바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Qualitative Research of Job turnover and Stay, Based on Job Embeddedness

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2018, v.24 no.2, pp.221-250
https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2018.5.24.2.221



Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the causes of turnover, the causes of stay, and the effects of turnover of college graduates with early careers, based on the concept of job embeddedness and their stances. For this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 college graduates with early careers and the interviews were analyzed with phenomenological analytic research. The result of the study shows that the cause of turnover intention includes fit and link which are components of job embeddedness. More specifically, turnover intention of the interviewee is affected by fit which includes whether their ability and talent are used properly and whether their vision and culture fit well those of their organization, also affected by link which includes the formal or informal mutual relationship with coworkers and superiors. Stay intention, on the other hand, includes fit which contains satisfaction about work and organization, long-term career management. Stay intention also includes sacrifice which are anxiety about uncertain future and satisfaction about being employed. As an aspect of the effect of turnover, the satisfaction and fulfillment about work which are experienced after turnover by the interviewees and the satisfaction about coworkers and the team in which the interviewees are included offset the negative effect of turnover. The result also shows that organization should consider their workers’ satisfaction about the first work, their amicable relationship, and turnover cost, to improve working and living standard of colleges graduates with early careers and to prevent them from turnover.

keywords
직무배태성, 대졸 초기경력자, 이직요인, 잔류요인, 이직효과, 질적 연구, ob embeddedness, college graduates with early career, turnover causes, stay causes, turnover effects, qualitative research

Reference

1.

고영복 (2000). 사회학사전, 서울: 사회문화연구소.

2.

권수현 (2016). 대졸 초기경력자의 이직에 따른 효용개선효과 분석. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

금재호 (2007). 청년실업의 현황과 원인 및 대책, 숭실대학교 사회과학연구원 사회과학논총, 9, 27-54.

4.

김소영, 장원섭, 김민영 (2007). 대졸 초기경력자의 조직적응 요인들과 심리사회적, 구조적, 학습경험적 요인들 간의 정준상관 분석연구. 직업교육연구, 26(3), 141-164.

5.

김은석 (2014). 청년근로자의 직무만족이 자발적 이직에 미치는 영향, 진로교육연구 27(3), 47-64.

6.

김은석, 정철영 (2010). 청년근로자의 일반적 특성과 직무만족이 이직결정에 미치는 영향. 진로교육연구, 23(3), 107-122.

7.

김종욱 (2017). 그토록 원하던 첫직장을 스스로 빠르게 빠져나가는 이유는?, 월간노동리뷰 151, 22-35.

8.

김한용 (2010). 중소기업 핵심종업원의 이직 결정 및 억제 요인 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

9.

나인강 (2005). 직무만족, 이직의도 및 이직행위의 관계에 대한 패널자료분석. 대한경영학회지, 18(2), 509-530.

10.

남재량 (2006). 청년실업의 동태적 특성과 정책 시사점. 노동리뷰, 4, 22-33.

11.

박경규, 이기은 (2004). 조직에 대한 직무배태성과 이직의도간의 관계. 경영학 연구, 33(5), 1423-1440.

12.

박태정 (2013), 베이비부머 세대들의 삶을 통해 본 일과 은퇴의 경험적 의미에 대한 연구, 노동정책연구, 13(3), 29-57.

13.

엄동욱 (2008). 대졸 신입사원의 조기퇴사 실태와 원인: 기업 인적자원관리(HRM)에의 시사점을 중심으로. 직업능력개발연구, 8, 237-260.

14.

이기리 (2003). 자발적 이직의 결정요인에 관한 연구: Job embeddedness와 이직용이성을 중심으로. 서강대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

이병희 (2002). 노동시장 이행초기 경험의 지속성에 관한 연구. 노동정책연구, 2(1), 1- 18.

16.

이영민, 연경진 (2007). 정보통신 업종 대졸 초기경력자의 이직의도와 이직행동 결정요인 분석. 기업교육연구, 11(1), 59-77.

17.

이영민, 임정연 (2010). 대졸 초기 경력자의 자발적 이직 결정요인 및 효과분석. 기업교육과 인재연구. 12(1). 129-153.

18.

이종현, 신강현, 백승근, 허창구 (2014). 이직연구에서 직무배태성 개념의 유효성- 메타분석 연구. 한국심리학회지:산업 및 조직, 27(4), 743-782.

19.

임해진 (2016). 대졸 초기경력자의 조기퇴사 경험에 대한 연구. 숙명여자대학교 여성인적자원개발대학원 석사학위논문.

20.

장서영, 장원섭 (2008). 대졸 초기경력자의 조직적응에 관한 질적 연구: 이직고려사유와 이에 대한 대응실태를 중심으로. Andragogy Today, 11(3), 105-138.

21.

장원섭, 김소영, 김민영, 김근호 (2007). 대졸 초기경력자의 직장 적응 실태에 관한 조사연구. 직업교육연구, 26(3), 141-165.

22.

정성석, 이기훈 (2008). 2단계 로지스틱 회귀모형을 이용한 직무만족도와 이직행동에 관한 연구 - 대졸자 직업이동 경로조사 자료를 중심으로. 한국통계학회논문집, 15(6), 859-873.

23.

주휘정 (2012). 신규대졸자의 직장적응 곤란 유형별 영향요인 분석. HRD 연구, 14(2), 73-93.

24.

탁진국 (2007). 개인-직무 부합의 선행변인과 이직의도와의 관계: 신입사원을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20(4), 459- 473.

25.

한국경영자총협회 (2016). 2016년 신입사원 채용실태 조사)

26.

한국고용정보원 (2012). 2007년 대졸자 직업이동 경로조사 3차년도.

27.

한국고용정보원 (2016). 2016 통계로 본 노동동향.

28.

Abii, F. E., Ogula, D. N., & Rose, J. M.(2013). Effects of Individual and Organizational Factors on the Turnover Intentions of Information Technology Professionals. International Journal of Management, 30(2), 740-756.

29.

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.

30.

Avanzi, L., Fraccaroli, F., Sarchielli, G., Ullrich, J. & van Dick, R. (2014). “Staying or leaving: a combined social identity and social exchange approach to predicting employee turnover intentions”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 272-289.

31.

Babalola, MT., Stouten, J., & Euwema, M. (2016), Frequent Change and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 311-322.

32.

Bartunek, J. M., Ferris, E. J., Huang, Z., & Walsh, I. J. (2008). The development of a process model of collective turnover. Human Relations, 61(1), 5-38.

33.

Bertelli, A. M. (2007). Determinants of bureaucratic turnover intention: Evidence from the department of the treasury. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 235-258.

34.

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Marmier, V. (2016). The curvilinear effect of work engagement on employees' turnover intentions. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 150-155.

35.

Chen, H., Ford, DL., Kalyanaram, G., & Bhagat, RS. (2012). Boundary conditions for turnover intentions: exploratory evidence from China, Jordan, Turkey, and the United States. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(4), 846-866.

36.

Cho, Y. J., & Lewis, G. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 4-23.

37.

Cho, Y. J. & Song, H. J. (2017). Determinants of Turnover Intention of Social Workers: Effects of Emotional Labor and Organizational Trust. Public Personnel Management, 46(1), 41-65.

38.

Cohen, G., Blake, R. S., & Goodman, D. (2016). Does Turnover Intention Matter? Evaluating the Usefulness of Turnover Intention Rate as a Predictor of Actual Turnover Rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 240-263.

39.

Condrey, S. E. (2005). Handbook of human resource management in government (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

40.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). 질적 연구방법론: 다섯 가지 접근. (조흥식 외 역). 서울: 학지사. (원전은 2007에 출판).

41.

Currivan, D. B. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 495-524.

42.

Dole, C. & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). The impact of various factors on the personality, job satisfaction and turnover intentions of professional accountants. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(4), 234-245.

43.

Earl, J. K., Minbashian, A., Sukijjakhamin, A., & Bright, J. E. H. (2011). Career decision status as a predictor of resignation behavior five years later. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 248-252.

44.

Felps, W., Mitchell, T., Hekman, D., Lee, T., Holtom, B., & Harman, W. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers' job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 545-561.

45.

Flint, D., Haley, L. M. and McNally, J. J. (2013). “Individual and organizational determinants of turnover intent”, Personnel Review, 42(5), 552-572.

46.

Gaertner, S. (1999). Structural determinants of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover models. Human Resources Management Review, 9(4), 479-493.

47.

Gius, M. (2014). The impact of job mobility on earnings: using occupational and industrial classifications to identify job changes. International Review of Applied Economics, 28(2), 181-190.

48.

Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488.

49.

Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 109-120.

50.

Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W., (1995). Employee Turnover, Cincinnati: South/Western.

51.

Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). Reviewing Employee Turnover: Focusing on Proximal Withdrawal States and an Expanded Criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 831-858.

52.

Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P., (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530-545.

53.

Jung, C. S. (2010). Predicting Organizational Actual Turnover Rates in the U.S. Federal Government. International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 297-317.

54.

Kwon, HW. (2017). A Social Embeddedness Perspective on Turnover Intention: The Role of Informal Networks and Social Identity Evidence From South Korea. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 263-287.

55.

Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An Alternative Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover. The Academy of Management Review. 19(1), 51-89.

56.

Lee, T. W., Hom, P. W., Eberly, M. B., Marion B., Li, J. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2017). On The Next Decade of Research in Voluntary. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 201- 221.

57.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985a). Effective Evaluation(4th ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publication.

58.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985b). Naturakistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

59.

Lu, C. Q., Sun, J. W., & Du, D. Y. (2016). The Relationships Between Employability, Emotional Exhaustion, and Turnover Intention: The Moderation of Perceived Career Opportunity. Journal of Career Development, 43(1), 37-51.

60.

Mauno, S., De Cuyper, N., Kinnunen, U., Ruokolainen, M., Rantanen, J., & Mäkikangas, A. (2015). The prospective effects of work–family conflict and enrichment on job exhaustion and turnover intentions: comparing long-term temporary vs. permanent workers across three waves. Work & Stress, 29(1), 75-94.

61.

Mayan, M. J., (2009). Introduction to the Essentials of Qualitative Inquiry: Thinking About, Designing, and Executing Rigorous Qualitative Inquiry, Journal of Qualitative Research, 2009, 3-73.

62.

McMillan, A., Chen, H., Richard, OC., & Bhuian, SN. (2012). A mediation model of task conflict in vertical dyads Linking organizational culture, subordinate values, and subordinate outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(3), 307-332.

63.

Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., & Baharom, M. N. R. (2015). Linking person-job fit, person- organization fit, employee engagement and turnover intention: A three-step conceptual model. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 313-320.

64.

Meier, K. J., & Hicklin, A. (2008). Employee turnover and organizational performance: Testing a hypothesis from classical public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 573-590.

65.

Michal B., Corine B., (2013). “Performance and turnover intentions: a social exchange perspective”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(5), 511-531.

66.

Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.

67.

Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2015). Event system theory: An event- oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515-537.

68.

Moustakas, C. (1994.). Phenomenological research methods. Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.

69.

Moynihan, D. P., & Landuyt, N. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 120-143.

70.

Mueller, C. W., Boyer, E. M., Price, J. L., & Iverson, R. D. (1994). Employee Attachment and Noncoercive Conditions of Work: The Case of Dental Hygienists, Work & Occupations, 21(2), 179-212.

71.

Neumark, D. (2002). Youth Labor Markets in the United States: Shopping Around vs. Staying Put. The Review of economics and statistics, 84(3), 462-482.

72.

Price, J. L. (2001). Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover. International Journal of Manpower, 22(7), 600-624.

73.

Rahim, A., & Cosby, D. M. (2015). A model of workplace incivility, job burnout, turnover intentions, and job performance. Journal of Management Development, 35(10), 1255-1265.

74.

Stewart, A. J., & Diebold, J. (2017). Turnover at the Top: Investigating Performance-Turnover Sensitivity among Nonprofit Organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(4), 741-764.

75.

Sturges, J., & Guest, D. (2010). Don't leave me this way! A qualitative study of influences on the organisational commitment and turnover intentions of graduates early in their career. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 29(4), 447-462.

76.

Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2014). Prior and future withdrawal and performance; A meta-analysis of their relations in panel studies. In Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 225-236.

77.

Tanova, C., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). “Using Job Embeddedness Factors to Explain Voluntary Turnover in Four European Countries,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1553-1568.

78.

van Manen, M. (1990). Beyond Assumptions: Shifting the Limits of Action Research. Theory Into Practice, 29(3), 152-157.

79.

Zimmerman, R. D., & Darnold, T. C., (2009) “The impact of job performance on employee turnover intentions and the voluntary turnover process: A meta‐analysis and path model”, Personnel Review, 38(2), 142-158.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues