We tried to develop the school violence prevention program which focuses on the bystanders. In the context of school violence, most students are bystanders. They can either reinforce the violence or stop the violence. We hypothesized that the students who know their own temperament dimensions such as novelty seeking, harm avoidance, and reward dependence (Cloninger, 1994) will show more tendencies to defend victims from school violence when they learned the methods to prevent school violence in accordance to their temperament dimensions. 351 Korean middle school students participated the 4 sessions of school violence prevention program. The students completed the questionnaires to identify their own behavior in school violence situations. In the experimental group(temperament group), students learned the methods to help the victims that suits with their own temperaments. Whereas, the comparison group just attend the class regardless of their temperaments. Both groups showed significant increase in the trend of defending the victims. However, the temperament group showed more tendency to protect/defend the victims than the comparison group when they faced with school violence. These results show that students can learn the methods of defending victims from school violence more easily by knowing their own temperament dimensions, and can be the prepared and the effective defenders.
곽금주 (2008). 한국사회와 교육적 성취: 성취의 그늘, 한국 청소년의 일탈행동: 한국의 왕따와 예방프로그램. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 14(1), 255-272.
권재기 (2011). 집단따돌림 피해경험의 발달양상과 내면화, 외현화 문제행동의 변화-잠재계층 성장분석 (LCGA), 다집단 성장혼합모형 (GMM) 을 이용한 종단연구. 한국아동복지학, 34, 96-127.
권재기 (2014). 초등학생의 집단따돌림 역할자 분석-잠재프로파일 탐색, 특성예측 및 종단적 변화양상 분석. 한국아동복지학, 45, 191-227.
교육부 (2014). 2015년 2차 학교폭력 실태조사 결과 보도자료 (2015년 12월 1일).
김현주 (2003). 집단 따돌림에서의 동조집단 유형화 연구. 청소년복지연구, 5(2), 103- 118.
민병배, 오현숙, 이주영 (2007). 기질 및 성격검사 매뉴얼. 서울:(주) 마음사랑.
박영신, 김의철 (2001). 학교폭력과 인간관계 및 청소년의 심리 행동특성. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 7(1), 63-89.
삼성생명공익재단 사회정신건강연구소 (2005). 한 번 더 생각해봐 프로그램. 서울: 교육과학사.
서울대학교 발달심리연구소 (2005). 시우보우 프로그램.
서울대학교 발달심리연구소 (2005). 헬핑 프로그램.
양계민, 정현희 (1999). 학교폭력이 청소년의 심리적 적응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 5(2), 91-104.
양야기, 이정숙 (2009). 학교폭력예방 프로그램이 중학생의 학교폭력태도, 분노 및 공격성에 미치는 효과. 정신간호학회지, 18(4), 369-378.
오해영, 김호영 (2005). 중학생 집단따돌림 예발 프로그램의 효과에 관한 연구. 미래청소년학회지, 2(1), 47-59.
오현숙, 민병배 (2004). 기질 및 성격검사 청소년용 매뉴얼. 서울:(주) 마음사랑.
윤성우, 이영호 (2007). 집단 따돌림 방관자에 대한 또래지지프로그램의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(2), 271-292.
윤초희, 박상근, 신인수 (2014). 국내 학교폭력 예방 프로그램의 효과에 관한 메타분석. 아시아교육연구, 15(1), 189-215.
이상균 (1999). 학교내의 또래폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
이은경, 유나현, 전주연, 이기학 (2004). 개인심리적 특성이 집단따돌림에 대한 동조성향에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 265-266.
이자영, 남숙경, 이미경, 이지희, 이상민 (2009). Rosenberg 의 자아존중감 척도: 문항수준 타당도분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(1), 173-189.
장금순 (2005). 민속놀이를 활용한 초등학생 학교폭력 예방 프로그램 개발 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
전병제 (1974). 자아개념 측정에 관한 연구. 연세논총. 11(1), 107-130.
청소년 폭력 예방재단 (2012). 2011 년도 전국학교폭력 실태조사 연구. 서울: 청소년폭력예방재단.
홍혜영 (1995). 완벽주의 성향, 자기효능감, 우울과의 관계연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
Andreou, E., Didaskalou, E., & Vlachou, A. (2008). Outcomes of a curriculum‐based anti-bullying intervention program on students' attitudes and behavior. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 13(4), 235-248.
Bennett-Levy, J. (2006). Therapist skills: A cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34(1), 57-78.
Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1999). Goodness of fit: Clinical applications from infancy through adult life. Psychology Press.
Cloninger, C. R. (1994). Temperament and personality. Current opinion in neurobiology, 4(2), 266-273.
Committee for Children, Seattle, WA. (1989). Second Step: A Violence-Prevention Curriculum. Grades 1-3, Teacher's Guide. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Farrington, D., & Ttofi, M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 5(6), 1-148.
Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., Vernberg, E. M., Nelson, J. M., Dill, E. J., Little, T. D., & Sargent, J. A. (2009). A cluster randomized controlled trial of child‐focused psychiatric consultation and a school systems‐focused intervention to reduce aggression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 607-616.
Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V. S., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the steps to respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 479-491.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive behavior, 33(5), 467-476.
Kurcinka, M. S. (1991). Raising your spirited child: A guide for parents whose child is more. Harper Collins.
Lynn Hawkins, D., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social development, 10(4), 512-527.
McClowry, S. G. (1998). The science and art of using temperament as the basis for intervention. School Psychology Review, 27(4), 551-563.
McClowry, S. G. (2003). Your child's unique temperament: Insights and strategies for responsive parenting. Research Press.
McClowry, S. G., Snow, D. L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Rodriguez, E. T. (2010). Testing the efficacy of INSIGHTS on student disruptive behavior, classroom management, and student competence in inner city primary grades. School mental health, 2(1), 23-35.
Negi R, Aleem S. (2014). Temperament and character in victims of school bullying. Andhra Pradesh Journal of Psychological Medicine, 15(1), 50-54.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 687-703.
O'Connell, P. A. U. L., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of adolescence, 22(4), 437-452.
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental psychology, 24(6), 807-814.
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47-65.
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(3), 315-340.
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. The journal of social psychology, 131(5), 615-627.
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(9), 677-688.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Self-esteem Scale (SE). Princeton University Press
Ross, S. W., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Bully prevention in positive behavior support. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 747-759.
Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective Relations Among Victimization, Rejection, Friendlessness, and Children's Self‐and Peer‐Perceptions. Child Development, 76(6), 1161- 1171.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 465-487.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Voeten, M., & Sinisammal, M. (2004). Targeting the group as a whole: The Finnish anti-bullying intervention: Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671.
Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). Australian school children's self appraisal of interpersonal relations: The bullying experience. Child psychiatry and human development, 23(4), 273-282.
Turecki, S., & Tonner, L. (1989). The difficult child. New York: Bantam Books.