바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.2
Citation Share

Effects of Countermeasures on P300-based Concealed Information Test with Short Inter-Stimulus Interval

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.2, pp.91-108
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.2.006




& (2015). Effects of Countermeasures on P300-based Concealed Information Test with Short Inter-Stimulus Interval. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 29(2), 91-108, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.2.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study was to test whether P300 CIT, which has one prove and 1s inter-stimulus interval affected by countermeasures. Also, it was to investigate the method for the detection of countermeasure. The effect of countermeasures was tested under the condition where the participants were asked to respond to a particular irrelevant (1CM condition) and respond to two particular irrelevants (2CM condition) out of four irrelevants. We used both physical countermeasure whether the participants were required to wiggling their fingers or toes and mental countermeasure whether the participants were required to calling his or her mother's name in mind. The results showed the use of physical and mental countermeasures influence on the detection rate in P300 CIT. When the countermeasures were not used, the detection rate was 73% in P300 CIT. The detection rate was 0 % and 14 % in 1CM condition and 2 CM condition respectively, when the physical countermeasures were used. The detection rate was 14% both in 1CM condition and 2 CM condition when the mental countermeasures were used. The detectability of the countermeasures was evaluated from correlation coefficients among ERPs. We tested whether the correlation coefficients between ERPs from irrelevant and target were greater than the correlation coefficients between ERPs from irrelevant and probe for the cases incorrectly evaluated as not lying. One hundred percent in the group of physical countermeasure and 92% in the group of mental countermeasure were included while 33% in the group of guilt were included in the criteria. The possibility for the detection of countermeasure by using correlation coefficients among ERPs was discussed.

keywords
P300, 숨긴정보검사, 거짓말탐지, 대응수단, P300, Concealed information test, Lie detection, Countermeasure

Reference

1.

이병하, 황순택, 박광배, 손진훈, 엄진섭 (2013). P300 숨긴정보검사와 자극간 제시간격:500ms와 800ms, 3000ms의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27, 87-107.

2.

엄진섭 (2010). 사건관련전위를 이용한 숨긴정보검사에서 P300의 진폭에 영향을 미치는 요인. 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위청구논문.

3.

엄진섭, 음영지, 장은정, 정이내, 손진훈 (2015). P300 숨긴정보검사와 대응수단. 감성과학, 18, 39-48.

4.

Abootalebi, V., Moradi, M. H., & Khalilzadeh, M. A. (2006). A comparison of methods for ERP assessment in a P300-based GKT. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 309-320.

5.

Allen, J. J., Iacono, W. G., & Danielson, K. D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504-522.

6.

Ben-Shakhar, G. (2011). Countermeasures. Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test, 200-214.

7.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Dolve, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273-281.

8.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). The guilty knowledge test (GKT) as an application of psychophysiology: Future prospects and obstacles. In Murray Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing (pp.87-102). San Diego: Academic Press.

9.

Cutmore, T. R. H., Djakovic, T., Kebbell, M. R., & Shum, D. H. K. (2009). An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 185-192.

10.

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the boostrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

11.

Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”)with event-related Potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.

12.

Hagen, F. H., Gatherwright, J. R., Lopez, B. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from visual stimlui:Task difficulty effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 59, 8-14.

13.

Hont, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbuch, M., & Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84-92.

14.

Hont, C. R., & Kircher, J. C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the acuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252-259.

15.

Hu, X., Hegeman, D., Landry, E., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2012). Increasing the number of irrelevant stimuli increases ability to detect countermeasures to the P300-based complex trial protocol for concealed information detection. Psychophysiology, 49, 85-95.

16.

Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.

17.

Kirk, R. E. (2012). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.) . Los Angeles: Sage.

18.

Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP)reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19-56.

19.

Kramer, A. F., Sirevaag, E. J., & Braune, R. (1987). A psychological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Human factors, 29, 145-160.

20.

Labkovsky, E., & Rosenfeld. J. P. (2012). The P300-based, complex trial protocol for concealed information detection resists any number of sequential countermeasures against up to five irrelevant stimuli. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 1-10.

21.

Lefebvre, C. D., Marchand, Y., Smith, S. M., & Connolly, J. F. (2009). Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 218-225.

22.

Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MA: MIT Press.

23.

Lui, M., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2008). Detection of deception about multiple, concealed, mock crime items, based on a spatial-temporal analysis of ERP amplitude and scalp distribution. Psychophysiology, 45, 721-730.

24.

Meixner, J. B., Labkovsky, E., Rosenfeld, J. P., Winograd, M., Sokolovsky, A., Weishaar, J., Ullmann, t. (2013). P900: A putative novel ERP component that indexed countermeasure use in the P300-based concealed information test. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 38, 121-132.

25.

Meixner, J. B., Haynes, A., Winograd, M. R., Brown, J., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2009). Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the P300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: Task demand effects. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 209-220.

26.

Meixner, J. B., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2010). Countermeasure mechanisms in a P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 47, 57-65.

27.

Mertens, R., & Allen, J. J. (2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments:Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45, 286-298.

28.

Podlesny, J. A., (2003). A paucity of operable case facts restricts appbleability of the guilty knowledge technique in FBI criminal polygraph examinations. Forensic Science Communleations, 5, Retieved March 29, 2012, from http://www2.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2003/podlesny.htm.

29.

Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.

30.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Biroschak, J. R., & Furedy, J. J. (2006). P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 251-259.

31.

Rosenfeld, J. P., & Labkovsky, E. (2010). New P300-based protocol to detect concealed information: Resistance to mental countermeasures against only half the irrelevant stimuli and a possible ERP indicator of countermeasures. Psychophysiology, 47, 1002-1010.

32.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winogard, M., Lui, M. A., Vandenboom, C., & Chedid, E. (2008). The complex trial protocol(CTP): A new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate, P300-based method for detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 45, 906-919.

33.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205-219.

34.

Sasaki, M., Hira, S., and Matsuda, T. (2001). Effects of mental countermeasure on the physiological detection using the event-related brain potentials. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 72, 322-328.

35.

Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., Schmidt, W. F., & Kok, A. (1999). Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: Reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated. Psychophysiology, 36, 118-125.

36.

Squire, N. K., Squire, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.

37.

Verschuere, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Winograd, M., Labkovsky, E., & Wiersema, R. (2009). The role of deception in P300 memory detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 253-262.

38.

Wasserman, S., & Bockenholt, U. (1989). Boostrapping: Applications to psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 26, 208-221.

39.

Winograd, M. R., & Rosenfeld, J, P. (2010). Mock crime application of the Complex Trical Protocol (CTP) P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 47, 1-7.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy