바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3
Citation Share

SAI(Self-Administered Interview) effect on the accuracy of recalling the event

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2016, v.30 no.3, pp.63-75
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.3.004


& (2016). SAI(Self-Administered Interview) effect on the accuracy of recalling the event. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30(3), 63-75, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.3.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Witnesses’ statement is one of the most important sources of information in the investigation of crimes. In order to obtain the most informative and correct statement, witnesses should be interviewed as soon as possible after the incident. However, all too often this is not achieved, largely due to demands on police resources and times. Therefore, the memory of the witness may not be perfectly preserved due to its forgetting or distortions by time delay. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to narrow down the time between the event and the actual interview. Thus, it is better to develop a tool to collect the accurate information from witnesses speedily with the less police resource. By this reason, SAI(Self-Administered Interview) has been developed and now in use. The present study is to look into SAI and to find out if it is effective on the witness to recall the event accurately. In order to explore the changes of the information quality and quantity, SAI or Standard Police Questionnaire was conducted to 235 university freshmen in Kangwon province right after watching a violent video clip and conducted again one week later. The result showed that the group who was conducted SAI maintained the accurate information even one week after the event than the group who was conducted Standard Police Questionnaire. We further discussed the practical implications of the present findings.

keywords
SAI, Cognitive Interview, Police investigation, Police Interview, Eyewitness memory, Witness statement, SAI, 인지면담, 경찰수사, 수사면담, 목격자 기억, 목격자 진술

Reference

1.

권영민 (2004). 아동의 사건 회상에서 ‘모델링’ 인지 면접의 효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

2.

김미영 (2006). 효율적인 수사면담을 위한 단축형 인지면담 개발. 경기대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

3.

김미영, 김경하, 전우병, 김시업 (2004). 인지면담기법이 아동과 성인의 사건회상 정확성에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지:사회및성격, 18(2), 137-151.

4.

김시업, 문옥영 (2010). 단축형 인지면담이 노인목격자의 회상에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지:사회및성격, 24(4), 95-112.

5.

Aldridge, N. C. (1999). Enhancing children’s memory through cognitive interviewing: An assessment technique for social work practice. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 16(2), 101-126.

6.

Ayers, M. S., & Peder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1-21.

7.

Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, R. E. Morris & R. N. Skyes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues: Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 396-401. New York: Wiley.

8.

Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514-527.

9.

Clarke, R., Dando, C., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L., (June, 2011). Toward assisting older witnesses and victims to give best evidence. Paper accepted for the International Investigative Interviewing Research Group(IIIRG), Dundee, Scotland.

10.

Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745-762.

11.

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

12.

Fisher, R. P. (1996). Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 197.

13.

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298.

14.

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (July, 2008). Preserving memory accuracy over a delay with the use of a self-administered interview. Paper presented at the European Association of Psychology and Law, Maastricht, Netherlands.

15.

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (March, 2010). In the field: Trials of self-administered interview recall tool with witnesses to serious crime. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Psychology and Law Society, Vancouver, Canada.

16.

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading postevent information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568-575.

17.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory : An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-80.

18.

Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (July, 2009). The Self-Administered Interview(SAI): Capturing eyewitness accounts at the scene of an incident. Society of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Kyoto, Japan.

19.

Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: capturing witness memory using the self administered interview. Legal and criminological psycholgy, 16(2). 211-226.

20.

Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., & Galluccio, L. (1999). Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review. Memory & Cognition, 27, 478-493.

21.

McDaniel, M. A., Kowitz, M. D., & Dunay, P. K. (1989). Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing. Memory & Cognition, 17, 423-434.

22.

Memon, Meissner, Christian, Fraser, Joanne(2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol 16(4), 340-372.

23.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing-psychology and practice. John Wiley & Sons, LTD.

24.

Paterson, H. M., Eijkemans, H., & Kemp, R. L. (2015). Investigating the Impact of Delayed Administration on the Efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 307-317.

25.

Pickel, K. L. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory(Hove, England), 12, 14-26.

26.

Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14), (pp. 207-262). New York: Academic Press.

27.

Roediger, H. L. III, & Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213-242.

28.

Roos of Hjelmsäter, E., Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The Self-Administered Interview: a means of improving childres eyewitness performance?. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(10), 897-911.

29.

Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 743-760.

30.

Shaw, J. S., III. Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness- memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 249-253.

31.

Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260-271.

32.

Tversky, B., & Marsh, E. (2000). Biased retallings of events yield biased memories. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 1-38.

33.

Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.

34.

Wilkinson, A. C., & Koestler, R. (1984). Generality of a strength model for three conditions of repeated recall. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 43-72.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy