바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.2

Citation Share

통제양식과 심리적 적응간의 관계

The Relation among Modes of Control and Psychological Adaptation

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.2, pp.245-262
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.013
박성현 (서울불교대학원대학교)
성승연 (서울불교대학원대학교)
박성현, & 성승연. (2011). 통제양식과 심리적 적응간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 245-262, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.013

초록

Shapiro(1994)는 기존의 통제 개념에 더하여 일차적 통제의 부정적 측면(부정적 주장양식) 과 이차적 통제의 긍정적 측면(긍정적 수용양식)을 측정할 수 있는 새로운 개념을 제안하였다. 이 연구에서는 첫째, 통제양식들이 어떻게 조합되었을 때 심리적 적응에 최적으로 기여하는 가를 알아보고자했다. 이를 위해 4가지 통제양식 점수를 중위수를 기준으로 상, 하 집단으로 구분한 후, 긍정적 주장양식과 긍정적 수용양식이 조합된 4개의 집단과 부정적 주장양식과 부정적 수용양식이 조합된 4개의 집단을 구성하였다. 집단 간에 심리적 적응지표들에서 유의한 차이가 있는가를 변량 분석(ANOVA)을 통해 분석하였다. 둘째, 부정적 주장양식과 긍정적 수용양식이 적응에 어떠한 방식으로 영향을 미치는가를 알아보고자 했다. 적응지표들에 대해 이들 두 가지 통제양식과 긍정적 주장양식 및 부정적 수용양식의 상호작용 효과를 위계적 회귀분석을 사용하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 긍정적 주장양식과 긍정적 수용양식 점수가 모두 높은 집단은 다른 집단들에 비해 긍정적 통제감을 더 지각하고, 부정적 통제감은 덜 지각했으며, 우울 수준 또한 낮았다. 반면, 부정적 주장양식과 부정적 수용양식의 점수가 모두 높은 집단은 긍정적 통제감은 낮게 지각하고 부정적 통제감, 우울 및 불안의 점수는 높았다. 부정적 주장양식은 다른 통제양식과 상호작용을 통해 적응을 떨어뜨린 반면, 긍정적 수용양식은 다른 통제양식과 상호작용을 통해 적응을 증진시키거나 적응의 악화를 완충하는 작용을 하였다.

keywords
Control, Modes of control, Positive yielding mode of control, Negative assertive mode of control, Psychological adaptation, 통제감, 통제양식, 긍정적 수용양식, 부정적 주장양식, 심리적 적응

Abstract

Shapiro suggested new concept to measure the positive aspect of secondary control(positive yielding mode) as well as the negative aspect of primary control. The purpose of this study was to find out the optimum combination among control modes for the psychological adaptation. Subjects were grouped according to their control mode scores into high or low groups and then grouped again with assertive and yielding modes, resulting 8 groups. The ANOVA was used to test the significance of difference on psychological adaptation among each groups. Another purpose of this study was to investigate the way how the negative assertive mode and the positive yielding mode contribute to the psychological adaptation. To do this, hierarchical regression analysis was used among two control modes and the interaction between positive assertive and negative yielding modes. The result showed that those who were high on positive assertive mode and positive yielding mode had not only higher sense of positive control but lower sense of negative control than others. They also showed lower level of depression. Those who were negatively high on both, on the other hand, showed low sense of positive control and high sense ho negative control. They were more depressed and anxious than others. The negative assertive mode interacted with other control mode, deducing the psychological adaptation, but the positive yielding mode increased it or alleviated the deterioration of adaption at least.

keywords
Control, Modes of control, Positive yielding mode of control, Negative assertive mode of control, Psychological adaptation, 통제감, 통제양식, 긍정적 수용양식, 부정적 주장양식, 심리적 적응

참고문헌

1.

김광일, 김재환, 원호택 (1984). 간이정신진단검사 실시 요강. 서울: 중앙적성출판사.

2.

김상희, 최정훈 (1990). 이차적 통제의 적응적 의미. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 9(1), 108-119.

3.

김정호 (2004). 마음챙김이란 무엇인가: 마음챙김의 임상적 및 일상적 적용을 위한 제언. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(2), 511-538.

4.

문현미 (2005). 인지행동치료의 제 3 동향, 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(1), 15-33.

5.

성승연, 박성현 (2008). 한국판 Shapiro 통제척도(K-SCI)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및성격, 22(4), 111-132.

6.

양정윤 (1999). 사회지향성, 자율지향성과 부정적 생활사건이 우울증상에 미치는 영향: 성격-사건 일치가설과 증 상 특정성 가설. 가톨릭대학교 석사학위논문.

7.

조긍호 (2003). 문화성향과 통제양식. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 17(2), 85-106.

8.

최상진 (1995). 한국인의 통제유형. 임능빈 편. 동양사상과 심리학 (pp. 535-543). 서울: 성원사.

9.

홍세희 (2007). 고급연구방법론 워크샵 시리즈 І. 연세대학교 사회복지대학원.

10.

Affleck, G.., Tunnen, H.., Pfeiffer, C., & Fifield, J.(1987). Appraisals of control and predictability inadapting to a chronic disease. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 53, 273-239.

11.

Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The SocialPsychology OF Chinese People. In M. H.Bond(Ed.), The psychology of Chinese people(pp, 213-266). New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

12.

Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K., & Schmitz, U.(1998). Maintaining self-integrity and efficacythrough adulthood and later life: The adaptivefunctions of assimilative persistence andaccomodative flexibility. In J. Heckhausen & C.S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulationacross the lifespan (pp. 365-388). Cambridge,England: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative Reactions to Increasesin Perceived Personal Control. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 56(2),246-256.

14.

Chang, W. C., Chua, W. L., & Toh, Y. (1997). Theconcept of psychological control in the Asiancontext, In K. Leung, U. Kim, S. Yamaguchi, &Y. Kashima (Eds.), Progress in Asian SocialPsychology(Vol. 1, pp, 95-117). Singapore:WILEY.

15.

Chipperfield, J. G.., & Perry, R. P. (2006). Primaryand Secondary Control Strategies in Later Life:Predicting Hospital Outcomes in Men andWomen. Health Psychology. 25(2), 226-236.

16.

Chipperfield, J. G.., & Perry, R. P. (2006). Primaryand Secondary Control Strategies in Later Life:Predicting Hospital Outcomes in Men andWomen. Health Psychology. 25(2), 226-236.

17.

Evans, G. E., Shapiro, D. H., & Lewis, M. (1993).Specifying dysfunctional mismatches betweendifferent control dimensions. British Journal ofPsychology, 84, 255-273.

18.

Jensen, M. P., & Karoly, P. (1991). Control beliefs,coping effort, and adjustment to chronic pain.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59, 431-438.

19.

Marlatt, G. A. (1983). The controlled-drinkingcontroversy: A commentary. AmericanPsychologist, 38, 1097-1110.

20.

McQuillen, A. D., Licht, M. H., & Licht, B. G..(2003). Contributions of Disease Severity andPerceptions of Primary and Secondary Control tothe Predition of Psychosocial Adjustment toParkinson's Disease. Health Psychology, 22(5),504-512.

21.

Morling, B., Kitayama, S., & Miyamato, Y. (2002).Cultural practices emphasize influence in the U.S. and adjustment in Japan. Personality andSocial Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311-323.

22.

Morling, M., & Evered, S. (2006). Secondary ControlReviewed and Defined. Psychological Bulletin.132(2), 269-296.

23.

Peterson, C., & Stunkard, J. (1989). Personal Controland Health Promotion. Social Science andMedicine, 28, 819-828.

24.

Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. (1982).Changing the world and changing the self.: Atwo-process model of perceived control. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.

25.

Shapiro, D. H. (1990). Clinical application of aquadrant model of control: Two case studies ofrelated disorders. The psychotherapy patient,7(1/2), 169-198.

26.

Shapiro, D. H. (1994). Manual for the Shapirocontrol Inventory (SCI). Palo Alto, CA:Behaviordata.

27.

Shapiro, D. H., & Astin, J. A. (1998). ControlTherapy: An Integrated Approach toPsychotherapy, Health, and Healing. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

28.

Shapiro, D. H., Schwartz, C. B., & Astin, J. A.(1996). Controlling ourselves, Controlling ourwolrd: Psychology's role in understandingPositive and Negative consequence of seekingand gaining control. American Psychologist, 51,1213-1230.

29.

Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & sherwood, H.(2003). Searching for the structure of coping: Areview and critique of category systems forclassifying ways of coping. PsychologicalBulletin, 1239, 216-269.

30.

Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten,P., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2008).Maladaptive Perfectionism as an InterveningVariable Between Psychological Control andAdolescent Depressive Symptoms: AThree-Wave Longitudinal Study. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 22(3), 465-474.

31.

Souza, M. D., Mussap, A. J., & Cummins, R. A.(2010). Primary and secondary over eatingbehaviors. Eating Behaviors, 11, 223-230.

32.

Sternberg, J. R. (2000). Images of Mindfulness.Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 1, 11-27.

33.

Talyor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion andWell-being : A social psychological perspectiiveon mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103,193-210.

34.

Talyor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994a). Posive illusion and well-being revisited : Separating fact fromfiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21-27.

35.

Talyor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994b). "Illusion" ofmental health does not explain positive illusions.American Psychologist, 49, 972-973.

36.

Thompson, S. C., Collins, M. A., Newcomb, M. D.,& Hunt, W. (1996). On fighting versus acceptingstressful circumstances: Primary and secondarycontrol among HIV-positive men in prison.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70, 1307-1317.

37.

Wahl, H. W., Becker, S., Burmedi, D., & Schilling,O. (2004). The Role of Primary and SecondaryControl in Adaptation to Age-Related VisionLoss: A Study of Older Adults with MacularDegeneration. Psychology and Aging. 19(1),235-239.

38.

Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C.(1984). Standing out and standing in: Thepsychology of control in America and Japan.American Psychologist, 39, 955-969.

39.

Wrosch, C., Heckhausen, J., & Lachman, M. E.(2000). Primary and Secondary Control Strategiesfor Managing Health and Financial StressAcross Adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15(3),387-399.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책