바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.1
Citation Share

Differences in suspects’ physiological responses depending on objective self-awareness during a polygraph test

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2018, v.32 no.1, pp.33-47
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.002

(2018). Differences in suspects’ physiological responses depending on objective self-awareness during a polygraph test. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 32(1), 33-47, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.002
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study aimed to examine differences in suspects’ physiological responses depending on objective self-awareness. To manipulate objective self-awareness, all the suspects were first seated in front of a mirror during a polygraph test, after which they completed the test without facing a mirror. Depending on the polygraph test results, the suspects were divided into two groups (lie and truth groups) to identify the differences in physiological responses. The results showed that in the lie group, suspects who completed the polygraph test in front of a mirror had more physiological responses than those who were not seated in front of a mirror. In contrast, the truth group showed no statistically significant differences in physiological responses related to self-awareness. The results indicate differences between the two groups in physiological responses depending on objective self-awareness. These findings may help to correctly detect the truth and lies in many applied settings.

keywords
폴리그래프 검사, 객관적 자기인식, 생리적 반응, polygraph test, objective self-awareness, physiological responses

Reference

1.

김석찬, 장은희, 이상현, 방철, 김시온, 김현택 (2015). 폴리그래프 검사 요인에 따른 검찰 처분 및 판결 일치도 연구: 검찰청 폴리그래프 실증 연구. 한국심리학회지: 법정 6(1), 13-31.

2.

박판규 (2003). 거짓말탐지검사. 서울. 삼우사.

3.

박희정, 홍우한 (2016). 거짓말 탐지 상황에서 객관적 자기인식이 용의자의 심리상태에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 30(1), 115-130.

4.

정재영, 김재홍, 김미영, 강민국, 지형기, 김기호, 이장한 (2010). 상반된 주장에 대한 폴리그래프 검사의 판별 정확성. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 24(1), 1-10.

5.

홍현기, 김희송, 지형기, 김기평, 진민진, 홍유나, 현명호 (2014). 숨김정보검사에서 유무죄 및 범죄정보 인식에 따른 생리심리반응 차이. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 33(3), 627-646.

6.

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.

7.

Beaman, A. L., Klentz, B., Diener, E., & Svanum, S. (1979). Objective self-awareness and transgression in children: A field study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1835-1846.

8.

Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Clinical judgment and decision-making in CQT-polygraphy. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 232-240.

9.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

10.

Buckley, J. P., & Senses, L. C. (1991). The Influence of Race and Gender on Blind Polygraph Charts Analyses. Polygraph, 20(4), 247-258.

11.

Bull, R. (1988). What is the lie-detection test? In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: Lies, truth and science(pp. 10-19). London: Sage.

12.

Diener, E., & Wallbom, M. (1976). Effects of self-awareness on antinormative behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 107-111.

13.

Duval, S., & Wichlund, R. A. (1972). Theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.

14.

Duval, T., Duval, V., & Neely, R. (1979). Self-focus, felt responsibility and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1769-1778.

15.

Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton and Company.

16.

Elaad, E. (2003). Is the inference rule of the control question polygraph technique plausible. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 37-47.

17.

Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time Money, and Morality. Psychological Science, 25(4), 414-421.

18.

Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142-155.

19.

Gougler, M., Nelson, R., Handler, M., Krapohl, D., Shaw, P., & Bierman, L. (2011). Meta-analytic survey of criterion accuracy of validated polygraph techniques. Polygraph, 40, 194-305.

20.

Gronau, N., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Cohen, A. (2005). Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 147-158.

21.

Honts, C. R. (2004). The psychophysiological detection of deception, In P. Granhang and L. Strömwall(Eds.) Detection of deception in forensic contexts. London: Cambridge University Press, 103-123.

22.

Horvath, F. S., & Reid, J. E. (1971). The reliability of polygraph examiner diagnosis of truth and deception. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62, 276-281.

23.

Lawson, G., Stedom, A., Zhang, C., Eubanks, D., & Frumkin, L. (2013). The effects of self-awareness on body movement indicators of the intention to deceive. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 687-693.

24.

Matte, J. A., & Reuss, R. M. (1992). A study of the relative effectiveness of physiological data in field polygraph examinations. Polygraph, 21(1), 1-22.

25.

Phillips, A. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Self-Awareness and the Emotional Consequences of Self-Discrepancies. Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 703-713.

26.

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

27.

Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy