Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1229-0653
- KCI
ISSN : 1229-0653
The Confucian Origin of the East Asian Collectivism
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Compared with the individualistic culture of Western countries (e.g. America, Canada, Australia, Britain, France, Germany, and Netherlands etc.), East Asian countries (e.g. Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore etc.) have the collectivistic culture. People in these two cultures have different psychological and behavioral tendencies. In individualistic culture, they place high values on the independence and autonomy, frank expression of private feelings and needs, and stable consistency between personal dispositions and behaviors. On the other hand, in collectivistic culture they strive to achieve interdependence and harmony with others, to control the private feelings and needs, and to change themselves in accordance with their situations and relations with others. On the background of these differences, there lie different views of human being in general and the self-construal. That is, those living in the individualistic culture have individual-centered view of human being and independent (and separate) self-construal; in contrast with this, those in the collectivistic culture have relation-centered view of human being and interdependent (and holistic) self-construal. In this paper, the author tried to explicate the origins of these cultural differences in the traditional systems of thought in the Western and East Asian societies, and their theories of ideal person derived from these systems. From these review, it was found that the origin of Western individualism lies in the ideocentric liberalism, and that of East Asian collectivism lies in the strong tradition of Confucianism.
- keywords
- 집단주의 - 개인주의, 인간관(관계중심적 - 개인중심적), 자기관(상호의존적 - 독립적), 문화차 개관의 기본틀, 유학사상의 인간관, 군자론·성인론, 사단칠정론, 인심도심설, Individualism-Collectivism, View of Human Being(Individual-centered vs. Relation-centered), Self-construal(Independent vs. Interdependent), Liberalism-Confucianism, Individualism-Collectivism, View of Human Being(Individual-centered vs. Relation-centered), Self-construal(Independent vs. Interdependent), Liberalism-Confucianism
Reference
大東文化硏究院 影印 (1958). 栗谷全書. 서울：成均館大學校.
大東文化硏究院 影印 (1958). 退溪全書(上․下). 서울：成均館大學校.
民族文化推進會 編 (1976). 국역 퇴계집(수정판). 서울：경인문화사.
民族文化推進會 編 (1997). 국역 율곡집(중판). 서울：솔.
楊倞 (818). 荀子注(服部宇之吉編, 漢文大系, 卷十五. 東京：富山房, 1972.).
王夢鷗 註譯 (1969). 禮記今註今譯. 臺北：臺灣商務印書館.
王先謙 (1891). 荀子集解(服部宇之吉編, 漢文大系, 卷十五. 東京：富山房, 1972.).
朱熹 (1177). 論語集註(京城書籍組合編, 原本備旨 論語集註. 서울：太山文化社, 1984.).
朱熹 (1177). 孟子集註(京城書籍組合編, 原本備旨 孟子集註. 서울：太山文化社, 1984.).
朱熹 (1177). 大學集註(京城書籍組合編, 原本備旨 大學․中庸. 서울：太山文化社, 1984.).
朱熹 (1177). 中庸集註(京城書籍組合編, 原本備旨 大學․中庸. 서울：太山文化社, 1984.).
고병익 (1996). 동아시아사의 전통과 변용. 서울：문학과 지성사.
孔 繁 (1994). 유학의 역사적 지위와 미래가치. 동아일보사 편, 공자사상과 21세기(pp.195-220). 서울：동아일보사.
길희성 (1998). 철학과 철학사：해석학적 동양철학의 길. 한국철학회 1998년도 춘계 학술 발표회 주제 논문.
김성태 (1989). 경과주의(증보판). 서울：고려대학교 출판부.
김충렬 (1982). 동양 인성론의 서설. 한국동양철학회 편, 동양철학의 본체론과 인성론(pp.169-184). 서울：연세대학교 출판부.
민경환 (2002). 성격심리학. 서울：법문사.
윤사순 (1992). 머리말：민족과 사상. 민족과 사상 연구회 편, 사단칠정론(pp.5-9). 서울：서광사.
윤사순 (1997). 한국 유학 사상사론. 서울：예문서원.
윤이흠, 박무익, 허남린 (1985). 종교인구조사의 방법론 개발과 한국인의 종교성향. 장병길 교수 은퇴기념논총 발간위원회 편, 한국 종교의 이해(pp.343-371). 서울：집문당.
윤태림 (1969). 한국인의 성격. 서울：현대교육총서 출판사.
윤태림 (1970). 한국인. 서울：현암사.
윤호균 (1999). 불교의 연기론과 상담. 최상진, 윤호균, 한덕웅, 조긍호, 이수원, 동양심리학：서구심리학에 대한 대안 모색(pp.327-375). 서울：지식산업사.
이광세 (1998). 동양과 서양：두 지평선의 융합. 서울：길.
정양은 (1970). 감정론의 비교연구：사회적 감정을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지, 1(3), 77-90.
諸橋轍次 (1982). 孔子․老子․釋迦：三聖會談. 東京：講談社(심우성 역. 공자․노자․석가. 서울：동아시아, 2001.).
조경욱 (2000). 일본 사회의 “이에”(家) 의식에 나타난 효와 조상 숭배. 동양사회사상, 3, 211-236.
조긍호 (1993). 대인평가의 문화간 차이：대인평가 이원모형의 확대 시론. 한국심리학회지：사회, 7(1), 124-149.
조긍호 (1996). 문화유형과 타인이해 양상의 차이. 한국심리학회지：일반, 15(1), 104-139.
조긍호 (1997). 문화유형과 정서의 차이：한국인의 정서 이해를 위한 시론. 심리과학(서울대학교 심리과학연구소), 6(2), 1-43.
조긍호 (1998). 유학심리학：맹자․순자 편. 서울：나남출판.
조긍호 (1999a). 문화유형에 따른 동기의 차이. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 13(2), 233-273.
조긍호 (1999b). 선진유학에서 도출되는 심리학의 문제. 최상진, 윤호균, 한덕웅, 조긍호, 이수원, 동양심리학：서구심리학에 대한 대안 모색(pp.31-161). 서울：지식산업사.
조긍호 (2000). 문화유형과 동기의 차이：한국인의 동기 이해를 위한 시론. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 14(2), 83-122.
조긍호 (2003). 한국인 이해의 개념틀. 서울：나남출판.
조긍호 (2006). 이상적 인간형론의 동․서 비교：새로운 심리학의 가능성 탐색 I. 서울：지식산업사.
조긍호 (2007). 동아시아 집단주의의 유학사상적 배경：심리학적 접근. 서울：지식산업사.
陳鼓應 (1994). 易傳與道家思想. 臺北：商務印書館(최진석, 김갑수, 이석명 역. 주역：유학의 사상인가, 도가의 사상인가. 서울：예문서원, 1996.).
차경호 (1995). 한국, 일본 및 미국 대학생들의 삶의 질의 비교. 한국심리학회 편, 삶의 질의 심리학(pp.113- 144). 서울：한국심리학회.
차재호(1994). 문화설계의 심리학. 서울：서울대학교 출판부.
馮友蘭 (1948). A short history of Chinese philosophy. 臺北：雙葉書店(정인재 역. 중 국철학사. 서울：형설출판사, 1977.).
한덕웅 (1994). 퇴계심리학. 서울：성균관대학교 출판부.
현상윤 (1949). 조선유학사. 서울：민중서관.
홍숙기 (2004). 성격심리 상(수정판). 서울：박영사.
Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(2nd ed., Vol.1, pp.1-80). Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley.
Barnlund, D. C. (1975). Public and private self in Japan and the United States. Tokyo, Japan：Simul Press.
Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. S. (1983). College students’ spontaneous self-concepts：The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psy- chology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond(Ed.), The psychology of Chinese people(pp.213-266). New York：Oxford University Press.
Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
Choi, I., & Choi, Y. (2002). Culture and self-concept flexibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bul- letin, 28, 1508-1517.
Davis, M. H., & Stephan, W. G. (1989). Attributions for exam performance. Journal of Applied Social Psy- chology, 10, 235-248.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National and cultural difference in reported subjective well- being：Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7-32.
Dülmen, R. V. (1997). Die Entdeckung des Individuums 1500-1800. Frankfurt am Main：Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag(최윤영 역. 개인의 발견：어떻게 개인을 찾아가는가, 1500-1800. 서울：현실문화연구, 2005.).
Ekman, P. (1982). Emotions in the human face(2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gillbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol.2, pp.915-981). Boston, MA：McGraw-Hill.
Geen, R. G. (1995). Human motivation：A social psycho- logical approach. Pacific Grove, CA：Brooks/Cole.
Gergen, K. J., & Davis, K. E. (Eds.). (1985). The social construction of the person. New York：Springer.
Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psy- chology of culture：Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psy- chology 3, 223-240.
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of personality (3rd ed.). New York：Wiley(이상로, 이관용 역. 성격의 이론. 서울：중앙적성출판부, 1987.).
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural con- struction of self-enhancement：An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268-1283.
Hjelle, L. A., & Ziegler, D. J. (1981). Personality theories：Basic assumption, research, and applications(2nd ed.). New York：MaGraw-Hill(이훈구 역. 성격심리학. 서울：법문사, 1983.).
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences：International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA：Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations：Software of the mind. London：McGraw-Hill(차재호, 나은영 역. 세계의 문화와 조직. 서울：학지사, 1995.).
Jung, C. G. (1923/1971). Psychological types. In Read et al.(Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol.6, pp.1-495). Princeton, NJ：Princeton Univer- sity Press.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1994). A critical appraisal of individual- ism and collectivism：Toward a new formulation. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon(Eds.), Individualism and collec- tivism：Theory, method, and applications(pp.52- 65). Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology(2nd ed., Vol.3, pp.1-49). Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon.
Kagitcibasi, C., & Berry, J. W. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology：Current research and trends. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 493-531.
Kim, U. (1995). Individualism and collectivism：A psy- chological, cultural and ecological analysis. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) Report Series, No.21. Copenhagen, Denmark：NIAS Books.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collec- tive processes of self-esteem management：Self- enhancement in the United States and self- criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
Laurent, A. (1993). Historie de l'individualisme. Paris：Presses Universitaires de France(김용민 역. 개인주의의 역사. 서울：한길사, 2001.).
Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. New York：Harper & Row.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991a). Culture and the self：Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991b). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self：Interdisciplinary approaches(pp. 18-48). New York：Springer.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994a). A collective fear of the collective：Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psy- chology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994b). The cultural construction of self and emotion：Implications for social behavior. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture：Empirical investiga- tions of mutual influence (pp.89-130). Washington, DC：American Psychological Association.
Matsumoto, D. (1989). Cultural influence on the percep- tion of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psy- chology, 20, 92-105.
Matsumoto, D. (2000). Culture and psychology：People around the world(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA：Wadsworth.
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The person：An integrated intro- duction to personlity psychology(3rd ed.). Orlando, FL：Harcourt College Publishers.
Mizokawa, D. T., & Ryckman, D. B. (1990). Attributions of academic success and failure：A comparison of six Asian-American ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 434-451.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause：American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
Needham, J. (1969). Science and civilization in China(3 Vols.). Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press(이석호, 이철주, 임정대 역. 중국의 과학과 문명. 서울：을유문화사, 1986.).
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought：How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York：Free Press.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought：Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
Norenzayan, A, Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural similarities and differences in social inference：Evidence from behavioral predictions and lay theories of behavior. Personality and Social Psy- chology Bulletin, 28, 109-120.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism：Eval- uation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics and reasoning about contradition. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.
Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivisitic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142-152.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation：Perspectives of social psychology. New York：McGraw-Hill.
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self：A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.) (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA：Psychology Press.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York：Summit Books.
Stigler, J. W., Smith, S., & Mao, L. (1985). The self- perception of competence by Chinese children. Child Development, 56, 1259-1270.
Suh, E., & Diener, E. (1995). Subjective well-being：Issue for cross-cultural research. 한국심리학회 편, 삶의 질의 심리학(pp.147-165). 서울：한국심리학회.
Tönnies, F. (1887/1957). Community and society(C. P. Loomis, Trans.). East Lansing, MI：Michigan State University Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1988). Collectivism versus individualism：A reconceptualization of a basic concept of cross- cultural psychology. In G. K. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition(pp.60-95). London：Macmillan.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO：Westview.
Tu, Wei-Ming (1985). Selfhood and otherness in Con- fucian thought. In A. J. Marsella, G. A. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu(Eds.), Culture and self：Asian and Western perspective(pp.231-251). New York：Tavistock.
Tu, Wei-Ming (1996). Confucian tradition in East Asian modernity. Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press.
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in：The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psycholo- gist, 39, 955-969.
Wiggins, J. S. (1992). Agency and communion as concep- tual coordinates for the understanding and mea- surement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology(pp.89-113). Minneapolis, MN：Univer- sity of Minnesota Press.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations