바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.3
Citation Share

Effects of the Number of Trials on Test Results in P300-based Concealed Information Test

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2014, v.28 no.3, pp.61-79
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.3.004


& (2014). Effects of the Number of Trials on Test Results in P300-based Concealed Information Test. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 28(3), 61-79, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.3.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The number of trials can influence P300-based concealed information test (P300-based CIT) in two ways. First, as the number of trial increases, the P300 amplitude is likely to reduce due to habituation. If P300 amplitude decreases, accuracy rate of P300 CIT would be declined. Second, as the number of trial increases, the power of test increases and then the accuracy rate would also be increased. This study is to verify whether the accuracy rate of P300 CIT declines or improves as the number of trials increases. After twenty-four participants performed a mock crime, lie detection test was administered to them by using the P300 CIT. Half of the participants was exposed to photo stimuli, and the other half was presented with letter stimuli. A target stimulus, a probe stimulus, and four irrelevant stimuli were presented 30 times in one block, and four blocks were presented to each participant. Contrary to our expectation, P300 amplitude to the target stimulus was smallest in the first block and was largest in the fourth block. P300 amplitude to the relevant stimulus and to the irrelevant stimuli tended to decrease slightly at the second half of the experiment. In bootstrapped amplitude difference tests, there was no significant difference in the accuracy rate as the number of blocks increase. In bootstrapped correlation difference tests, the accuracy rate tended to be lower when only the first block was used, compared to that when several blocks were included. There was no significant difference between the photo stimuli and the letter stimuli in both bootstrapped tests. Reasons why P300 amplitude by a target stimulus was increased and the bootstrapped correlation difference tests were impacted by the number of trials were discussed.

keywords
P300, 숨긴정보검사, 습관화, 시행수, P300, concealed information test, habituation, the number of trials

Reference

1.

김영윤 (2009). P300-기반 거짓말 탐지 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23, 111-129.

2.

서상규 (1998). 현대한국어의 어휘빈도 (상‧하). 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원 내부보고서(CLID-WP-98-02-28).

3.

엄진섭 (2010). 사건관련전위를 이용한 숨긴정보검사에서 P300의 진폭에 영향을 미치는 요인. 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위청구논문.

4.

Abootalebi, V., Moradi, M. H., & Khalilzadeh, M. A. (2006). A comparison of methods for ERP assessment in a P300-based GKT. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 309-320.

5.

Allen, J. J., Iacono, W. G., & Danielson, K. D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504-522.

6.

Ben-Shakhar, G. & Furedy, J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.

7.

Bourbon, W. T., Will, K. W., Gary, H. E., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (1987). Habituation of auditory event-related potentials: a comparison of self-initiated and automated stimulus trains. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 160-166.

8.

Cohen, J. & Polich, J. (1997). On the number of trials needed for P300. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 249-255.

9.

Cutmore, T. R. H., Djakovic, T., Kebbell, M. R., & Shum, D. H. K. (2009). An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 185-192.

10.

Donchin, E. & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.

11.

Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.

12.

Farwell, L. A. & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related Potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.

13.

Gamer, M. & Berti, S. (2010). Task relevance and recognition of concealed information have different influences on electrodermal activity and event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 47, 355-364.

14.

Hauk, O. & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.

15.

Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.

16.

Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19-56.

17.

Kubo, K. & Nittono, H. (2009). The role of intention to conceal in the P300-based concealed information test. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 227-235.

18.

Lin, E. & Polich, J. (1999). P300 habituation patterns: Individual differences from ultradian rhythms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 1111- 1125.

19.

Lindin, M., Zurron, M., & Diaz, F. (2004). Changes in P300 amplitude during an active standard auditory oddball task. Biological Psychology, 66, 153-167.

20.

Meijer, E. H., Smulders, F. T. Y., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., & Wolf, A. G. (2007). The P300 is sensitive to concealed face recognition. International Journal of Psychology, 66, 231-237.

21.

Mertens, R. & Allen, J. J. (2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45, 286- 298.

22.

Ochoa, C. J. & Polich, J. (2000). P300 and blink instructions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 93-98.

23.

Pan, J., Yakeshita, T., & Morimoto, K. (2000). P300 hanituation from auditory single-stimulus and oddbass pradigms. Igkrp nternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 37, 149-153.

24.

Patrick, B. (1995). Probability and measure, John Wiley & Sons.

25.

Pham, T. T. H., Croft, R. J., Cadusch, P. J., & Barry, R. J. (2011). A test of four EOG correction methods using an improved validation technique. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 203-210.

26.

Polich, J. (1989). Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology, 17, 19-28.

27.

Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.

28.

Ravden, D. & Polich, J. (1998). Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 30, 359-365.

29.

Riggins, B. R. & Polich, J. (2002). Habituation of P3a and P3b from visual stimuli. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 71-81.

30.

Romero, R. & Polich, J. (1996). P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli. Physiology & Behavior, 59, 517-522.

31.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Biroschak, J. R., & Furedy, J. J. (2006). P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 60, 251- 259.

32.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Shue, E., & Singer, E. (2007). Single versus multiple probe blocks of P300-based concealed information tests for autobiographical versus incidentally learned information. Biological Psychology, 74, 396-404.

33.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205-219.

34.

Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.

35.

Seymour, T. L., Fraynt, B. R., (2009). Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 177-187.

36.

Seymour, T. L., Kerlin, J. R. (2008). Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 475-490.

37.

Seymour, T. L., Seifert, C. M., Shafto, M. G., & Mosmann, A. L. (2000). Using response time measures to assess “Guilty Knowledge”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 30-37.

38.

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. Pergamon Press.

39.

Soskins, M., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Niendam, T. (2001). The case for peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at .3 hz high pass filter settings in detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 173-180.

40.

Small, J. G. (1971). Sensory evoked responses of autistic children. Infantile Autism, 224-129.

41.

Verleger, R. (1991). The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 240-251.

42.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T., & Rosseel, Y. (2010). Detecting concealed information with reaction time: Validity and comparison with the polygraph. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 991-1002.

43.

Verschuere, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Winograd, M., Labkovsky, E., & Wiersema, R. (2009). The role of deception in P300 memory detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 253-262.

44.

Visu-Petra, G., Miclea, M., & Visu-Petra, L. (2012). Reaction time-based detection of concealed information in relation to individual differences in executive functioning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 342-351.

45.

Wasserman, S. & Bockenholt, U. (1989). Bootstrapping: Applications to psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 26, 208-221.

46.

Wesensten, M. J., Badia, P., & Harsh, J. (1990). Time of day, repeated testing, and interblock interval effects on P300 amplitude. Physiology & Behavior, 47, 653-658.

47.

Winograd. M. R. & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). Mock crime application of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 48, 155-161.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy