal norm domain evoked angrier towards violator than autonomy domain. The subjects ascribed more blame and responsibility to interpersonal norm violator than autonomy keeper. Also function of behavior inhibition of anger was higher in interpersonal norm domain than autonomy domain.

keywords
moral anger, personhood, interpersonal norm, autonomy, self-conscious emotion, 사람됨, 도덕성, 도덕적 정서, 화, 대인관계 윤리, 자율

Reference

1.

(2002) 한국아동과 청소년의 도덕적 정서 죄책감을 중심으로,

2.

(2004) 자의식적 정서로서 부끄러움의 분석,

3.

(2003) 도덕적 판단과 도덕적 감정의 관계 도덕적 self로서의 염치와 도덕적 감정으로서의 부끄러움 분석 ,

4.

(2000) 토착심리학과 문화심리학의 과학적 토대,

5.

(2004) 한국 사회와 사람에 대한 사회적 표상과 신뢰 청소년과 성인의 지각을 통해 본 토착심리 분석,

6.

(1998) 유가사상의 사회철학적 재조명, 고려대학교 출판부

7.

(1990) 대인평가차원의 이원모형,

8.

(2003) 한국인 이해의 개념틀, 나남출판

9.

(2000) 한국인 심리학, 중앙대학교 출판부

10.

(2000) 체면의 심리적 구조,

11.

(2004) 한국사회에서의 사람 판단의 준거 된 사람과 난 사람의 평가를 중심으로 사회 및 성격,

12.

(1999) On becoming a person.,

13.

(2002) The person in social psychology, Psychology Press

14.

(2002) Lured by the spirit to the ethical life,

15.

(2002) The essence of women's moral perspectives in anger expression situations,

16.

(2000) Emotion, regulation, and moral development. ,

17.

(1993) or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

18.

(1991) implications for cognition,

19.

(1997) Understanding the role of worldviews in morality,

20.

(1993) Understanding oughts by assessing moral reasoning or moral emotions The MIT Press,

21.

(1991) Thinking through Cultures, Harvard University Press

22.

(1993) The future of psychology,

23.

(1999) The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes(community, autonomy, divinity).,

24.

(1991) Thinking through Cultures, Harvard University Press

25.

(1993) The future of psychology,

26.

(1995) Emotion. In R. Harre, & P. Stearns (Eds.) Discursive psychology in practice , Sage Publications

27.

(1992) Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

28.

(1996) Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

29.

(1998) The social being in social psychology The handbook of social psychology, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc

30.

(1983b) Domains and categories in social cognition The relationship between social and cognitive development,

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues