바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.1
Citation Share

전역/국지처리 과제에서 정서자극이 시각적 주의범위에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Emotional Valence on Visual Attentional Scope in Global/Local Processing Task

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.1, pp.139-151
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.1.005
박선희 (전남대학교)
박태진 (전남대학교)
박선희, & 박태진. (2011). 전역/국지처리 과제에서 정서자극이 시각적 주의범위에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(1), 139-151, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.1.005
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

자극의 정서가가 전역/국지처리에서 시각적 주의범위에 미치는 영향을 밝히기 위해 두 가지 실험을 수행하였다. 첫 번째 실험에서는 전역/국지처리에서 전역 선행성과 국지 선행성을 보이는 자극 조건을 확인하기 위해 국지자극의 밀집성을 변화시켜 고밀도와 저밀도조건으로 구분하고, 각 조건에서 전역/국지처리의 반응 특성을 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 고밀도조건에서는 전역 선행성이, 저밀도조건에서는 국지 선행성이 관찰되었다. 두 번째 실험에서는 전역/국지형태를 제시하기 전에 정서자극을 제시하여, 선행하는 정서자극이 전역/국지처리에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 자극의 정서가에 따라 전역/국지처리에 미치는 영향이 달랐는데, 고밀도조건에서는 긍정자극과 중립자극의 전역 선행성이, 저밀도조건에서는 부정자극의 국지 선행성이 관찰되었다. 이는 긍정정서와 부정정서의 주의범위가 상이함을 시사하는 결과로, 긍정자극의 주의범위 확장과 부정자극의 주의범위 축소를 반영하는 것이다.

keywords
전역/국지처리, 정서, 시각적 주의범위, global/local processing, emotional valence, visual attentional scope

Abstract

We investigated whether emotional valence has an effect on visual attentional scope in global/local processing task. We presented hierarchical stimuli with different number of elements and different inter-element distances at local scale. The global/local compatibility effect relied on the sparsity of local stimuli (Experiment 1). Low sparsity stimuli (high density) elicited global precedence, and high sparsity (low density) stimuli elicited local precedence. Global and local precedence of global/local compatibility effect also relied on a leading emotional valence (Experiment 2). The global precedence effect was found for positive and neutral target, and the local precedence effect was found for negative target. These results suggest that the visual attentional scope is influenced by emotional valence. In other words, positive emotion broadened the scope of attention, and negative emotion narrowed the scope of attention.

keywords
전역/국지처리, 정서, 시각적 주의범위, global/local processing, emotional valence, visual attentional scope

참고문헌

1.

박태진, 박선희 (2009). IAPS 자극에 대한 한국 대학생의 정서 평가. 인지과학, 20, 183 -195.

2.

Amirkhiabani, G., & Lovegrove, W. (1999). Do the global advantage and interference effects covary? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1308-1319.

3.

Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Positive affect and flexibility: Overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motivation and Emotion, 2, 123-134.

4.

Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Neidenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

5.

Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.

6.

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319.

7.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.

8.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 313-332.

9.

Kimchi, R. (1988). Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 189-198.

10.

Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A Critical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.

11.

Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521-535.

12.

Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top down”, “bottom op” or “middle-out”. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.

13.

Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 254-258.

14.

Lang, P. J., Bradley. M. M., & Cuthbert. B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of Pictures and instruction manual. (Technical Report A-6). University of Florida, Gainesville. FL.

15.

Matlin, M. W., & Underhill, W. A. (1979). Selective rehearsal and selective recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 389-392.

16.

Montoro, P. R., & Luna, D. (2009). Deconfounding the effects of local element spatial heterogeneity and sparsity on processing dominance. The Journal of General Psychology, 136, 407-427.

17.

Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.

18.

Navon, D., & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.

19.

Nobata, T., Hakoda, Y., & Ninose, Y. (2010). The functional field of view becomes narrower while viewing negative emotional stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 886-891.

20.

Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

21.

Paquet, L., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Global precedence: The effect of exposure duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 45-53.

22.

Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 511-535.

23.

Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247-270.

24.

Wandmacher, J., & Arend, U. (1985). Superiority of global figures in classification and matching. Psychological Research, 47, 143-157.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책