College students' implicit theory of Korean creativity and creative environment

본 연구에서는 우리나라 대학생들이 생각하는 한국적 창의성 개념과 대학생들이 창의성을 어느 정도 발휘하고 있는지, 그리고 창의성의 저해요인은 무엇이라고 생각하는지 조사하였다. 더불어 한국의 창의적 인물의 가정환경과 학교환경에 대한 대학생들의 암묵적 생각을 탐색하였다. 한국적 창의성은 융통/응용/변환, 독창성, 꾸준한 노력, 탈고정관념, 예술 심미 선호, 온고지신을 포함하였다. 대학생들은 스스로 창의성을 보통 이상(M=3.2)으로 발휘하고 있다고 생각하고 있었으며 전공별로는 예체능계열이, 성별에 있어서는 남학생들이 상대적으로 창의성을 더 많이 발휘하고 있다고 생각하였다. 창의성 저해요인으로는 입시위주의 교육제도와 융통성 없는 사회풍토를 포함하는 사회제도적 요인들을 가장 많이 지적하였다. 대학생들은 한국의 창의적인 인물들이 가난한 가정환경과 부유한 가정환경이라는 극단적인 경제 환경을 가졌을 것이라고 응답하였다. 다음으로 화목하고 민주적이고 자유로우며 지지받는 가정 분위기를 가졌다고 응답하였다. 학교생활 및 환경에 대해서는 창의적 인물들이 학교교육 및 학교생활에 부적응했다고 하는 응답이 가장 많았다. 그리고 교우관계는 긍정적이었다는 응답이 많았다. 본 연구는 한국적 창의성 모형을 제안하기 위한 탐색자료로 활용될 것이다.

keywords: 한국적 창의성, 암묵적 이론, 가정환경, 학교환경, Korean creativity, implicit theory, home environment, school environment

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the college students' implicit theory of Korean creativity. This study deals with the degree to which the students exploit the creativity, and the obstacles for them to exploit the creativity. Another purpose of this study is to explore their implicit knowledge of Korean creative environments. The results are as follows. The implicit knowledge of Korean creativity could be characterized by the following key words: ‘flexibility’, ‘application’, ‘transformation’, ‘originality’, ‘perseverance’, ‘not being stereotyped’, ‘esthetic flavor’ and ‘understanding-new-by-exploring-old’. Students thought themselves to be more or less creative. Students in art and physical education, and male students estimated themselves more creative than other discipline and female. They thought that socio-institutional factors such as educational system focused on the college entrance test are the most serious obstacles against creativity. About half of the students thought the creative persons would have been raised in poor family whereas other students thought differently. The home environment of the creative person was thought to be characterized by the words such as democratic, free and encouraging. Creative persons were thought to be maladaptive school life, but good at peer relations. This study will be used as a pioneer research which suggest a model of Korean creativity.

keywords: 한국적 창의성, 암묵적 이론, 가정환경, 학교환경, Korean creativity, implicit theory, home environment, school environment

참고문헌

성은현, (2006a) 동서양의 창의성 차이 고찰: 창의적 문화와 환경, 성격, 사고, 산물을 중심으로, 영재와 영재교육

성은현, (2006b) 문화와 창의성. 인하대학교 국제학술대회 발표 자료집 - 아시아 교육의 기적-가정, 학교 그리고 문화적 맥락에서의 아동 발달,

성은현 ; 류형선 ; 하주현 ; 이정규 ; 한순미 ; 한윤영, (2007) 한국 대학생이 생각하는 한국과 미국의 암묵적 창의성에 대한 비교 연구, 영재교육연구

정범모, (2001) 창의력이란 - 그 실체와 육성, 교육과학사

한순미, (2005) 창의성-사람/환경/전략, 학지사

한순미, (2006) 환경은 창의성을 어떻게 조형하는가, 영재와 영재교육

Amabile,T., (1983) The social psychology of creativity, Springer-Verlag

Amabile,T., (1989) Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity, Creative Education Foundation Press

Amabile,T., (1996) Creativity in context, Westview Press

10.

Barron,F., (1969) Creative person and creative process, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

11.

Chao,R.K., (1993) East and West: Concepts of the self as reflected in mothers' reports of their child-rearing, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles,

12.

Cropley,A.J., (1990) Creativity and mental health in everyday life, Creativity Research Journal

13.

Cropley,A.J., (2006) Creativity: A Social approach, Roeper Review

14.

