바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Reciprocal Effects of Deviant Self-Concept and Delinquent Behaviors Revisited: A Latent State-Trait Autoregressive Modeling Approach

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2010, v.16 no.4, pp.447-468


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to attain a clearer understanding of the reciprocal effects of deviant self- concept and delinquent behaviors by applying a latent state-trait autoregressive modeling approach. Although traditional autoregressive cross-lagged (ARCL) modeling has been widely applied to test the longitudinal reciprocal relationship between the two constructs, it could produce misspecified findings if there were trait-like processes involved in this relationship. The latent state-trait autoregressive(LST-AR) modeling was applied to control trait effects of deviant self-concept and to examine the reciprocal causal relations between the two constructs. Data were taken from a sample of 3,449 eighth graders who were followed annually for 5 years from the Korea Youth Panel Study. The combining LST-AR model with ARCL model substantiated the reciprocal effects of deviant self-concept and delinquent behaviors, even after the stable trait component of deviant self-concept was taken into account. The present findings shed lights on the reciprocal effects of behaviors (i.e., delinquency) and self‒concepts (i.e., deviant self-concept). Not only did behaviors change corresponding self-concept, but the ways adolescents perceived themselves influenced their behaviors.

keywords
latent state-trait autoregressive modeling, autoregressive cross-lagged modeling, delinquency, deviant self-concept, reciprocal effects, 잠재 상태-특성 자기회귀 모델, 자기회귀 교차지연 모델, 청소년 비행, 일탈적 자아개념, 상호적 인과관계

Reference

1.

박영신, 김의철 (2008). 한국사회와 교육적 성취 (III): 성취의 그늘, 한국 청소년 일탈행동의 형성과 심리적 역동. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 223-253.

2.

박영신, 김의철, 김영희 (2007). 한국 청소년의 일탈행동 형성과정에 대한 종단 분석: 심리적, 관계적, 그리고 사회적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 13(1), 1-41.

3.

이은주 (2009). 청소년 비행과 비행친구의 인과관계에 대한 자기회귀 교차지연 모델의 검증. 한국청소년연구, 20(1), 141-171.

4.

이은주, 정익중 (2009). 청소년 비행과 일탈적 자아개념의 상호적 인과관계. 한국청소년연구, 20(2), 191-221.

5.

전겸구, 한덕웅, 이장호 (1997). 한국판 STAXI 척도 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 2(1), 60- 78.

6.

정익중 (2006). 자아존중감과 청소년비행 간의 상호적 영향. 사회복지연구, 31, 133-159.

7.

홍성열 (2005). 범죄심리학. 학지사

8.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

9.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 User's Guide. Chicago, SPSS.

10.

Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Self–esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self–esteem or from threatened egotism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 26–29.

11.

Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1-44.

12.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

13.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). Patterns of change: Measurement in relation to state–dimension, trait change, lability, and process concepts. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp.288-329). Chicago: Rand McNally.

14.

Ciesla, J. A., Cole, D. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). Extending the trait–state–occasion model: How important is within–wave measurement equivalence? Structural Equation Modeling, 14(1), 77–97.

15.

Cole, D. A., Martin, N. C., & Steiger, J. H. (2005). Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait–state models: Introducing a trait–state–occasion model. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 3-20.

16.

Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593–623.

17.

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662-676.

18.

Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Personality, conditioning, and antisocial behavior. In W. S. Lauffer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior (pp.51-81). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

19.

Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.

20.

Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1987). Beyond autoregressive models: Some implications of the trait–state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change. Child Development, 58, 93–109.

21.

Jackson, K. M., & Sher, K. J. (2003). Alcohol use disorders and sychological distress: A prospective state–trait analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 599-613.

22.

Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait–state–error model for multi–wave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 52–59.

23.

Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). The trait-state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp.243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

24.

Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self–esteem in context: The importance of stability of self–esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1-37.

25.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd. ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

26.

Kraemer, H. C., Gullion, C. M., Rush, A. J., Frank, E., & Kupfer, D. J. (1994). Can state and trait variables be disentangled? A methodological framework for psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Research, 52, 55-69.

27.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326.

28.

Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a mutidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133- 163.

29.

Matthews, G., & Deary, I. J. (1998). Personality traits. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177-196.

31.

Neighbors, C., Larimer, M. E., Geisner, I. M., & Knee, C. R. (2004). Feeling controlled and drinking motives among college students: Contingent self-esteem as a mediator. Self and Identity, 3, 207-224.

32.

Olatunji, B. O., & Cole, D. A. (2009). The longitudinal structure of general and specific anxiety dimensions in children: Testing a latent trait–state–occasion model. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 412-424.

33.

Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological well–being. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 33- 42.

34.

Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L., & Lagerspetz, K. (1999). Self–evaluated self–esteem, peer–evaluated self–esteem and defensive egotism as predictors of adolescents' participation in bullying situations. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 25, 1268-1278.

35.

Scheff, T. J., & Fearon, D. S. (2004). Cognition and emotion? The dead end in self–esteem research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 34, 73-91.

36.

Schmitt, M. (2000). Mother–daughter attachment and family cohesion: Single-and multi–construct latent state–trait models of current and retrospective perceptions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(2), 115-124.

37.

Schmitt, M. J., & Steyer, R. (1993). A latent state–trait mode (not only) for social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 519- 529.

38.

Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

39.

Steyer, R., & Schmitt, M. J. (1990). The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity and reliability. Methodika, 4, 58-94.

40.

Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1994). The theory of confounding and its application in causal modeling with latent variables. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp.36-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

41.

Steyer, R., Schmitt, M. J., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389-408.

42.

Spielberger, C. D. (1972). `Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol.1, pp.23–49). New York: Academic Press.

43.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state–trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

44.

Swann, W. B., Jr., Chang–Schneider, C., & Larsen McClarty, K. (2007). Do people's self–views matter? Self–concept and self–esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 84-94.

45.

Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2003). Potential problems with “well-fitting” models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(41), 578-598.

46.

Yasuda, T., Lawrenz, C., Van Whitlock, R, Lubin, B., & Lei, P. -W. (2004). Assessment of intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect using latent state–trait model analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 514-530.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues