Is a Satisfactory Tax System Possible?: Bounded Rationality and Selfishness in Tax Decision

이진안; 최승혁; 허태균

doi:10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.3.010

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

Apply for Authority
P-ISSN1229-0653
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.27 No.3

Citation Share

Is a Satisfactory Tax System Possible?: Bounded Rationality and Selfishness in Tax Decision

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;

2013, v.27 no.3, pp.175-191

https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.3.010

& (2013). Is a Satisfactory Tax System Possible?: Bounded Rationality and Selfishness in Tax Decision. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 27(3), 175-191, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.3.010

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

The present research aimed to examine tax payers’ rationality and selfishness in their judgment of tax system. We developed a standard scenario describing the average Korean tax payer and then 15 versions of scenarios varying on tax-irrelevant factors such as nationality, education, occupation, housing type, income source, political attitudes, and criminal records including income which is crucial for tax imposing. 1,361 Korean adults read one of these scenarios and reported estimates of proper amount of income tax in rate. The analyses revealed a significant difference in imposed tax rate between types of housing type. That is, the participants imposed higher tax rate toward house owners than tenants. And, income level and occupation interacted in impacts on imposed tax rate. Imposed tax rates were increased toward professionals as the income increased, but the trend was not the case for office workers and self-employers. Most interestingly, people imposed lower tax rate when they perceived the income levels of scenarios similar to theirs own income. These results indicated that taxpayers often make an irrational and selfish judgment on the fair tax system. We discussed social psychological contribution to enhance social consensus and subjectively fairness in tax system.

keywords: tax perception, adequate tax rate, irrationality, self-serving tendency, in-group bias, 세금 지각, 적정 세율, 비합리성, 이기성, 내집단 편향

Reference

교육과학기술부 (2011. 8. 17). 2011년 교육기본통계 조사 결과 발표.

김동수, 김옥환, 이상헌, 정태연 (2011). 한국인의 소득양극화 원인과 해결책에 대한 인식유형. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 17(4), 461-483.

김진섭 (2008). 납세자와 세무대리인의 세무인식 분석. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 8(10), 142-150.

박명호, 정재호 (2011). 공정사회와 조세정책. 한국조세연구원.

박성배, 홍정화, 김선구 (2007). 소득세율 체계와 과세표준 구간의 공평성에 대한 세무전문가집단의 인식도 연구. 대한회계학회, 12(2), 311-340.

배수진, 심태섭 (2011). 납세자의 세무신고의사결정에 영향을 미치는 경제적․비경제적 요인에 대한 연구동향: 실험연구를 중심으로. 세무와회계저널, 12(3), 215-273.

부산일보 (2012. 5. 2.). [‘청소년 기자’ 광장] “외국인 노동자 차별․편견 사라지길”.

연합뉴스 (2010. 10. 6). 직장인 66% “나, 세금 많이 낸다”

연합뉴스 (2011. 2. 6). 韓 조세부담률 OECD 8번째로 낮아.

10.

이삼식, 장경섭, 김선업, 이병훈, 송다영, 박종서, 김은정, 최효진 (2011). 저출산․고령화와 사회갈등. 서울: 사회통합위원회.

11.

지성근 (1991). 납세자의 조세저항행위와 그 대응방안에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 경영대학 세무학과, 4, 133-156.

12.

최승혁, 허태균 (2012). 잘난 사람의 범죄는?: 처벌판단에서 사회경제적 지위의 역할과 그 심리기제. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 26(4), 127-140.

13.

통계청 (2011. 12. 14). 2012년 사회조사 결과.

14.

통계청 (2012. 3. 21). 인구․가구 구조와 주거 특성 변화(보도자료).

15.

한국주택금융공사 (2011). 주택금융 및 보금자리론 수요실태조사.

16.

Brewer, B. M. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307-324.

17.

Dunlop, L. W., & Beauchamp, R. M. (2011). Does similarity make a difference?: Predicting cohesion and attendance behaviors within exercise group settings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(3), 258-266.

18.

Fiske, T. S. & Taylor, E. S. (2008). Social Cognition. NY: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Funder, C. D. (1987). Errors and mistkes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 75-90.

20.

Gigerenze, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. NY: Viking.

21.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.

22.

Kuiper An. N. & Rogers, B. T. (1979). Encoding of personal inforamtion: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 499-514.

23.

Lane, M. I., & Messe, A. L. (1972). Distribution of insufficient, sufficient, and oversufficient rewards: A clarification of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 228-233.

24.

Locke D. K., Craig, T., Baik, K. & Gohil, K. (2012). Binds and bounds of communion; Effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 879-897.

25.

Martin, P. S. (1994). Rationalizing the Irrational: The Treatment of Untenable Federal Civil Jury Verdicts. Creighton Law Review, 28, 683-732.

26.

Messik, M. D., & Sentis, P. K. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418-434.

27.

Mezulis, H A., Abramson, Y. L., Hyde, S. J., & Hankin, L. B. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions?: A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711-747.

28.

Montoya, M. R., & Horton, S. R. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 696-712.

29.

Myers, G. D. (2008). Social Psychology. NY: McGraw-Hill.

30.

Perilloux, C., Easton, A. J. & Buss, M. (2012). The misperception of sexual interest. Psychological Science, 23(2), 146-151.

31.

Robert, V. J. (2008). The role of criminal record in the sentencing process. Crime and Justice, 22, 303-362.

32.

Rogers, B. T., Kuiper, A. N. & Kirker, S. W. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677-688.

33.

Ross, D. L., Amabile, M. T., & Steinmetz, L. J. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 485-494.

34.

Savitsky, K., van Boven, L., Epley, N., & Wight, M. W. (2005). The unpacking effect in alloations of reponsibility for group tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 447-457.

35.

Simon, A. H. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and Organiation (pp.161-176). North-Holland Publishing Company.

36.

Taylor, E. S., & Brown, D. J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193-210.

37.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.

38.

Van Baaren, B. R., Holland, W. R., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 393-398.

39.

Winkler, D. J. & Taylor, E. S. (1979). Preference, expectations, and attributional bias: Two field studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9(2), 183-197.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.27 No.3

Is a Satisfactory Tax System Possible?: Bounded Rationality and Selfishness in Tax Decision

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology