권오성, 한형서 (2008). 한국에서 정치적 갈등에 대한 시론적 대응방안. 한독사회과학논총, 18(1), 73-102

김형준 (2010). 한국 사회 갈등 고찰과 정치 발전 방향 모색: 정당과 국회의 역할을 중심으로. 의정논총, 5(2), 129-158

김도환, 황상민, 최윤식 (2011). 정치 현상에 대한 한국인의 인식 유형과 심리적 기제. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 183-208.

동아일보 (2011. 12. 21). [김정일 사망]20대 56.5% “北 3대세습 말도 안돼”… 50대 다음으로 많아.

박광배 (2003). 변량분석과 회귀분석. 서울: 학지사.

이내영 (2011). 한국사회 이념갈등의 원인한국사회 이념갈등의 원인: 국민들의 양극화인가, 정치엘리트들의 양극화인가?. 한국정당학회, 10(2), 251-287

장훈, 한성열 (2010). 몰입(flow) 기능의 재구성: 몰입과 행복 관계에 대한 타인맥락의 조절효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(4), 43-62.

정승현, 강정인, 김수자, 문지영, 오향미, 홍태영 역, (2006). 현대 정치사상의 파노라마 : 민주주의의 이상과 정치 이념. Terence, B. & Richard, D. (2003). Political ideologies and the democratic ideal. 서울: 아카넷

정은경, 손영우 (2011). 진보와 보수의 도덕적 가치 판단의 차이: 간통죄를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 727-741.

정은경, 정혜승, 손영우 (2011). 진보와 보수의 도덕적 가치 판단의 차이: 용산재개발사건을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(4), 93-105.

정한울, 정원칠 (2009). 여론으로 본 한국 사회갈등 진단. 동아시아연구원, http://www.eai.or.kr/type_k/panelView.asp?bytag=p&code=kor_report&idx=8940&page=1

최석만, 국민호, 박태진, 한규석 (1990). 한국에서의 진보-보수적 태도의 구조와 유형에 대한 연구. 한국사회학, 24, 83-102.

홍기원, 이종택 (2010). 한국 성인의 이념적 지형과 심리적 요인. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 1-25.

한겨레신문 (2011. 5. 15). 2002년 보수>중도>진보, 2011년 중도>진보>보수.

YTN (2012. 2. 25). 서울 도심 한미 FTA 찬반 집회 동시에 열려.

Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Backstrom, M., & Bjorklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 10-17.

Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2010). Social identity and prejudiced personality. Pesonality and Idividual Differences, 48, 317-321.

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.

Chen, J., Chiu, C. & Chan, S. F. (2009). The cultural effects of job mobility and the belief in a fixed world: Evidence from performance forecast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 851-865.

Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y., & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923-940.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.

Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y, & Chiu, C. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644-656

Erdley, C. A., Cain, K. M., Loomis, C. C., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Relations among children’s social goals implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. Development Psychology, 33(2), 263-272.

Erdley, C. A. & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863-878.

Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. (1999). Social identification in a political transition: The role of implicit beliefs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(2), 297-318.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651-670

Jost, J. T. & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 55-64

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.

Jost, J. T., , Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989-1007

Kammrath, L. K., & Dweck, C. (2006). Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497-1508.

Leone, L. & Chirumbolo, A. (2008). Conservatism as motivated avoidance of affect: Need for affect scales predict conservatism measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 755–762

Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 156-168.

Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421-1436.

McHoskey, J. W. (1996). Authoritarianism and ethical ideology. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 709-717

Miller, C. H., Burgoon, J. K., & Hall, J. R. (2007). The effects of implicit theories of moral character on affective reactions to moral transgressions. Social Cognition, 25(6), 819-832.

Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192-203.

Molden, D. C., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit Theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 738-752.

Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientataion: Cross-national evidence from eastern and western europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175-203.

Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the right-wing authoritarianism(RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872.