바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.2

Citation Share

부부간 상호지각의 일치도와 결혼만족간의 관계

The Relationships of a Married Couple's Perception Congruence to Marital Satisfaction

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.2, pp.89-105
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.2.007
김향련 (경남대학교)
고재홍 (중앙대학교)
김향련, & 고재홍. (2007). 부부간 상호지각의 일치도와 결혼만족간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 89-105, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.2.007

초록

본 연구에서는 부부간 성격과 결혼가치관의 유사성과 상대방에 대한 이해 크기가 결혼만족과 관련되는지를 알아보았다. 또한 부부간 유사성과 이해 크기가 결혼 기간에 따라 달라지는지, 성격과 결혼가치관 영역별로 그것들이 차이가 있는지, 남편과 부인의 경우 다른지 등도 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 부부 155쌍의 대상으로 각각에게 자신과 배우자의 성격과 결혼가치관에 대한 지각을 알아보았다. 성격 지각의 경우는 5요인 성격이론에 근거하여, 결혼가치관 지각의 경우는 Acitelli 등(2001)의 연구를 참조한 4 영역에서 부부의 자기지각과 배우자 지각을 측정하였다. 부부간 상호지각의 일치도는 실제유사성(남편-부인 자기지각의 일치도), 가정된 유사성(자기지각과 상대방지각의 일치도), 이해(상대방에 대한 지각과 상대방의 자기지각의 일치도)의 세 가지로 구분하였다. 주요 결과는 첫째, 성격 영역에서는 실제 및 가정된 유사성보다 상대방에 대한 이해의 크기가 더 컸으며, 결혼가치관 영역에서는 가정된 유사성의 크기가 다른 일치도보다 더 크게 나타났다. 둘째, 기간은 모든 부부간 상호지각의 일치도 크기와 유의한 관계가 없었다. 셋째, 성격의 경우 남편의 가정된 유사성이 높을수록, 부인의 남편에 대한 이해가 클수록, 부부 모두의 결혼만족이 높았다. 그러나 결혼가치관의 경우 남편은 실제유사성과 부인에 대한 가정된 유사성이 높을수록, 결혼만족이 높은 반면, 부인은 남편에 대한 가정된 유사성이 높을수록, 결혼만족이 높았다.

keywords
Married couple, Actual similarity, Assumed similarity, Understanding, Marital satisfaction, Married couple, Actual similarity, Assumed similarity, Understanding, Marital satisfaction, 부부, 실제유사성, 가정된 유사성, 이해, 결혼만족

Abstract

The present study purports to investigate the relationships between several indices of perception congruence and marital satisfaction in married couples. Specifically it was carried out to find whether indices of perception congruence depend on marriage periods, domains, husbands and wives' beliefs and finally whether they are related to martial satisfaction. Data was collected from 155 married couples in Masan and Changwon. They did respond on prepared questionnaire to find out perceptions of the self and his(her) spouse on personalities and beliefs of marriage. Perception about personalities was measured in five domains based on Big 5 personality traits and perception about beliefs of marriage in four domains. The major results are followed： First, there was no meaningful relations between couple's marriage periods and all indices of their perception congruence. Second, in personalities couple's understanding of his(her) spouse was greater than actual and assumed similarity. In beliefs of marriage, assumed similarity that a spouse has the same beliefs of marriage was greater than other measures of perception congruence. Last, the effect on measures of perception congruence on marital satisfaction was different in personalities and beliefs of marriage. In personalities, the greater husband's assumed similarity and wife's understanding were, the greater their marital satisfaction was. In beliefs of marriage, However, the greater actual and assumed similarity of husband was, the greater the his marital satisfaction was. While the greater the wife's assumed similarity was, the greater her marital satisfaction was.

keywords
Married couple, Actual similarity, Assumed similarity, Understanding, Marital satisfaction, Married couple, Actual similarity, Assumed similarity, Understanding, Marital satisfaction, 부부, 실제유사성, 가정된 유사성, 이해, 결혼만족

참고문헌

1.

고재홍, 김명렬 (2004). 청소년 교우간 성격 유사성, 상호성, 이해 및 호감과의 관계. 청소년 상담 연구, 12(1), 53-64.

2.

고재홍, 전명진 (2003). 부부의 유사성과 결혼만족도간의 관계：프로파일 유사성 분석. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 17(3), 1-16.

3.

권정혜 (2000). 지각된 배우자 비판과 우울. 한국심리학회지：임상, 19(4), 697-712.

4.

김선영, 김영희 (2005). 결혼만족도와 이혼의도에 관련된 부부관계요인：신혼 초와 현재 결혼생활의 변화. 대한가정학회지, 43(9), 41-57.

5.

박영화, 고재홍 (2005). 부부의 자존감, 의사소통방식 및 갈등 대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계：자기효과와 상대방효과. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 19 (1), 65-83.

6.

유태용, 김명언, 이도형 (1997). 5요인 성격검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지：산업 및 조직, 10 (1), 85-102.

7.

이정은, 이영호 (2000). 개인특성, 스트레스, 및 부부간의사소통 패턴과 결혼만족도의 관계. 한국심리학회지：임상, 19(3), 531-548.

8.

이종선, 권정혜 (2002). 부부의 대인관계, 의사소통 패턴방식, 결혼만족도가 부부폭력에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지：임상, 21(2), 313-330.

9.

이경성, 한덕웅 (2001). 부부관계에서 배우자 행동의 귀인이 결혼만족과 이혼 의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 15(2), 41-64.

10.

한소영, 신희천 (2006). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성 척도의 개발. 한국심리학회지：상담 및 심리치료, 18 (4), 817-835.

11.

허윤미 (2001). 심리적 및 신체적 특성의 동질결혼. 한국심리학회지：일반, 20(2), 429-448.

12.

Acitelli, L. K., Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1993). Percep- tions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.

13.

Acitelli, L. K., Kenny, D. A., & Weiner, D. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167-185.

14.

Allen, A., & Thompson, T. (1984). Agreement, under- standing, realization, and feeling understood as predictors of communicative satisfaction in marital dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 915-921.

15.

Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

16.

Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal attrac- tion(2nd ed.) Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

17.

Blankenship, V., Hnat, S. M., Hess, T. G., & Brown, D. R. (1984). Reciprocal interaction and similarity of personality attributes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 415-432.

18.

Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

19.

Byrne, D., & Blaylock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes among husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 636-640.

20.

Caspi, A., Herbener, E. S., & Ozer, D. J. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 281-291.

21.

Chapdelaine, A., Kenny, D. A, & LaFontana, K. M. (1994). Matchmaker, matchmaker, can you make me a match?: Predicting liking between two unacquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 83-91.

22.

Corsini, R. (1956). Understanding and similarity in marriage. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psy- chology, 52, 327-332.

23.

Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, C. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456-473.

24.

Dawes, R., & Mulford, M. (1966). The false consensus effect and over-confidence: Flaws in judgement or flaws in how we study judgement? Organiza- tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 201-211.

25.

Dawson, D. A. (1991). Family structure and children's health and well-being: Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Study on Child Health. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 573-584.

26.

Feingold, A. (1989). Gender differences in effects of attractiveness and similarity on opposite sex attrac- tion: Integration of self-report and experimental finding. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, CT: New Haven.

27.

Feng, D., & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality, and psychological well-being. Behavior Genetics, 24, 357-364.

28.

Ferreira, A. J., & Winter, W. D. (1974). On the nature of marital relationship: Measurable differences in spontaneous agreement. Family Process, 13, 355- 370.

29.

Fletcher, G. J. O., Rosanowski. J., & Fitness, J. (1994). Automatic processing in intimate contexts: The role of close relationship beliefs. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 67, 888-897.

30.

Folkes, V. S., & Sears, D. O. (1977) Does everybody like a liker? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 505-519.

31.

Hawkins, J. L. (1968). Association between companion- ship and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 647-648.

32.

Hill, C. T., & Peplau, L. A. (1998). Premarital predictors of relationship outcomes: A 15-year follow up of the Boston Couples Study. In T. N. Bradbury(Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction. NY: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. NY: Guilford Press.

34.

Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439-448.

35.

Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 417-431.

36.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. NY: Guilford Press.

37.

Kenny, D. A., & Nasby, W. (1980). Splitting the reci- procity correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 249-256.

38.

Kline, M., Johnston, J. R., & Tschann, J. M. (1991). The long shadow of marital conflict: A model of children's postdivorce adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 297-309.

39.

Lakey, S. G., & Canary, D. J. (2002). Actor goal achieve- ment an sensitivity to partner as critical factors in understanding interpersonal communication compe- tence and conflict strategies. Communication Mono- graphs, 69, 217-235.

40.

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social zand Personal Relations, 22, 561-584.

41.

Morry, M. M. (2007). The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarity, and self-serving perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 24, 117-138.

42.

Oggins, J., Verrof, J., & Lever, D. (1993). Perceptions of marital interaction among black and white newly-weds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 494-511.

43.

Rice, P. F. (1979). Marriage and parenthood. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

44.

Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communi- cation. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.

45.

Tedeschi, J. T., Gaes, G. G., & Rivera, A. N. (1977). Aggression and the use coercive power. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 101-125.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책