바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.27 No.2

Citation Share

애착성향이 관계의 질에 미치는 영향: 온/오프라인 자기개방의 상호작용효과를 중심으로

How attachment style affacts relational quality?: The interaction effects of online and offline self-disclosure

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2013, v.27 no.2, pp.107-125
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.007
이서현 (고려대학교 심리학과)
양은주 (고려대학교)
권정혜 (고려대학교)
이서현, 양은주, & 권정혜. (2013). 애착성향이 관계의 질에 미치는 영향: 온/오프라인 자기개방의 상호작용효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27(2), 107-125, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.007

초록

인터넷의 등장은 대인관계의 형성과 발전에 새로운 장을 제공해주었다. 본 연구는 애착성향이 오프라인과 온라인에서의 자기개방에 어떤 영향을 미치며, 나아가 오프라인 자기개방과 온라인 자기개방이 어떤 상호작용을 통하여 관계의 질에 영향을 미치는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 선행 연구를 바탕으로 애착성향이 온라인과 오프라인에서의 자기개방을 매개로 하여 관계의 질에 이르는 경로모형을 가정하고 이의 타당성을 검증하고자 하였다. 이 모형에서는 애착불안 성향이 자기개방 행동을 촉진하는 특성으로 작용하며, 애착회피 성향은 자기개방을 억제하는 성향으로 작용할 것으로 가정하였으며, 이에 더해 오프라인에서의 자기 개방 행동과 온라인에서의 자기개방이 함께 상호작용하여 관계의 질에 영향을 줄 것으로 가정하였다. 눈덩이 표집법으로 전국에서 모집된 총 1051명(남자 468명, 여자 564명)의 연구 대상자에게 자기보고식 애착 척도, 온라인과 오프라인에서의 자기개방 척도, 관계의 질 척도로 구성된 설문지를 실시하였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 모형을 검증하기 위해 경로분석을 실시한 결과, 제안된 연구 모형의 적합도가 양호한 것으로 나타났으며, 애착성향이 자기개방을 매개하여 관계의 질에 이르는 경로도 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 애착회피의 경우 오프라인과 온라인 자기 개방으로 가는 경로계수가 모두 부적으로 나타났으나 애착불안의 경우에는 두 경로가 모두 정적으로 나타났다. 또한 애착불안에서 온라인 자기개방으로 가는 경로계수가 오프라인 자기개방으로 가는 경로계수보다 유의하게 큰 것으로 드러났다. 이에 더해 오프라인 자기개방과 온라인 자기개방은 상호작용하여 관계의 질에 영향을 미치는 것이 확인되었다. 이러한 결과에 기초하여 연구의 의의와 제한점을 논의하였다.

keywords
attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, online, offline, self-disclosure, relational quality, 애착불안, 애착회피, 온라인, 오프라인, 자기개방, 관계의 질

Abstract

The emergence of Internet introduces a new social space for building and developing relationships. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of self-disclosure in offline and online spaces in the relationship between attachment styles and the relationship quality and the moderating role of self-disclosure in online space in influencing the mediation. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized a path model in which online/offline self-disclosure mediated attachment styles and the relationship quality. In addition, the model included the interacting effects of online and offline self-disclosures on the relational quality. A total of 1051 participants (males 44.5%, females 54.6%, unspecified 0.09%) were included with an age range between 20 and 39. participants completed self-report measures of adult attachment styles, perceived breadth and depth of online and offline communication, and relationship quality. Results supported the mediation effects of self-disclosures in offline and online spaces in the relationship between attachment styles and the relational quality. path coefficients of avoidant attachment style with both online and offline self-disclosures were negative, while path coefficients of anxiety attachment style with both self-disclosures were positive. In addition, the relationship between anxiety style and online self-disclosure was stronger than that between anxiety style and offline self-disclosure. Finally, the moderating effect of online self-disclosure on the relationship between offline self-disclosure and the relationship quality was significant. The implications and limitations were discussed.

keywords
attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, online, offline, self-disclosure, relational quality, 애착불안, 애착회피, 온라인, 오프라인, 자기개방, 관계의 질

참고문헌

1.

박선주 (2010). 회피애착과 전문적 도움추구의도의 관계. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.

2.

박성복, & 황하성 (2007). 온라인 공간에서의 자기노출, 친밀감, 공동 공간감에 관한 연구. 한국언론학회, 51(6), 469-494.

3.

박수호 (2012). 인터넷 열풍과 대인관계의 변화. 사회와 이론, 20, 401-430.

4.

박지선 (2008). 애착유형에 따른 청소년의 심리적 적응이 전문적 도움추구 태도에 미치는 영향. 경성대학교 박사학위논문.

5.

한종혜 (1996). 아동의 사회적 관계망에 따른 역량 지각 및 자아 존중감. 경희대학교 박사학위논문.

6.

홍세희 (2000). 특별기고: 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

7.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C, Waters, E., & Wall, S.. (1979). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

8.

Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

9.

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “On the Internet No One Knows I'm an Introvert”: Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128.

10.

Anders, S. L, & Tucker, J. S. (2000). Adult attachment style, interpersonal communication competence, and social support. Personal Relationships, 7, 379-389.

11.

Archer, R. L. (1979). Role of personality and the social situation. Self-disclosure, 28-58.

12.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117, 497-529.

13.

Blais, J. J, Craig, W. M, Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). Adolescents online: The importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of youth and adolescence, 37, 522-536.

14.

Bowlby, J. (1953). Child care and the growth of love. London: Penguin Books.

15.

Bowlby, J. (1976). Separation: Anxiety and anger (Vol. 2): United State: Basic books.

16.

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. In J. A. Simson & W. S. Rholes(Eds.). Attachment theory and close relationships(46-76). New York: Guildford Press

17.

Collins, N. L, & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58, 644-663.

18.

Derlaga, V. J., & Berg, J. H. (Eds.). (1987). Self-disclosure: theory, research and therapy. Springer.

19.

Derlega, V. J, & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships, 151-176.

20.

Feeney, J. A, & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 58, 281-291.

21.

Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental psychology, 21, 1016.

22.

Gemmill, E., & Peterson, M. (2006). Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA Journal, 43, 280- 300.

23.

Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental psychology, 25, 633-649.

24.

Keelan, J P. R, Dion, K. K, & Dion, K. L. (1998). Attachment style and relationship satisfaction: Test of a self-disclosure explanation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 30, 24.

25.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58, 49-74.

26.

Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 1238.

27.

Lopez, F. G, & Brennan, K. A. (2000). Dynamic processes underlying adult attachment organization: Toward an attachment theoretical perspective on the healthy and effective self. Journal of Counseling psychology, 47, 283.

28.

Manne, S., Ostroff, J., Rini, C., Fox, K., Goldstein, L., & Grana, G. (2004). The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Family psychology, 18, 589.

29.

Mikulincer, M.. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 1209.

30.

Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 61, 321.

31.

Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R, & Pereg, D.. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and emotion, 27, 77-102.

32.

Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659-671.

33.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Research note: Individual differences in perceptions of Internet communication. European Journal of Communication, 21, 213-226.

34.

Pornsakulvanich, V., Haridakis, P., & Rubin, A. M. (2008). The influence of dispositions and Internet motivation on online communication satisfaction and relationship closeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2292-2310.

35.

Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 315-337.

36.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process.

37.

Solano, C. H, Batten, P. G, & Parish, E. A. (1982). Loneliness and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 43, 524.

38.

Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical psychology, 23, 857-877.

39.

Stackert, R. A, & Bursik, K.. (2003). Why am I unsatisfied? Adult attachment style, gendered irrational relationship beliefs, and young adult romantic relationship satisfaction. personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1419 -1429.

40.

Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18, 119 -146.

41.

Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M, Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental psychology, 29, 420-433.

42.

Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2006). Computer mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.

43.

Tidwell, M. O, Reis, H. T, & Shaver, P. R. (1996). Attachment, attractiveness, and social interaction: a diary study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71, 729.

44.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007a). Online Communication and Adolescent Well‐Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 1169-1182.

45.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007b). Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental psychology, 43, 267.

46.

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23, 3-43.

47.

Wei, M., Russell, D. W, & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult Attachment, Social Self-Efficacy, Self- Disclosure, Loneliness, and Subsequent Depression for Freshman College Students: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Counseling psychology, 52, 602.

48.

Worthy, M., Gary, A. L, & Kahn, G. M. (1969). Self-disclosure as an exchange process. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 13, 59.

49.

Wright, K. B. (2004). On‐line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively internet‐based and primarily internet‐based relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-253.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책