바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.16 No.3

Citation Share

The Influence of an Elder's Role of Counselor on Counseling Result -Reporting Style Based on ‘Story Making Methods’-

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2010, v.16 no.3, pp.311-329

(2010). The Influence of an Elder's Role of Counselor on Counseling Result -Reporting Style Based on ‘Story Making Methods’-. Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 16(3), 311-329.

Abstract

It is necessarily for a counselor's role to vary according to the cultures. While an autonomy is stressed in Western horizontal society, sociability is emphasized in Korea which is a vertical authoritarian society. What is more, a lot of people look to a counselor for elder's role as a teacher or a fosterer as well as a therapist. The two basic framework of Reality Dynamic Counseling which has been developed as a counseling approach for Korean are ‘presentization for problem’ and ‘elder's role of a counselor’. An elder's role of counselor showed in real counseling case is illustrated by ‘narrative methods’ in this study. The ‘story making methods’ as one of qualitative research methods is more useful than a protocol method which has been used in studying counseling case, because it has conciseness for original text of dialogs and commentary for counseling process. The seven characteristics of Reality Dynamic Counseling such as grasping the real cause, understanding mind,, emphasizing interpersonal factor, emphasis on role, utilizing confrontation, emphasizing the relationship of parent-child, and facilitating sociability are reflected in such an elder's role of counselor.

keywords
sociability, a fosterer, an elder's role, story making methods, Reality Dynamic Counseling, 사회성, 양육자, 어른역할, 이야기 방식, 현실역동 상담

Reference

1.

이정모 (1995a). 과학적 심리학의 이론적 기초: 기본 가정의 분석. 한국심리학회 1995년도 심리학 동계연구세미나 초록. 197-249.

2.

이정모 (2009). 인지과학: 학문 간 융합의 원리와 응용. 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부.

3.

장성숙 (2000). 현실역동상담: 한국인의 특성에 적합한 상담 접근. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 12(2), 17-32.

4.

장성숙 (2002). 우리 문화에서의 상담자상. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 14(3), 547-561.

5.

장성숙 (2007). 가족주의와 현실역동상담의 일체적 관점. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(3), 523-537.

6.

장성숙 (2008). 상담사례 과정에 반영된 현실역동상담의 특성. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 349-365.

7.

장성숙 (2009). 문제 직시가 상담성과에 미치는 영향 -‘이야기 방식’에 기초한 보고 형태- 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 15(4), 529- 546.

8.

최봉영 (2005). 한국사회의 차별과 억압. 서울: 지식산업사.

9.

최봉영 (2007). 한국어로써 존재를 경험하는 방식. 아시아철학자대회, 6월 1-2일, 성균관대학교.

10.

최봉영 (2007). 한국사회의 가족문화. 제 8회 현실역동상담 학술세미나 가족주의와 상담의 관계, 7-22.

11.

한규석 (2009). 사회심리학의 이해(개정판). 서울: 학지사.

12.

한규석, 최상진 (2008). 마음의 연구와 심리학: 마음의 문화심리적 분석에 바탕한 심리의 작용 틀. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27, 281- 307.

13.

Bickhard, M. H. (1992). Myths of science: Misconceptions of science in contemporary psychology. Theory & Psychology 2, 3, 321- 337.

14.

Corey, G. (2009). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (8th Ed.). Cengage Learning. 조현춘, 조현재, 문지혜, 이근배 홍영근 공역 (2010). 심리 상담과 치료의 이론과 실제. 시그마프레스.

15.

Fauconnier. G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexties. Chiho Publishing House. 김동환, 최영호 공역(2009). 우리는 어떻게 생각하는가. 고양: 지호.

16.

Friedberg, R. D., & McClue, J. M. (2002). Clinical practice of cognitive therapy with children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Lieblich, A., McAdams, D. P., & Josselson, R. (Eds.) (2004). Healing plots: The narrative basis of psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

18.

O'hear, A. (1989). An introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford Univer. Press. 신중섭 역. 현대의 과학철학 입문. 서광사.

19.

Pedersen, P. (1991). Multiculturalism as a generic approach to counseling. (Special Issue on Multiculturalism as a fourth force in counseling). Journal of Counseling and Deveopment, 70, 6-12.

20.

Salmon. W. C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In. P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (pp.3-219)

21.

Shweder, R. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

22.

Schmidt, F. J. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 2. 115-129.

23.

Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1999). Counseling th culturally different: theory and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

e-Submission OA Policy