바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

평균 이상 효과에서 문화차의 발생 조건과 설명 기제

Condition and Mechanism of Cultural Differences in the Better-Than-Average Effect

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2014, v.28 no.3, pp.127-143
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.3.008
이종택 (동양미래대학교)

초록

본 연구는 평균 이상 효과(자신을 평균보다 더 낫다고 간주하는 경향)에서 문화적 차이의 발생 조건을 탐구하고, 그 기제를 확인해 보는 것이 주요 목적이다. 동아시아 문화권을 대표하여 한국인을, 그리고 서양 문화권을 대표하여 한국 거주 서구인을 연구대상으로 삼았다. 연구 1에서 연구자는 평균 이상 효과의 크기에서 한국인과 서구인 사이에 문화적 차이가 발생한다는 사실을 밝혀냈다. 전반적으로 한국인들이 서구인들에 비하여 더 낮은 수준의 평균 이상 효과를 보였으나, 긍정적 특성에서는 한국인들도 서구인들처럼 상당한 크기의 평균 이상 효과를 보였다. 부정적 특성에서는 2010년 자료에서 한국인들이 평균 이상 효과를 보이지 않았던 반면에, 2014년 자료에서 약간의 평균 이상 효과를 보였다. 이것은 4년이 지나면서 한국인들이 더욱 서구화되고 있다는 지표로 해석될 여지가 있다. 부정적 특성에서 한국인들이 평균 이상 효과를 보이지 않거나 적게 보이는 근거의 하나로 겸손 규범을 고려해 보았다. 연구 2에서 직접적으로 겸손 동기를 부각시키면 평균 이상 효과가 낮아지는지를 실험으로 검증하고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 자신보다 상대방을 더 높이는 겸손 동기를 조작하면, 특히 부정적 특성에서 평균 이상 효과가 사라진다는 사실이 확인되었으며, 이것은 서구인들도 마찬가지였다. 이 발견사실은 한국과 같은 동양문화권에서는 자신의 단점을 찾아서 개선함으로써 자신을 향상시키려는 동기가 작용했기 때문일 수 있음을 시사한다. 이 연구 결과의 의의 및 제한점이 논의되었다.

keywords
Better-than-average effect, Cultural differences, Modesty norm, Negative traits, Self-improvement motive, 평균 이상 효과, 문화차, 겸손규범, 부정적 특성, 자기 향상 동기

Abstract

The present study examined when cultural differences in the better-than-average effect (the tendency to view oneself as better than average) would vary with trait desirability and why the differences would occurred. The researcher used Koreans and Westerners in Korea as representatives of East Asian and Western cultures, respectively. In Study 1, the author found that the magnitude of cultural difference in the better-than-average effect varied between Westerners and Koreans. While Korean participants failed to exhibit the better-than- average effect for any negative trait in 2010 year data, they showed the effect for negative traits in 2014 year data. In contrast, Westerners tended to display the better-than-average effect more than Koreans, and cultural difference was greater for negative traits than for positive traits. In Study 2 to pin down the underlying mechanism that gives rise to cultural differences, it was found that the other-enhancing orientation of the modesty norm influenced the cross-cultural difference. Westerners as well as Koreans did not show the better-than-average effect under the enhancement of the modesty norm. The findings indicate that Koreans of East Asian culture motivate to correct their own defects and improve themselves. Implications of the results and suggestions of the future studies were discussed.

keywords
Better-than-average effect, Cultural differences, Modesty norm, Negative traits, Self-improvement motive, 평균 이상 효과, 문화차, 겸손규범, 부정적 특성, 자기 향상 동기

참고문헌

1.

이선경, 팔로마 베나비데스, 허용회 및 박선웅 (2014). 자기애 시대의 도래: 한국 대학생들의 자기애 성향 증가. 2014년 한국 사회 및 성격심리학회 춘계학술대회. pp. 5-11.

2.

Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.

3.

Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., & Yurak, T. J. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.

4.

Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.

5.

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

6.

Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.

7.

Brewer, M. B., & Reeder, G. D. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.

8.

Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluation of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.

9.

Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 634-654). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

11.

Cai, H., Sedikides, C., Gaetner, L., Wang, C., Carvallo, M., Xu, Y., O'Mara, E. M., & Jackson, L, E. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in China: Is modesty at the service of self- enhancement in East Asian culture? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 59-64.

12.

Cai, H., Sedikides, C., Gaetner, L., Wang, C., Carvallo, M., Xu, Y., O'Mara, & Jackson, L. E. (2011). Tactical Self-Enhancement in China: Is Modesty at the Service of Self-Enhancement in East Asian Culture? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 59-64

13.

Campbell, J. D. (1986). Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 281-294.

14.

Chang, E. C. (1996). Cultural differences in optimism, pessimism, and coping: Predictors of subsequent adjustment in Asian American and Caucasian American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 113-123.

15.

Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H., Chan, B., Tang, D., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Behavioral manifestations of modesty. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 603-626.

16.

Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Mazuerea Arias, R., Rincon, B. C., Vargas-Flores, J. J., Ibanez-Reyes, J., Wang, L., Alvarez, J. M., Wang, C., & Ortiz, F. A. (2014). A four-culture study of self-enhancement and adjustment using the social relations model: Do alternative conceptualizations and indices make a difference? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 997-1014.

17.

Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusion foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3-20.

18.

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory(NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory(NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

19.

Cross, P. (1977). Not can but will college teaching be improved? New Directions for Higher Education, 17, 1-15.

20.

Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definition in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.

21.

Felson, R. B. (1981). Ambiguity and bias in the self-concept. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 64-69.

22.

Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & Chang, K. (2008). On pancultural self-enhancement Well-adjusted Taiwanese self-enhance on personally valued traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 463-477.

23.

Gidron, D., Koehler, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1993). Implicit quantification of personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 594-604.

24.

Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110-1126.

25.

Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.

26.

Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influences of cultural individualism- collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.

27.

Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1-24.

28.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more invulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 595-607.

29.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268-1283.

30.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). Culture, self-discrepancies, and self-satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 915-925.

31.

Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., & Lehman, D. R. (2001). Cultural differences in self-evaluation: Japanese readily accept negative self-relevant information. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 434-443.

32.

Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivation and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599-615.

33.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.

34.

Heine, S. J., Takata, T., & Lehman, D. R (2000). Beyond self-presentation: Evidence for self- criticism among Japanese. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 442-451.

35.

Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.

36.

Jones. E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219-266.

37.

Kim, Y. H., Chiu, C. Y., Peng, S., Cai, H., & Tov, W. (2010). Explaining East-West differences in the likelihood of making favorable self- evaluations: The role of evaluation apprehension and directness of expression. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 40, 62-75.

38.

Kitayama, S., & Karasawa, M. (1995). Self: A cultural psychological perspective. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 113-165.

39.

Kitayama, S., & Uchida, Y. (2003). Explicit self- criticism and implicit self-regard: Evaluating self and friend in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 476-482.

40.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.

41.

Lalwani, A. K., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. (2006). What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 165-178.

42.

Lee, J. (2012). Trait desirability and cultural difference in the better-than-average effect. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 261-272.

43.

Lee, J. W., Yates, J. F., Shinotsuka, H., Singh, R., Onglatco, M. L. U., Yen, N. S., Gupta, M., & Bhatnagar, D. (1995). Cross-national differences in overconfidence. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 63-69.

44.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991a). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

45.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991b). Cultural variation in self-concept. In G. R. Goethals & J. Strauss (Eds.), The self: interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18-48). New York: Springer-Verlag.

46.

Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411-425.

47.

Matlin, M., & Stang, D., (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

48.

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why, NY: Free Press.

49.

O’Mara, E. M., Gaetner, L., Sedikides, C., Zhou, X., & Liu, Y. (2012). A longitudinal-experimental test of the panculturality of self-enhancement: Self-enhancement promotes psychological well- being both in the west and the east. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 157-163

50.

Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.

51.

Pualengco, R. P., Chiu, C. Y., & Kim, Y. H.(2009). Cultural variations in preemptive effort downplaying and effects on self-evaluations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 12-19.

52.

Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.

53.

Ryff, C., Lee, Y., & Na, K. (1995). Through the lens of culture: Psychological well-being at midlife. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin.

54.

Schmutte, D. M., Lee, Y. H., & Ryff, C. D. (1995). Reflections on parenthood: A cultural perspective. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

55.

Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.

56.

Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17-36.

57.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-79.

58.

Sedikides, C., Gaetner, L, & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-70.

59.

Sedikides, C., Gaetner, L, & Vevea, J. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine(2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539-551.

60.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143-148.

61.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193- 210.

62.

White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2005). Culture and social comparison seeking: The role of self- motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 232-242.

63.

Yeh, C. (1995). A cultural perspective on interdependence in self and morality: A Japan-US comparison. Unpublished manuscript. Stanford University.

64.

Yoshida, T., Kojo, K., & Kaku, H. (1982). A study on the development of self-presentation in children. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 120-127.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격