바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.26 No.1

Citation Share

강간사건 판단에 주변 단서들이 미치는 영향: 부부강간을 중심으로

The Effect of Peripheral Cues on the Judgement of Rape Cases : Focused on Marital Rape

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2012, v.26 no.1, pp.47-73
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.1.004
이정원 (아주대학교)
김혜숙 (아주대학교)
이정원, & 김혜숙. (2012). 강간사건 판단에 주변 단서들이 미치는 영향: 부부강간을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 26(1), 47-73, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.1.004

초록

본 연구는 강간사건에 있어서 사건의 본질과는 무관한 주변단서가 관찰자의 사건판단에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴보았다. 연구1에서는 대학생을 대상으로 피해자-가해자 관계유형(타인, 지인, 연인, 및 부부), 관찰자의 온정적 성차별주의(BS)와 성별간의 상호작용효과가 강간사건 판단에 미치는 영향에 대해 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 참여자들에게 4가지 다른 강간시나리오를 제시하고 그에 대한 판단을 하도록 하였다. 그 결과 부부강간은 다른 관계유형의 강간에 비해 강간으로 덜 지각되며, 강간피해가 덜 심각하다고 판단되고, 또한 가해자처벌도 낮게 내려졌다. 한편 피해여성이 전통적 성역할 규범에서 일탈된 행동을 보여준 연인강간에서만 예상대로 여성관찰자는 BS가 높아질수록 피해여성의 정숙성을 낮게 지각하여 강간을 자초한 것으로 판단해 피해자비난을 더 많이 하는 것으로 나타났다. 연구2에서는 부부강간에 초점을 맞추어 관찰자의 BS와 성별, 그리고 피해여성의 가정생활의 성실성 여부 지각이 부부강간사건 판단에 어떠한 영향을 주는지를 검토하였다. 그 결과 부부강간의 피해자가 평소 가정생활에 불성실하게 임했다는 정보가 제공될 경우, 강간사건 판단에 대한 관찰자의 BS 효과는 관찰자의 성별에 따라 각기 다른 방식으로 이루어졌다. 남성관찰자의 경우 BS가 높아질수록 동성(同性)가해자에 대한 비난을 감소시키는 방식으로 피해자에 대한 비우호적 판단이 나타난 반면, 여성관찰자의 경우 BS가 높아질수록 동성피해자에 대한 비난을 증가시키는 방식으로 피해자에 대한 비우호적 판단이 나타났다. 그리고 이러한 결과의 이론적․현실적 의미에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
강간사건 판단, 온정적 성차별주의, 부부강간, 피해자비난, the judgement of rape cases, benevolent sexism, marital rape, blaming victim

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of peripheral cues, such as the closeness of relationship between victim-perpetrator, the observer's benevolent sexism(BS) and sex on the judgement of rape cases. In Study 1, we hypothesized that female participants who were in high BS would show more unfavorable judgement on the rape victim than males of high BS, and this tendency would be stronger when the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator became closer. To examine the hypothesis we presented the participants with one of the four different types(stranger, acquaintance, dating couple and spouse) of rape scenarios and afterwards asked them to judge on it. The result of the hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that marital rape case was perceived less as rape, as less serious, and the perpetrator of the marital rape was imposed lighter punishment than of other rapes. Furthermore, only in the date rape case, those who were of high BS blamed the rape victim more than those who were of low BS and this tendency was stronger in females than in males. In study 2, we manipulated loyalty of the marital rape victim to her family and examined the effect of this variable on the judgement about marital rape. When the participants received the information that the victim was disloyal to her family, the observer's BS affected the judgement in different ways in terms of the observer's gender. That is,whereas high BS males showed unfavorable judgement of the victim by decreasing blame for the perpetrator,high BS females showed their unfavorable judgment of the victim by increasing blame for the victim. We discussed about the theoretical and practical implications of these results.

keywords
강간사건 판단, 온정적 성차별주의, 부부강간, 피해자비난, the judgement of rape cases, benevolent sexism, marital rape, blaming victim

참고문헌

1.

김혜숙, 안상수, 안미영, 고재홍, 이선이, 최인철 (2005). 적대적 성차별주의와 온정적 성차별주의가 여성 하위 집단에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지 사회 및 성격, 19(3), 117-133.

2.

안상수, 백영주, 김인순, 김혜숙, 김진실 (2007). 한국형 다면성별의식검사 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국여성정책연구원 연구보고서.

3.

윤병해, 고재홍 (2006). 양가적 성차별 태도에 따른 성폭력 피해자에 대한 비난 차이: 강간통념의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지 여성, 11, 1-19.

4.

이석재, 최상진 (2001). 강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동, 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(1), 97-116.

5.

이정원, 안상수, 김혜숙 (2009). 적대적 성차별주의와 온정적 성차별주의가 여성관련 정책 및 강간피해자에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회 연차 학술 발표대회 논문집, 208-209.

6.

최보라 (2005). 사회적 바람직성 척도 타당화. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사졸업논문.

7.

Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111-125.

8.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

9.

Anderson, I., & Swainson, V. (2001). Perceived motivation for rape: gender differences in beliefs about female and male rape. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 107–122.

10.

Batemen, E. (1991). The context of date rape. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger. (pp. 94-99). Seattle: Seal Press.

11.

Brekke, N. & Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.

12.

Bridges, J. S. (1999). Perceptions of date and strange r rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291-307.

13.

Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273-286.

14.

Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., Selby, J. W., & Magee, D. L. (1981). Victim emotional response: Effects on social reaction to victims of rape. British Journal of social Psychology, 20, 17-21.

15.

Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Selby, J. W. (1979). Attributing responsibility to the victim of rape: Influence of information regarding past sexual experience. Human Relations, 32, 57-67.

16.

Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.

17.

Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Can there be positive effects of participation in pornography experiments? Journal of Sex Research, 20, 14-31.

18.

Corcoran, K. J., & Thomas, L. R. (1991). The influence of observed alcohol consumption on perceptions of initiation of sexual activity in a college dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 500–507.

19.

Cowan, G. (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42, 807–823.

20.

Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Role, 10, 261-280.

21.

Duran, M., Moya, M., Megias, J. L., & Viki, G. T. (2009). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: the role of perpetrator's benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62(7/8), 505-519,

22.

Edmonds, E. M. & Cahoon, D. D. (1986). Attitudes concerning crimes related to clothing worn by female victims. Bulletin of the Psychonomic society, 24, 444-446.

23.

Freetly, A. J., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Men’s and women’s perceptions of non-consensual sexual intercourse. Sex Roles, 33, 785-802.

24.

Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heiling, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Role, 19, 141-153.

25.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

26.

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B.,Osagie, J., Akande, A., Alao, A., Brunner, A., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Exposito, F., Moya, M., Foddy, M., Kim, H.-J., Lameiras, M., Sotelo, M. J., Mucchi-Faina, A., Romani, M., Sakalli, N., Udegbe, B., Yamamoto, M., Ui, M., Ferreira, M. C, & Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as a simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

27.

Grubb, A., & Harrower, J. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: an analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 396–405.

28.

Johnson, J. D., & Jackson, L. A. Jr. (1988) Asserting the effects of factors that might underlie the differential perception of acquaintance and stranger rape. Sex Role, 19, 37-45.

29.

Johnson, K. K. P. (1995). Attributions about date rape: Impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 292–311.

30.

Johnson, J. D., Jackson, L. A. Jr., & Smith, G. J. (1989). The role of ambiguity and gender in mediating the effects of salient cognitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15,52-60.

31.

Kanekar, S., & Nazareth, A. M. (1988) attributed rape victim's fault as a function of her attractiveness, physical hurt, and emotional disturbance. Social Behavior, 3, 37-40.

32.

Kleinke, C. L., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 343-353.

33.

Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.

34.

Krahe, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50-58.

35.

L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134-139.

36.

Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M. (1995). Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451–464.

37.

Pualhus, D. L. (1998). Manual for the balanced inventory of desirable responding (BIDR-7). Toronto/Buffalo: Multi-Health systems.

38.

Simonson, K., & Subich, L. M. (1999). Rape perception as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim-perpetrator association. Sex Role. 40(7/8), 619-634

39.

Scronce, C. A., & Corcoran, K. J. (1995). The influence of the victim’s consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape. Violence Against Women, 1, 241–245.

40.

Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn’t want to doesn’t mean it’s rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psycho logy Quarterly, 46, 220-232.

41.

Vali, D., & Rizzo, N. (1991). Apparel as one factor in sex crimes against young females: Professional opinions of U.S. psychiatrists. International. Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 167–181.

42.

Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295-303.

43.

Weller, S. (1992). Why is date rape so hard to pove? Health, 6, 62-65.

44.

Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(4), 406-423

45.

Yarmey, A. D. (1986). Older and younger adults' attributions of responsibility toward rape victims and rapists. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 327-338.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책