The Role of Relationship Closeness and Expectance-Congruency in Empathy

박찬; 최훈석

doi:10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.006

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

Apply for Authority
P-ISSN1229-0653
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.27 No.2

Citation Share

The Role of Relationship Closeness and Expectance-Congruency in Empathy

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;

2013, v.27 no.2, pp.85-105

https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.006

& (2013). The Role of Relationship Closeness and Expectance-Congruency in Empathy. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 27(2), 85-105, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.2.006

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

The present study assumes that individuals possess concrete scripts regarding appropriate ways of empathizing with others depending on the nature of the relationship with the target. It further assumes that people utilize these scripts in evaluating the appropriateness of a particular mode of empathy in a given interpersonal setting. Based on a pilot study examining college students' lay theories of empathy associated with varying degrees of relational closeness, we identified the depth of empathy as a key determinant of the appropriateness judgment. We hypothesized that deep (shallow) levels of empathy and corresponding expressions by the empathizer would be considered appropriate in a close (distant) relationship (expectancy-congruent empathy). In contrast, we expected that shallow (deep) levels of empathy and corresponding expressions by the empathizer would be considered inappropriate in a close (distant) relationship (expectancy-incongruent empathy). Accordingly, we predicted that expectancy-congruent empathy would lead to higher levels of relationship satisfaction than would expectancy-incongruent empathy. By manipulating the degree of relationship closeness with the target (close vs. distant) and the depth of empathy (deep vs. shallow), we found supportive evidence for our predictions both on the part of the target (Experiment 1) and the empathizer (Experiment 2). Implications of the findings and future directions were discussed.

keywords: relationship closeness, empathy, expectancy-congruent empathy, relationship satisfaction, emotions, 관계 친밀도, 공감, 기대-일치 공감, 관계 만족, 정서

Reference

김기범, 김미희, 최상진 (2002). 한국인의 대인관계에서의 기본도덕으로서의 의리분석: 한국인에게 진정한 친구는 의리 있는 친구인가. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8(1), 79-101.

박인조, 민경환 (2005). 한국어 감정단어의 목록 작성과 차원 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 109-129.

손영미, 최상진 (1999). 심정적 대화상황분석을 통한 심정심리분석. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구 논문.

조긍호 (2008). 선진유학사상의 심리학적 함의. 서울: 서강대학교 출판부.

최상진 (2000). 한국인 심리학. 서울: 중앙대학교 출판부.

최상진, 김기범 (1999). 한국인의 self 특성: 서구의 self 개념과 대비를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 275-292.

한규석, 최상진 (2008). 마음의 연구와 심리학: 마음의 문화심리적 분석에 바탕한 심리의 작용 틀. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(2), 281- 307.

한덕웅 (2003). 한국유학심리학. 서울: 시그마프레스.

한덕웅, 강혜자 (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 19(2), 63-99.

10.

허태균, 김일도, 서에스더 (2009). 내맘 알지?: 마음읽기 기대에 관한 탐색적 연구. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 발표논문집, 164-165.

11.

Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships, New York: Holt.

12.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smolland, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.

13.

Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.

14.

Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

15.

Batson, C. D. (1994). Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603-610.

16.

Batson, C. D., Duncan, B., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 290-302.

17.

Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758.

18.

Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy- induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042-1054.

19.

Batson, C. D., O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. (1983). Self-reported distress and empathy and egoistic versus altruistic motivation for helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706-718.

20.

Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 495-509.

21.

Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494.

22.

Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 36, 752-766.

23.

Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713-726.

24.

Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol. E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1625-1635.

25.

Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119.

26.

Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265-284.

27.

Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderation role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 594-603.

28.

Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-124.

29.

Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favorism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.

30.

Galinsky, A. D., Wang, C. S., & Ku, G. (2008). Perspective takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 404-419.

31.

Håkansson, J., & Montgomery, H. (2002). The role of action in empathy from the perspectives of the empathizer and the target. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8, 50-62.

32.

Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 398-409.

33.

Hodges, S. D., & Wegner, D. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. In W. Ickes (Ed). Empathic accuracy (pp.311-334). New York: The Guilford Press.

34.

Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587-610.

35.

Kerem, E., Fishman, N., & Josselson, R. (2001). The experience of empathy in everyday relationships: Cognitive and affective elements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 709-729.

36.

Kim, H., & Markus, H. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800.

37.

Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 792- 798.

38.

Malle, B. F., & Pearce, G. E. (2001). Attention to behavioral events during interaction: Two actor- observer gaps and three attempts to close them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 278-294.

39.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

40.

Shah, J. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.

41.

Stinson, L., & Ickes, W. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787-797.

42.

Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281-292.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.27 No.2

The Role of Relationship Closeness and Expectance-Congruency in Empathy

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology