바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.15 No.3
Citation Share

The Change of Traffic Accident Risk Degree by Driving Stress Coping Patterns

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2009, v.15 no.3, pp.431-446


& (2009). The Change of Traffic Accident Risk Degree by Driving Stress Coping Patterns. Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 15(3), 431-446.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study was intended to validate and develop the driving stress coping behavior scale. In a preliminary investigation, literature studies on the driving stress and open questionnaire were administered and examined in four regions in Korea. As a result, 64 items driving stress questionnaire were developed. In the study, this Driving Stress Coping Behavior Scale(DS-CBS) was examined to 372 drivers located seven regions in Korea. The factors analysis revealed 2 meaningful factors[(Good Coping: GC), (Bad Coping: BC) with 24 items. When internal consistency for each 2 factor was calculated, all sub-scale revealed a satisfactory level of Cronbach's α. Also, correlations with Driver Coping Questionnaire(DCQ) and risk driving behaviors(speed driving, drunken driving, traffic violation, offence accident, defence accident) supported consistently validity of the Driving Stress Coping Behavior Scale(DS-CBS). Also, We investigated the influences of ‘Good Coping’, ‘Bad Coping’ consisting of driving stress coping behavior, on traffic accidents risk. As a result, ‘Good Coping’ and ‘Bad Coping’ influenced traffic accidents risk. ‘Good Coping’ had decreased effects, the other side ‘Bad Coping’ had increased effects on traffic accidents risk(TARI).

keywords
driving stress, coping behavior, traffic accident, path analysis, 운전스트레스, 대처방식, 교통사고, 모형분석

Reference

1.

김계수 (2005). Amos 구조방정식 모형분석. 서울: SPSS 아카데미

2.

김렬, 성도경, 이환범, 송건섭, 조태경, 이수창 (2005). 통계분석의 이해 및 활용. 대명

3.

김원표 (2005). SPSS 통계분석강의. 사회와 통계

4.

김의철, 박영신 (1997). 스트레스 경험, 대처와 적응 결과: 토착심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회: 건강, 2(1), 96-126.

5.

유일영 (1994). 경로분석: 원인관계분석을 위한 통계방법. 간호학탐구, 3(1), 210-219.

6.

이순열, 이순철 (2008). 운전 스트레스 척도(Driving Stress Scale: DSS)의 개발과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(3), 21- 40.

7.

이은희 (2004). 대학생들이 경험하는 생활스트레스와 우울: 공변량 구조모형을 통한 대처방식의 조절효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(1), 25-52.

8.

이은희, 이주희 (2001). 교사의 직무스트레스와 심리적 적응과의 관계: 문제 중심적 대처방식, 정서 중심적 대처방식의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6(1), 145-175.

9.

정영찬, 강주희, 전상현, 변동구 (2002). SPSS를 활용한 통계분석. 크라운.

10.

홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거, 한국심리학회: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

11.

Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. A. (1987). Does coping helps? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 337-348.

12.

Conway, V. J., & Terry, D. J. (1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 1-7.

13.

Forsythe, C. J., & Compas, B. E. (1987). Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 473-485.

14.

Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. M. (1989). Dimensions of driver stress, Ergonomics, 32(6), 585-602.

15.

Gulian, E., Debney, L. M., Glendon, A. I., & Davies, D. R. (1989). Coping with driver stress, in F. McGuigan, W. E. Sime and J. M. Wallace (Eds), Stress and tension Contral (Vol 3), New York, 173-186.

16.

Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1997). The relationship between traffic congestion, driver stress and direct versus indirect coping behaviours. Ergonomics, 40(3), 348-361.

17.

Hoare, P. N. (2001). Stress Traits and Coping Styles as Predictors of Stress Symptoms in Bus Driver. University of Southern Queensland.

18.

Kontogiannis, T. (2006). Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviors and traffic accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 913-924.

19.

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1991). Coping and emotion. In A. Monat & Lazarus(Eds), Stress and coping; An anthology(pp.207-227). New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

20.

Lee, S. Y., Lee, S. C., & Song, H. W. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Traffic Accident Risk Index(TARI), International Conference on Asia Pacific Psychology (ICAPP).

21.

Matthews, G., Desmond, P. A., Joyner, L., Carcacy, B., & Gilliland, K. (1996). Validation of the driver stress inventory and driver coping questionnaire. International Conference on Traffic and Transport.

22.

Matthews, G., Dorn, L, & Glendon, A. I. (1991). Personality correlates of dirver stress, Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 535-549.

23.

Richard, P. (2005). Driver Behaviour within the Ambulance Service: An Exploratory Study on Driver Behaviour, Collision Attribution & Driving-Related Stressors. Cranfield University.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

e-Submission OA Policy