바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.1
Citation Share

The relationship between two dimensional narcissism and romantic relationship: Analysis of the investment model

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2012, v.26 no.1, pp.87-101
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.1.006




& (2012). The relationship between two dimensional narcissism and romantic relationship: Analysis of the investment model. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 26(1), 87-101, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.1.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of narcissism on a romantic relationship using the investment model. The previous study considered narcissism as one dimensional construct. This study elaborated the previous findings by specifying the influence of distinctive dimensions of narcissism. A total of 240 college students completed a questionnaire measuring narcissism and the variables of the investment model. An exploratory factor analysis yielded two dimensions of narcissism, Grandiosity-Exhibitionism and Sensitivity-Vulnerability. The result of the structural equation modeling showed two paths from narcissism to commitment. First, Sensitivity-Vulnerability predicted commitment via relationship satisfaction. Second, Grandiosity-Exhibitionism predicted commitment via two mediators, which were the quality of alternative relationships and relationship satisfaction. In addition, the influences via these two paths counteracted each other, and consequently nullified the influence of Grandiosity-Exhibitionism on commitment. These findings imply the multifaceted roles of narcissism on a romantic relationship.

keywords
자기애, 연애관계, 투자모델, Narcissism, Romantic Relationship, Investment Model

Reference

1.

강은영, 이영호 (2006). 이차원 자기애 척도의 개발과 타당화: 자기주도적 자기애 및 타인의존적 자기애와 심리적 특성과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25(2), 397-415.

2.

권석만 (1995). 대학생의 대인관계 부적응에 대한 인지-행동적 설명모형. 학생연구: 서울대학교 학생생활연구소, 30(1), 38-63.

3.

권석만, 한수정 (2000). 자기애성 성격장애. 서울: 학지사.

4.

박순희 (2009). 내현적 자기애와 분노표현 양식이 대인 관계와 심리적 고통에 미치는 영향. 경남대학교 석사학위논문.

5.

박준형 (2006). 자기애, 타인 지향적 완벽주의, 공격성이 결혼만족도에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 석사학위논문.

6.

안범희 (1985). 대인관계적절성과 성향검사의 타당도 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

7.

이정은, 현명호, 유제민 (2007). 폭력적 데이트 관계 지속에 관한 투자모델의 수정-이타적 망상을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(4), 983-995.

8.

최종순 (2003). 자기애적 성격특성과 자기표현이 대인관계문제에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교 석사학위논문.

9.

한수정 (1999). 자기애적 성격성향자의 외현적, 내현적 자기관련 인지특성. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

10.

홍대식 (1998). 데이트 관계의 형성과 발전에 관련된 변인들: 한국 사회 및 성격 심리학회지, 12(2), 199-226.

11.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 243-264.

12.

황순택 (1995). 전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발. 연세대학교 박사학위 논문.

13.

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Rev. 3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

14.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

15.

Blackwell, L. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.

16.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

17.

Campbell, W. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254-1270.

18.

Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484-495.

19.

Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340-354.

20.

Clark, L. A., &Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.

21.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychology Methods, 1, 16-29.

22.

Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188-207.

23.

Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11-17.

24.

Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationship: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13-30.

25.

Gabriel, M. T., Critelli, J. W., & Ee, J. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality, 62, 143-155.

26.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1998). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161-183.

27.

Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456-470.

28.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

29.

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. E. (1978). Interpersonal relations : A theory of interdependence. New York:　Wiley.

30.

Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline condition and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

31.

Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

32.

Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

33.

Masterson, J. F. (1985). The real self. New York: Brunner Mazel.

34.

Materson, J. F. (1988). The search for the real self. New York: Free Press.

35.

Millon, T. (1981). Disorders and personality. New York: Wiley.

36.

Rose, P. (2002). The happy and unhappy faces of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 379-391.

37.

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: a test of the investment model. Journal of experimental social psychology, 16, 172-186.

38.

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: the development and deterioration of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101-117.

39.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz J. M., Agnew C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 356-387.

40.

Sedikides, C., Rudich, E. A., Gregg, A. P., Kumashiro, M., & Rusbult, C. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 400-416.

41.

Tice, D. M., Butler, J. L., Muraven, M. B., & Stillwell, A. M. (1995). When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1120-1138.

42.

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

43.

Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590-597.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy