바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Synergistic Effect of Collectivistic Value Orientation and Independent Self-Representation on Group Creativity: Evidence from a Field Study

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2019, v.33 no.4, pp.1-19
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2019.33.4.001


Abstract

The present study reports data from a field experiment that tested a synergy model of collectivistic value orientation and independent self-representation on group creativity(Choi, Cho, Seo, & Bechtoldt, 2018). Participants were recruited from a university-wide learning camp on teamwork. We induced a collectivistic value orientation as part of a teamwork activity in all groups. With this, we primed either independent or interdependent self-representation in the two experimental conditions. We also included a control condition where there was no manipulation of self-representation. Using an interactive group brainstorming task, we found support for the hypothesized synergy effect in groups where participants were randomly assigned to the work unit. No significant effects were found in groups of friends. Results also suggest that the observed synergy effect is due in part to the creativity-enhancing nature of independent self-representation, rather than detrimental effects of interdependent self-representation on group creativity. We discuss implications of these findings vis-à-vis previous research on the link between individualism-collectivism and group creativity. We also discuss limitations and future directions of this research.

keywords
집단 창의성, 개인주의-집단주의, 가치지향성, 자기표상, 현장 실험, group creativity, individualism-collectivism, value orientation, self-representation, field experiment

Reference

1.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO, US: Westview Press.

2.

Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? The division 10 debate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309-313. doi:10.1037/a0025210

3.

Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). New York: Free Press.

4.

Bechtoldt, M. N., Choi, H.-S., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Individuals in mind, mates by heart:Individualistic self-construal and collective value orientation as predictors of group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 838-844. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.014

5.

Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H.-S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 622-637. doi:10.1037/a0019386

6.

Brewer, M. B. (2006). Bring culture to the table. In Y.-R. Chen (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Vol. 9. National culture and groups (pp. 353-365). Oxford, England: JAI Press. doi:10. 1016/S1534-0856(06)09014-1

7.

Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007). Where (who)are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133

8.

Brewer, M. B., & Yuki, M. (2014). Culture and group processes. In M. Yuki, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Culture and group processes (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

9.

Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071

10.

Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780. doi:10.2307/2393615

11.

Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Meindl, J. R. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 285-304. doi:10.2307/259375

12.

Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., & Tsai, J. L. (2010). Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity:The role of culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 507-519. doi:10.1037/a0018534

13.

Choi, H.-S., Cho, S.-J., Seo, J.-G., & Bechtoldt, M. N. (2018). The joint impact of collectivistic value orientation and independent selfrepresentation on group creativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 37-56. doi:10.1177/1368430216638539

14.

Choi, H.-S., Seo, J.-G., Hyun, J., & Bechtoldt, M. N. (2019). Collectivistic independence promotes group creativity by reducing idea fixation. Small Group Research, 50, 381-407. doi:10.1177/1046496419827990

15.

Choi, H.-S., & Yoon, Y.-J. (2018). Collectivistic values and an independent mindset jointly promote group creativity: Further evidence for a synergy model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22, 236-248. doi:10.1037/gdn0000093

16.

Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142-179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752

17.

Dierdorff, E. C., Bell, S. T., & Belohlav, J. A. (2011). The power of “we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 247-262. doi:10.1037/a0020929

18.

Drach-Zahavy, A. (2004). Exploring team support:The role of team’s design, values, and leader’s support. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 235-252. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.235

19.

Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277-288. doi:10.1177/001872089203400303

20.

Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348. doi:10.2307/256525

21.

Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism:100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265-304. doi:10.1177/014920639802400302

22.

Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<275::AID-JOB796>3.0.CO;2-C

23.

Edmondson, A. C., & Mogelof, J. P. (2006). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality. In L. L. Thompson, & H.-S. Choi, (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410615732

24.

Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 652-663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.652

25.

Fischer, R., Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E., Redford, P., Harb, C., Glazer, S., & ... Achoui, M. (2009). Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms:Development of a subjective norm approach to culture measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 187-213. doi:10.1177/0022022109332738

26.

Frey, L. R. (1994). The naturalistic paradigm:Studying small groups in the postmodern era. Small Group Research, 25, 551-577. doi:10.1177/1046496494254008

27.

Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships:Selfconstrual priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162

28.

Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. (2012). Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.004

29.

Goncalo, J. A., Katz, H., & Ellis, L. M. (2019). PIECE together: How social norms support the process of team creativity. In P. B. Paulus, &B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation (pp. 215-230). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.13

30.

Goncalo, J. A., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Distributive justice beliefs and group idea generation: Does a belief in equity facilitate productivity?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 836-840. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.007

31.

Goncalo, J. A., & Krause, V. (2010). Being different or being better?: Disentangling the effects of independence and competition on group creativity. In S. R. Thye, & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 27, pp. 129-158). Wagon Lane, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/s0882-6145(2010)0000027008

32.

Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003

33.

Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2012). Understanding the individualism-collectivism cleavage and its effects: Lessons from cultural psychology. In M., Aoki, T., Kuran, & G. Roland (Eds.), Institutions and Comparative Economic Development. International Economic Association Series (pp. 213-236). Palgrave Macmillan, London. doi:10.1057/9781137034014_12

34.

Hannover, B., Pöhlmann, C., Springer, A., & Roeder, U. (2005). Implications of independent versus interdependent self-knowledge for motivated social cognition: The semantic procedural interface model of the self. Self and Identity, 4, 159-175. doi:10.1080/13576500444000245

35.

Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 822-832. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.004

36.

Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 324-343. doi:doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0224

37.

Harvey, S., & Kou, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks the role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 346-386. doi:10.1177/0001839213498591

38.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

39.

Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & BenetMartínez, V. (2000). Multicultural Minds:A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709

40.

Hornsey, M. J., Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2006). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 57-68. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.006

41.

Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978

42.

Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403-422. doi:10.1177/0022022105275959

43.

Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706. doi:10.1037/0022-3514. 65.4.681

44.

Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 359-371. doi:10.1002/acp.1699

45.

Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties:The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Network and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 216-239). Boston, US: Harvard Business School Press.

46.

Kühnen, U., Hannover, B., & Schubert, B. (2001). The semantic-procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for contextdependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 397-409. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.397

47.

Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general:Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499. doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00011-2

48.

Lee, H., & Choi, H.-S. (2019). Independent self-concept promotes group creativity in East Asia only when the group norm supports collectivism. Manuscript submitted for publication.

49.

Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868-896. doi:10.1086/218177

50.

Li, C., Kwan, L. Y., Liou, S., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2014). Culture, group processes, and creativity. In M. Yuki & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Culture and group processes (pp. 143-165). New York, NY, US:Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199985463.003.0007

51.

Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1-43. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42001-8

52.

Maio, G. R., Hahn, U., Frost, J. M., & Cheung, W. Y. (2009). Applying the value of equality unequally: Effects of value instantiations that vary in typicality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 598-614. doi:10.1037/a0016683

53.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

54.

Markus, H. R., & Hamedani, M. G. (2007). Sociocultural psychology: The dynamic interdependence among self-systems and social systems. In S. Kitayama, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 3-46). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

55.

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

56.

Miller, A. L. (2007). Creativity and cognitive style:The relationship between field-dependenceindependence, expected evaluation, and creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 243-246. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.4.243

57.

Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C.-Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015. 03.001

58.

Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance:An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210

59.

Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 175-210. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60308-1

60.

Nijstad, B. A. (2015). Creativity in groups. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2. Group processes (pp. 35-65). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. dio:10.1037/14342-002

61.

Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1

62.

Ng, A. K. (2003). A cultural model of creative and conforming behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 223-233. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj152&3_12

63.

Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. Oxford, England: Scribner'S.

64.

Owe, E., Vignoles, V. L., Becker, M., Brown, R., Smith, P. B., Lee, S. S., . . . Jalal, B. (2013). Contextualism as an important facet of individualism-collectivism: Personhood beliefs across 37 national groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 24-45. doi:10.1177/0022022111430255

65.

Oyserman, D. (1993). The lens of personhood:Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993-1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.993

66.

Oyserman, D. (2011). Culture as situated cognition:Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 164-214. doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.627187

67.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism:Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128. 1.3

68.

Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311

69.

Paulus, B. P. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity:The creative potential of idea‐generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49, 237-262. doi:10. 1111/1464-0597.00013

70.

Paulus, B. P., & Nijstad, B. A. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.001.0001

71.

Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2009). What are we talking about, when we talk about creativity? Group creativity as a multifaceted, multistage phenomenon. In J. Goncalo, E. Mannix, & M. Neale, (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Creativity in groups, (Vol. 12, pp. 1-28). Wagon Lane, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

72.

Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47-68. doi:10.1348/000712609x414204

73.

Runco, M. A. (2006). Creativity: Theories and themes:Research, development, and practice. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.

74.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x

75.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Luke, M. A., O’Mara, E. M., & Gebauer, J. E. (2013). A three-tier hierarchy of self-potency: Individual self, relational self, collective self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 235-295. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407188-9.00005-3

76.

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., . . . Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68-85. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68

77.

Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 15-31). New York, NY:Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0002

78.

Stollberger, J., West, M., & Sacramento, C. (2019). Innovation in Work Teams. In P. B. Paulus, &B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation (pp. 231-251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.14

79.

Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010). Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 157-203. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601 (10)43004-x

80.

Suttles, G. D. (2017). Friendship as a social institution. In M. McCall (Ed.), Friendship as a Social Institution (pp. 95-135). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203791493-4

81.

Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330. doi:10.2307/3069349

82.

Torelli, C. J. (2006). Individuality or conformity? The effect of independent and interdependent self-concepts on public judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 240-248. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_6

83.

Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649

84.

Thompson, L. L., & Choi, H.-S. (2006). Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

85.

Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 285-342. doi:10.1080/026999498377818

86.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

87.

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514.54.2.323

88.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). A theory of individualism and collectivism. In P. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 498-520). Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446249222. n51

89.

Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group &Organization Studies, 2, 419-427. doi:10.1177/ 105960117700200404

90.

Wagner, J. A. (2002). Utilitarian and ontological variation in individualism-collectivism. In B. M. Staw, R. M. Kramer, B. M. Staw, & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior:An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Vol. 24 (pp. 301-345). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24009-5

91.

Wagner, J. A., Humphrey, S. E., Meyer, C. J., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2012). Individualismcollectivism and team member performance:Another look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 946-963. doi:10.1002/job.783

92.

Wiekens, C. J., & Stapel, D. A. (2008). I versus we:The effects of self-construal level on diversity. Social Cognition, 26, 368-377. doi:10.1521/soco. 2008.26.3.368

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology