바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.28 No.3
Citation Share

비정의, 보복적 정의, 회복적 정의 조건에서 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추의 차이

Difference in Perception of Injustice, Negative Emotion, and Rumination by Justice Types

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2014, v.28 no.3, pp.81-92
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.3.005
신재은 (중앙대학교)
현명호 (중앙대학교)
박지선 (부산가톨릭대학교)
신재은, 현명호, & 박지선. (2014). 비정의, 보복적 정의, 회복적 정의 조건에서 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 28(3), 81-92, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.3.005
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 가해사건에 대한 비정의, 보복적 정의 및 회복적 정의 조건에 따라서 가해사건의 피해자가 느끼는 정의 회복의 정도인 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추 정도의 차이를 알아보기 위해 수행되었다. 연구를 위해 대학생 55명이 참가하였으며 참가자들이 피해자의 입장을 직접적으로 경험할 수 있도록 실험을 설계하여 가상적인 경제적 피해상황을 구성하였다. 정의 조건에 따른 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추 정도의 차이를 알아보기 위해 다변량분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 집단 간의 차이가 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 회복적 정의 조건은 다른 정의 조건보다 부정적 정서와 반추를 더 적게 지각하였다. 본 연구에서는 실험을 통해 각 정의 조건을 구분하여 보복적 정의와 회복적 정의가 피해자에게 미치는 영향을 보다 경험적으로 탐색했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

keywords
피해상황, 보복적 정의, 회복적 정의, 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추, injustice, retributive justice, restorative justice, negative emotion, rumination

Abstract

The present study examined the differences in perception of injustice, negative emotion, and situational specific rumination between justice conditions of no justice, retributive justice and restorative justice. Participants(N=55) experienced a supposed economical injustice as victims in the experimental situation. This study concerned how victims respond differently according to justice conditions. Results indicated that there were significant differences by justice condition. Negative emotion and rumination were less responded in restorative condition than other justice conditions. The results showed that restorative justice had positive influence on victim in terms of recovering their negative responses through a communication between victim and offender. The results also suggested that communication including offender’s apology played a essential role in victim’s restoration in the restorative justice context. Future directions concerning the meaning and possible implication of restorative justice are discussed. In addition, the limitation of this study are followed.

keywords
피해상황, 보복적 정의, 회복적 정의, 불공평함의 지각, 부정적 정서, 반추, injustice, retributive justice, restorative justice, negative emotion, rumination

참고문헌

1.

김기범, 임효진 (2006). 대인관계 용서의 심리적 과정 탐색: 공감과 사과가 용서에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(2), 19-33.

2.

이수정, 강윤희 (2002). 범죄자 피해보상 제도에 대한 제언: 정신, 심리적 지원체제를 중심으로. 피해자학 연구, 10(2), 189-208.

3.

전소현, 권호인, 권정혜 (2010). 분노에 대한 반추, 주의 분산 및 긍정적 재평가가 기분과 혈압에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(2), 367-386.

4.

Armour, M. P., & Umbreit, M. S. (2005). The paradox of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp.491-503). New York: Routledge.

5.

Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768-813.

6.

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Sydney, Australia: Cambridge University Press

7.

Carlsmith, K. M., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1316-1324.

8.

Cohen, R. L. (2001). Provocations of restorative justice. Social Justice Research, 14, 09-232.

9.

Keele, K. D. (1948). The pain chart. The Lancet, 2, 6-8.

10.

Kurki, L. (2000). Restorative and community justice in the United States, Crime and Just, 27, 235.

11.

Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 59, 952-959.

12.

Marshall, T. F. (2003). Restorative justice: An overview. In G. Johnstone (Ed.), A restorative justice reader: Texts, sources, and context(pp. 28-45), Willan Publishing, Portland, OR.

13.

Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 9, pp. 1–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336.

15.

McCullough, M, E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and big five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 601-610.

16.

Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1988). Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

17.

Rippere, V. (1977). “What is the thing to do when you’'re feeling depressed?”: A pilot study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 15, 185-191.

18.

Strang, H. (2002). Repair and revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

19.

Strelan, P., Feather N. T., & McKee, I. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1538-1544.

20.

Sukhodilsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 687-700.

21.

Umbreit, M. S. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.

22.

Umbreit, M. S. (2001). The handbook of victim offender mediation: An essential guide to practice and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

23.

Vidmar, N. (2000). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31-63). New York: Kluwer-Plenum.

24.

Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2002). Overcoming interpersonal offenses: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness? Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 343-353.

25.

Wade, N. G., Vogel, D. L., Liao, K., & Goldman, D. (2008). Measuring state-specific rumination: Development of the Rumination about an Interpersonal Offense Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 419-426.

26.

Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32(5), 375-389.

27.

Witvliet, V. O., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Root, M., Sato, F., Ludwig, E., & Exline, J. (2008). Retributive justice, restorative justice, and forgiveness: An experimental psychology analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 10-25.

28.

Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2000). Is there a place for forgiveness in the justice system? Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27, 1721-1734.

29.

Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York: Brunner Routledge.

30.

Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2009). A just forgiveness: Responsible healing without excusing injustice. IL: Inter Varsity Press.

31.

Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The social psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385-418.

32.

Worthington, E. L. Jr., Berry, J. W., & Parrot, L. (2001). Unforgiveness, forgiveness, religion, and health. In T. G. Plante & A. C. Sherman (Eds.), Faith and Health: Psychological Perspectives(pp. 107-138). New York: Guilford.

33.

Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책