Csikszentmihalyi,M., (1996) Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, Harper Collins

15.

Csikszentmihalyi,M., (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity, Cambridge University Press

16.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1993) Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure, Cambridge University Press

17.

Dacey,J., (1992) The nurturing parent: How to raise creative, loving, responsible children, Simon & Schuster

18.

Dacey, J., (1998) Understanding creativity, Jossey-Bass Publishers

19.

Eysenck,H., (1995) Genius: The natural history of creativity, Cambridge University?Press

20.

Gardner,H., (1991) The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach, Basic Books

21.

Gardner,H., (1993) Creating Minds, Harper Collins

22.

Gardner,H., (1997) Extraordinary minds, Basic Books

23.

Gardner, K., (1990) Family adaptability, cohesion, and creativity, Creativity Research Journal

24.

Grzeskowiak,S., (1996) Curiosity in small children and the childrearing style of their mothers. In Fostering the growth of high ability: European perspectives, Ablex

25.

Hallman,R., (1967) Techniques of creative teaching, Journal of Creative Behavior

26.

Harrington., D. M., (1987) Testing aspects of Carl Rogers' theory of creative environment: Child rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents in : Journal of Personality and Social Psychological perspective, Cambridge University Press

27.

Hills,T.W., (1987) Children in the fast lane: Implications for early childhood policy and practice, Early Childhood Reasearch Quarterly

28.

Hyson. M. C., (1991) Ingredients of parental pressure in early childhood, Jorunal of Applicated Developmental Psychology

29.

John-Steiner,B., (1997) Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking, Oxford University Press

30.

Kim,K.H, (2005) Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American Education, Creativity Research Journal

31.

Kim,J., (1995) The relationship of creativity measurres to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students, Educational and Psychological Measurment

32.

Kyung Hee Kim, (2005) Learning From Each Other: Creativity in East Asian and American Education, Creative Research Journal

33.

Lee,J.K., (1999) Historic factors affecting educational administration in Korean higher education, Higher Educational Review

34.

Lubart, T. I., (1999) Creativity across cultures, Cambridge University Press

35.

Lubart,T., (2003) Psychologie de la Creativit, Armand Colin

36.

Ludwig,A.M, (1992) Culture and creativity, American Journal of Psychotherapy

37.

MacKinnon,D, (1961) The nature and nurture of creative potential, Psychologist

38.

Maduro,R, (1976) Artistic creativity in a Brahmin painter community. Research monograph 14. Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California

39.

Mendecka,G., (1996) of parents and development of creativity. In Fostering the growth of high ability: European perspectives, Ablex

40.

Michel,M., (1991) Mother-child relationships and creativity, Creativity Research Journal

41.

Millward, L. J., (2002) Role expectations as constraints to innovation: The case of female managers, Research Journal

42.

Moustakis,C.E., (1977) Creative life, Van Nostrand

43.

Ng,A.K., (2003) A Cultural Model of Creative and Conforming Behavior, Creativity Research Journal

44.

Rhodes,M., (1961) An analysis of creativity, Phi Delta Kappan

45.

Rudowicz,E., (2003) Creativity and culture: a two way interaction, Scandinavian Joutnal of Educational Research

46.

Sternberg,R.J., (1985) Implicit Theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology

47.

Sternberg, R., (1997) Are cognitive styles still in style, American Psychologist

48.

Sternberg,R.J., (2002) The Creativity Conundrum, Psychology Press

49.

Sternberg,R, (1995) the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, Free Press

50.

Sternberg, R. J, (1996) Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, July, July.

51.

Torrance,E.P, (1968) A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity, Gifted child Quarterly

52.

Torrance,E.P, (1995) The beyonders. In Why fly? A philosophy of creativity, Ablex

53.

Treffinger, D. J., (1968) Teacher's attitudes toward creativity, Journal of Creative Behavior

54.

Walberg, H., (1979) Childhood eminence, Journal of Creative Behavior

55.

Walberg, H., (1979) Childhood eminence, Journal of Creative Behavior

56.

Winner,E, (1996) Gifted children:Myths and realities, Basic Books

57.

Wollam,J., (1992) Equality versus excellence: The South Korean dilemma in gifted education, Roeper Review

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.14 No.특집

한국적 창의성과 창의적 환경에 대한 대학생들의 암묵적 이론

College students' implicit theory of Korean creativity and creative environment

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제