바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.3
Citation Share

한국판 조절초점 척도 타당화 연구

A Study of The Validity of Korean Versions of Regulatory Focus Scale

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.3, pp.85-110
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.005
김세나 (아주대학교)
표두미 (아주대학교)
이지선 (아주대학교)
이준기 (아주대학교)
민준호 (아주대학교)
신강현 (아주대학교)
김경일 (아주대학교)
김세나, 표두미, 이지선, 이준기, 민준호, 신강현, & 김경일. (2015). 한국판 조절초점 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(3), 85-110, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.005
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

Higgins(1997)는 인간의 경험을 기반으로 형성된 두 가지 다른 형태의 동기인 조절초점을 제안했다. 본 연구에서는 Higgins, Friedman, Harlow, Idson, Ayduk, Taylor(2001)가 제작한 성향적인(chronic)1) 조절초점 척도인 RFQ(Regulatory Focus Questionnaire)를 한국어로 번안하여 타당화하였다. 연구 1에서는 RFQ의 요인구조 탐색을 위해 대학생 208명(연구 1-a)과 225명(연구 1-b)의 설문자료를 각각 수집하고 두 번의 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 구성개념의 정의와 요인분석 결과를 감안해 2문항을 제외한 2요인 구조가 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 연구 2-a에서는 274명의 대학생 자료를 재표집하여 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 연구 1에서 나타난 요인구조가 확증되었다. 연구 2-b에서는 관련 구성개념과의 수렴 및 변별타당도를 확인하였고, 마지막으로 연구 3에서는 대학생 120명의 자료를 수집하여 준거변인을 설명하는 동시타당도를 확인하였다. 본 연구의 주요결과와 시사점을 논의에서 자세히 다루었다.

keywords
조절초점, 향상초점, 예방초점, 만성적 조절초점, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, chronic regulatory focus

Abstract

Higgins(1997) proposed regulatory focus theory comprises two types of motivation formed by one's personal experience. In this research, the RFQ(Regulatory Focus Questionnaire), the chronic regulatory focus scale, developed by Higgins, Friedman, Harlow, Idson, Ayduk, and Taylor(2001), was well interpreted in Korean and validated. In study 1-a(N=208) and 1-b(N=225), corresponding factor structure was found by exploratory factor analysis. Two items, however, were judged inappropriate to Korean culture through content review, then removed. In study 2-a(N=274), confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices, and convergent and discriminant validity were proved with BIS/BAS, HEXACO, self-esteem, self-interpretation and general self-efficacy. Lastly, In study 3(repeated measured, N=120 of study 2-b), criterion related validity was confirmed by showing that RFQ predicts social desirability, self-deceptive enhancement, image management, and leisure engagement significantly. The main findings and discussions of the results were well explained.

keywords
조절초점, 향상초점, 예방초점, 만성적 조절초점, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, chronic regulatory focus

참고문헌

1.

권은아, 이종구 (2010). 여성 텔레마케터의 사고양식과 성격, 맥락수행 및 수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(4), 755-781.

2.

김교헌, 김원식 (2001). 한국판 행동활성화 및 행동억제 체계 (bas/bis) 척도. 한국심리학회지 건강, 6(2), 19-37.

3.

김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24.

4.

김민재 (2010). 초점정서와 자기해석간의 일치성 및 광고 내 맥락이 공익광고 태도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위, 이화여자대학교 대학원.

5.

김영재 (2012). 한국판 여가열의 척도 타당화 검증. 한국체육학회지-인문사회과학, 51(5), 549- 557.

6.

김정운 (2001). 관계적 정서와 문화적 정서: 정서의 문화심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 20(2), 389-407.

7.

서경현, 김정호, 유제민 (2009). 성격과 주관적 웰빙 간의 관계: Big 5 성격요인과 BAS/BIS를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지 사회문제, 15(1), 169-186.

8.

유태용, 이기범, Ashton, M. C. (2004). 한국판 Hexaco 성격검사의 구성 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 61-75.

9.

이자영, 남숙경, 이미경, 이지희, 이상민 (2009). Rosenberg의 자아존중감 척도: 문항수준 타당도분석. 한국심리학회지 상담 및 심리치료, 21(1), 173-189.

10.

최보라 (2007). 사회적 바람직성 척도 타당화. 석사학위, 이화여자대학교 대학원.

11.

한성열, 한민, 이누미야 요시유키, & 심경섭(2015). 문화심리학. pp.134.

12.

홍혜영 (1995). 완벽주의 성향, 자기효능감, 우울과의 관계연구. 석사학위, 이화여자대학교 대학원.

13.

Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: The role of prevention pride. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 435-448.

14.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.

15.

Bayliss, M. S., Gandek, B., Bungay, K. M., Sugano, D., Hsu, M. A., & Ware Jr, J. E. (1997). A questionnaire to assess the generic and disease-specific health outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Quality of Life Research, 7(1), 39-55.

16.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.

17.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(3), 388.

18.

Chernev, A. (2004). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 141-150.

19.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory: Manual, form S and form R. Psychological Assessment Resources.

20.

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.

21.

Dillon, William R. and Matthew Goldstein (1984), Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications, New York: Wiley.

22.

Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804-818.

23.

Ferris, D. L., Rosen, C. R., Johnson, R. E., Brown, D. J., Risavy, S. D., & Heller, D. (2011). Approach or avoidance (or both?): Integrating core self‐evaluations within an approach/ avoidance framework. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 137-161.

24.

Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate the challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 83-87.

25.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.

26.

Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P., & Godbey, J. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160-172.

27.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Three methods for analyzing limited time-series (N of 1) data. Behavioral Assessment.

28.

Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Optimism, promotion pride, and prevention pride as predictors of quality of life. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1521-1532.

29.

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267.

30.

Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer. Advances in experimental social psychology, 22, 93-136.

31.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

32.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 1-46.

33.

Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.

34.

Heimpel, S. A., Elliot, A. J., & Wood, J. V. (2006). Basic personality dis-positions, self-esteem, and personal goals: An approach-avoidance analysis. Journal of Personality, 74, 1293-1319.

35.

Keller J., & Bless H. (2006). Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situationally induced self-regulatory mechanisms on test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 393-405.

36.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(6), 1245.

37.

Lanaj, Chang, & Johnson. (2012). Regulatory Fcous and Work-Related Outcomes: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychological bulletin, 138(5), 998-1034.

38.

Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122-1134.

39.

Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854.

40.

Mauro, R., Sato, K., & Tucker, J. (1992). The role of appraisal in human emotions: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 301.

41.

McGregor, I., Gailliot, M. T., Vasquez, N. A., & Nash, K. A. (2007). Ideological and personal zeal reactions to threat among people with high self-esteem: Motivated promotion focus. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1587-1599.

42.

Nicklin, J. M., & Williams, K. J. (2011). Self-Regulation of Goals and Performance: Effects of Discrepancy Feedback, Regulatory Focus, and Self-Efficacy. Psychology, 2(03), 187.

43.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw.

44.

Ouschan, L., Boldero, J. M., Kashima, Y., Wakimoto, R., & Kashima, E. S. (2007). Regulatory focus strategies scale: A measure of individual differences in the endorsement of regulatory strategies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 243-257.

45.

Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598.

46.

Ping, R. A. (2005). “What is the average variance extracted for a latent variable interaction (or quadratic)?” [on-line paper]. http://home.att.net/ ~rpingjr/ave1.doc)

47.

Raykov, T. (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 329-353.

48.

Raykov, T. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated non-homogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375-385.

49.

Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(1), 36.

50.

Summerville, A., & Roese, N. J. (2008). Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 247-254.

51.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics.

52.

Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405.

53.

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism and collectivism: Past, present, and future. The handbook of culture and psychology, 35-50.

54.

Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motiva- tion: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113-135.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책