바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.4
Citation Share

The Effects of Residual Capacity on Nontarget Processing

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.4, pp.589-599
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.009



& (2010). The Effects of Residual Capacity on Nontarget Processing. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(4), 589-599, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.009
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

A detailed manipulation of participants’ intention to novel shapes resulted in nontarget recognition (H.-J. Kim & J.-O. Kim, 2010; H.-W. Cho & J.-O. Kim, 2010). A residual capacity hypothesis attributed nontarget perception as being due to capacity remained after target processing for connecting contour parts of the ignored shape. To test the predictions derived from this hypothesis, two experiments varied capacity expenditure of contour tracing, external structure encoding, or associative encoding of an unfamiliar shape. A faster tracing with the external structure encoding condition and an easier association task with tracing condition demonstrated evidence for the nontarget shape recognition. These findings confirmed the predictions generated from the residual capacity hypothesis.

keywords
Nontarget recognition, residual capacity hypothesis, contour tracing, association process, external structure encoding, 비표적의 재인, 잔여용량설, 윤곽 추적, 연상 과정, 외적 구조 약호화

Reference

1.

김희정, 김정오 (2010). 낯선 형태에 대한 연상이 비표적 형태에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 161-176.

2.

문기현, 박예송, 김정오 (2010). 무주의 형태의 지각에 대한 잔여용량설과 주의통제 실패설의 비교 검증. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 405-417.

3.

조현욱, 김정오 (2010). 선택적 주의가 형태의 내적/외적 구조를 모두 파악하는가? 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 59-73.

4.

DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory n and Cognition, 22, 27-47.

5.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

6.

Kwak, H.-W., & Kim, J.-O. (1981). Self- terminating processing in curve tracing. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 1, 21-36.

7.

Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.

8.

Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.

9.

McCormick, P. A., & Jolicoeur, P. Capturing visual attention and the curve tracing operation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 72-89.

10.

Rock, I., & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285.

11.

Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy