바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.4

Citation Share

전전두피질 비대칭성이 고통상황의 공감반응에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Prefrontal Cortical Asymmetry on Empathic responses in painful situation

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.4, pp.17-37
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.4.002
정봉교 (영남대학교)
정봉교. (2015). 전전두피질 비대칭성이 고통상황의 공감반응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(4), 17-37, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.4.002

초록

본 연구는 우측 중전두피질의 비대칭성이 공감특질 및 공감반응과 관련성이 있는가를 알아보았다. 실험참가자들은 먼저 공감특질을 측정하기 위한 대인관계반응지수에 반응을 하였다. 기저선 중전두피질 EEG 비대칭성을 측정한 후, 실험참가자들이 고통상황 또는 중립상황을 나타내는 손이 포함된 사진 또는 만화를 보면서 고통단서에 주의를 쏟기를 요구하는 고통평정 과제 혹은 고통단서로부터 주의를 돌리려는 손의 수 세기 과제를 수행하는 동안, 사건관련전위(ERP)가 기록되었다. 우측 활성화 집단이 좌측 활성화 집단에 비해 유의하게 높은 공감적 걱정과 개인적 고통을 나타내었고, 고통평정 과제를 수행하는 동안 사진자극으로 제시된 고통상황의 고통강도를 가장 높게 평가하였다. 또한 우측 활성화 집단은 좌측 활성화 집단에 비해 사진자극으로 제시된 고통상황에서 고통강도를 평정하는 동안 더 높은 P300과 후기 양성전위(LPP)를 보였다. 우측 활성화 집단이 좌측 활성화 집단에 비해 더 높은 공감특질과 고통의 공감상황에서 더 높은 P300과 LPP 반응을 나타내었다는 관찰은 우측 중전두피질의 비대칭성이 높은 공감특질과 고통상황에서 공감반응의 예측 요인이라는 가설을 지지해주었다. 본 연구는 우측 전두피질의 높은 활동성이 타인의 고통에 대한 민감성을 촉진함으로써 사회적 정서소통에 필요한 대인능력에 기여할 수 있다는 점을 시사해준다.

keywords
midfrontal asymmetry, IRI, EEG, pain, empathy, P300, LPP, 중전두피질 비대칭성, 대인관계반응지수, EEG, 고통, 공감, P300, LPP

Abstract

This research examined whether right midfrontal cortical asymmetry might be associated with empathic traits and reactions. Experimental participants completed interpersonal reactivity index(IRI) to measure empathic traits. Resting EEGs were recorded to measure frontal cotical asymmetry. During presenting pictures or cartoons of hands that were in painful or neutral situation, event-related brain potentials(ERPs) were recorded from participants who performed a pain judgement task that required attention to pain cues in the stimuli or a hand counting task that withdraw their attention from these cues. Relative to left midfrontal activation group, right midfrontal activation group showed higher empathic concern and personal distress and rated the painful picture stimuli as the highest painful ones. In rating pain intensity of painful picture stimuli, right midfrontal asymmetry induced increased P300 and LPP(late positive potentials) than left frontal activation did. These results supported the hypothesis that right frontal EEG asymmetry might be a predictor of empathic traits and empathic reactions in painful situation. This study suggests that right bias in frontal cortical activation may contribute to desirable interpersonal abilities for social communication of emotion through facilitating sensitivity towards the suffering of others.

keywords
midfrontal asymmetry, IRI, EEG, pain, empathy, P300, LPP, 중전두피질 비대칭성, 대인관계반응지수, EEG, 고통, 공감, P300, LPP

참고문헌

1.

박성희 (2004). 공감학. 서울: 학지사.

2.

박윤희, 정봉교 (2012). 인지 및 정서 추론 만화과제에서의 반응시간 및 대뇌피질 활동과 공감 수준 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 24, 295-313.

3.

정봉교 (2007). 전두피질 비대칭성, 긍정적 정서 및 접근 동기. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 19, 127-147.

4.

정봉교 (2013). 중전두피질의 비대칭성이 정서사진 자극에 대한 사건유발전위에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 25, 463-482.

5.

정봉교, 윤병수 (2001). 전뇌 α 파 활동성의 반구 비대칭성과 정동유형. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 13, 71-81.

6.

Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 15-25.

7.

Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.

8.

Cano, M. E., Class, Q. A., & Polich, J. (2009). Affective valence, stimulus attributes, and P300: Color vs. black/white and normal vs. scrambled images. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 17-24.

9.

Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case of hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502-516.

10.

Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy- based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749-758.

11.

Coan, J. A., Allen, J. J. B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2001). Voluntary facial expressions and hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex. Psychophysiology, 38, 912-925.

12.

Cu, X., & Han, S. (2007). Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 36, 256-267.

13.

Davidson, R. J. (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hudgahl(Eds.), Brain asymmetry(pp. 361-364). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

14.

Davidson, R. J. (2002). Anxiety and affective style: Role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 68-80.

15.

Davidson, R. J., Schaffer, C. E., & Saron, C. (1985). Effects of lateralized presentations of faces on self-reports of emotion and EEG asymmetry in depressed and non-depressed subjects. Psychophysiology, 22, 353-364.

16.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.

17.

Dawson, G., Panagiotides, H., Klinger, L. G., & Hill, D. (1992). The role of frontal lobe functioning in the development of infant self-regulatory behavior. Brain and Cognition, 20, 152-175.

18.

de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300.

19.

Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119.

20.

Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111-116.

21.

Elliot, A. J., & Trash, T. M. (2002). Approach- avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.

22.

Eslinger, P. J., Moore, P., Troiani, V., Antani, S., Cross, K., Kwok, S., & Grossman, M. (2007). Oops! Resolving social dilemmas in frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78, 457-460.

23.

Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., de Greck, M., & Northoff, G. (2011). Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta- analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 35, 903-911.

24.

Fan, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: An event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 46, 160-173.

25.

Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351-374.

26.

Gotlib, I. H., Ranganath, C., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (1998). Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and cognitive function. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 449-478.

27.

Han, S., Jiang, Y., Humphreys, G. W., Zhou, T., & Cai, P. (2005). Distinct neural substrates for the perception of real and virtual visual worlds. NeuroImage, 24, 928-935.

28.

Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetric frontal brain activity. Biological Psychology, 67, 51-76.

29.

Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (1997). Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting brain EEG asymmetry: Covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 159-163.

30.

Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Peterson, C. K. (2010). The role of asymmetrical frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biological Psychology, 84, 451-462.

31.

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Hecht, D. (2011). An inter-hemispheric imbalance in the psychopath’s brain. Personality and Individual Difference, 51, 3-10.

33.

Ikes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

34.

Ikes, W. (2009) Empathic accuracy: Its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social, and physiological psychology. In J. Decety & W. Ickes(Eds.) The social neuroscience of empathy(pp. 57-70). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

35.

Knoch, D., Pascual-leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829-832.

36.

Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42-48.

37.

Light, S. N., Coan, J. A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Frye, C., Goldsmith, H. H., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Development, 80, 1210-1231.

38.

Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Clark, R. D. Ⅲ. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press.

39.

Quirin, M., Gruber, T. Kuhl, J., & Düsing, R. (2013). Is love right? Prefrontal resting brain asymmetry is related to the affiliation motive. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00902.

40.

Rozenkrantz, B., Olofsson, J. K., & Polish, J. (2008). Affective visual event-related potentials: Arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67, 114-123.

41.

Sabanetinelli, D., Lang, P. J., Keli, A., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). Emotional perception: Correlation of functional MRI and event related potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1085-1091.

42.

Schaller, M., & Ciald, R. B. (1988). The economics of empathic helping: Support for a mood management motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 333-353.

43.

Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257-261.

44.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., Goldsher, D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 55-67.

45.

Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204-210.

46.

Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., Wheeler, R. E., & Doss, R. (1992). Individual differences in anterior brain asymmetry and fundamental dimensions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 676-687.

47.

Tullett, A. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Right frontal cortical asymmetry predicts empathic reactions: Support fo link between withdrawal motivation and empathy. Psychophysiology, 49, 1145-1153.

48.

von Honk, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2006). From affective valence to motivational direction: The frontal asymmetry of emotion revisited. Psychological Science, 17, 963-965.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책