바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The difference of cultural emotions in unfair situation in Korea, China, Japan, and the U.S.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2018, v.24 no.2, pp.251-272
https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2018.5.24.2.251


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

There could be different ways of perception, emotions, and behaviors facing on unfair situation according to the culture background by which people have been affected. We investigated whether definition, feelings, and behaviors in 4 countries (Korea, China, Japan, and the US) would differ in terms of unfair situations. We further examined the relationship between new self-construal model (subjectivity- objectivity-autonomy model) and behaviors resulted from unfair situations. Three hundred seventeen participants (87 Koreans, 71 Chinese, 80 Japanese, and 79 Americans) took part in this research. We found that all countries defined unfair situation as “having a disadvantage or blame that one did not done by him or her” with the highest percentage, but there was a different percentage according to countries. Next, Chinese felt disappointment or betray from the situations highly while others expressed anger with the largest portion. In the area of behaviors, three countries in Asia answered “no behaviors” with the highest percentage while Americans mostly responded “direct expressions”. In terms of self-construal model, subjective self was high in Chinese and Koreans while autonomy was high in Chinese and American. Japanese showed objective self with the highest. Implications and future research are discussed.

keywords
억울, 문화적 정서, 대처, 자기관, 주체성-대상성-자율성 모델, ‘Eogul’, cultural emotion, self-construal, coping, subjectivity-objectivity-autonomy model

Reference

1.

김경민, 박동건 (2011). 개인주의 집단주의와 조직 공정성에 대한 인식이 조직 내 구성원의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 17(4), 395- 413.

2.

김정운 (2001). 관계적 정서와 문화적 정서: 정서의 문화심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 20(2), 389-407.

3.

김효창 (2010). 자살: 문화심리학적 관점에서의 조망. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 16(2), 165-178.

4.

남기숙, 조선미, 이훈진 (2006). 한국어 단어를 기초로 한 수치심 척도의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25(4), 1063- 1085.

5.

류승아 (2010). 자아존중감과 문화적 성향과의 관계 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 169-183.

6.

민성길 (1989). 홧병의 개념에 대한 연구. 신경정신의학, 28(4), 604-616.

7.

서신화, 이수현, 한 민 (2013). 억울에 대한 사회적 표상 연구. 미발표 논문.

8.

서신화, 허태균, 한 민 (2016). 억울 경험의 과정과 특성에 대한 실증 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(4), 643-674.

9.

이누미야 요시유키 (2009). 주체성-대상성 자기와 긍정적 환상의 관계에 관한 한일비교 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 115- 146.

10.

이누미야 요시유키, 김윤주 (2006). 긍정적 환상의 한일비교: 주체성 자기와 대상성 자기에 의한 설명. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(4), 19-34.

11.

이누미야 요시유키, 한 민, 이주희, 이다인, 김소혜 (2007). 주체성-대상성-자율성 자기 척도의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 17-34.

12.

이시형 (1977). 홧병에 대한 연구. 고의, 1(2), 63-69.

13.

이시형, 조소연, 이성희 (1989). 울홧병으로서의 홧병 형성 기전. 고의, 12, 151-156.

14.

조선영, 이누미야, 김재신, 최일호 (2005). 한국과 일본에서 상호독립적-상호협조적 자기관이 대인불안에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감 공적자기의식의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(4), 49- 60.

15.

조수진, 이재은 (2015). 문화콘텐츠 개발을 위한 한, 중, 일 대학생들 간의 정서차이에 관한 연구: ‘수줍음’과 ‘친밀감’ 중심으로. 문화산업연구, 15(1), 57-64.

16.

조홍건 (1991). 스트레스병과 화병의 한방치료. 서울: 열린책들.

17.

최상진 (2000). 한국인 심리학. 서울: 중앙대학교 출판부.

18.

최상진, 이요행 (1995). 한국인 화병의 심리학적 개념화 시도. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표 논문집, 1호, 327-338.

19.

한 민, 이누미야 요시유키, 김소혜, 장웨이 (2009). 새로운 문화-자기관 이론의 국가간 비교연구: 한국, 중국, 일본 대학생들의 자기관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 49- 66.

20.

한 민 (2012). 한국인의 문화적 자기관(한국인 마음지도 연구자료 중). 미발표 논문.

21.

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed, Text Revision). Washington,DC:Author.

22.

Aubrey, S. (2009). A cross-cultural discussion of Japan and South Korea and how differences are manifested in the ESL/EFL classroom. Asian Social Science, 5, 34-39.

23.

Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.

24.

Averill, J. R. (1985). The social construction of emotion: With special reference to love. In K. J. Gergen & K. E. Davis(Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp.89-109). New York: Springer.

25.

Beckman-Brito, K. (2003). Classroom Etiquette: A cross-cultural study of classroom behaviors. Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 10, 17-34.

26.

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. MA: Harvard University Press.

27.

Buck, R. (1988). Human motivation and emotion (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

28.

Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92-100.

29.

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.

30.

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 386-396.

31.

Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In J. Cole(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

32.

Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839-852.

33.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.

35.

Han, M., Kim, H., & Inumiya, Y. (2016). Differed self within collectivist culture: Introducing and alternative self-construal theory. Studies in Asian Social Science, 3, 37-53.

36.

Harre, R. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford, England: Balckwell.

37.

Harre, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.

38.

Kagan, J. (2007). What is Emotion: History, measures, and meanings. New Haven: Yale University Press.

39.

Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. M. (1994). Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence. Washington D. C: American Psychological Association.

40.

Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39, 124-129.

41.

Lee, Y. J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Emotional display rules of Japanese and Koreans. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 82, 415-423.

42.

Leung, T., & Kim, M. S. (1997). A revised self construal scale. Unpublished manuscript. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu.

43.

Levine, T. R., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., Shearman, S. … Ohashi, R. (2003). Self-Construal Scales Lack Validity. Human Communication Research, 29, 210-252.

44.

Lutz, C. (1982). The domain of emotion words on Ifaluk. American Ethnologist, 9, 113-128.

45.

Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

46.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

47.

Mauro, R., Sato, K., & Tucker, J. (1992). The role of appraisal in human emotions: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 301-317.

48.

Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variation in emotion: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 170-204.

49.

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici(Eds.), Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3-69.

50.

Shachter, S. (1971). Emotion, obesity, and crime. New York: Academic Press.

51.

Shweder, R. A. (1993). The cultural psychology of the emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp.417- 431). New York: Guilford.

52.

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.

53.

Tomkins, S. S. (1984). Affect theory. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman(Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 163-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

54.

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman(Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp.41-133). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.

55.

Traindis, H. C. (1994). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

56.

Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Emotion, language, and cultural scripts. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus(Eds.), Emotion and culture (pp.133-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

57.

Wierzbicka, A. (1995). Emotion and facial expression: A semantic perspective. Culture and Psychology, 1, 227-258.

58.

Zabinsky, B., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Affective synthesis of the other through the self: A new look at empathy. Pater presented at the 3rd International Conference on Dialogical Self, Warsaw, Poland, Aug. 28.

59.

大坊 郁夫, 上出 寛子, 村澤 博人, 趙 鏞珍, 毛 新華, 高橋 直樹 (2007). 顔形態特徴の日中韓比較(1): 顔面表情に伴う顔形態の文化比較 (対面コミュニケーション-顔を中心的メディアとした). 電子情報通信学会技術研究報告, HCS, ヒューマンコミュニケーション基礎, 107(241), 13-18.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues