공감능력과 관련된 성격특성 및 성차
A study on the relationship of empathy, personality trait and sexual differences
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
본 연구는 공감능력과 관련하여 권위주의, 이타주의, 유머, 승화, 억제, 부정, 외향성, 신경증적경향성, 충동성, 자극추구, 위험회피, 사회적 민감성, 자율감, 연대감 및 자기초월의 성격변인간의 관련성을 알아보았으며, 성별에 차이가 있는지 알아보았다. 성별(남, n=64, 여, n=52)에 따라 공감능력, 사회적 민감성, 연대감에서 여성이 남성보다 유의하게 높았으며, 권위주의, 이타주의, 유머, 승화, 억제, 부정, 외향성, 신경증적경향성, 충동성, 자극추구, 위험회피, 자율감에서는 차이가 없었다. 공감능력에 영향을 주는 변인은 사회적 민감성, 부정, 승화, 외향성, 위험회피, 연대감, 권위주의였다. 남성의 경우, 부정, 연대감, 위험회피, 권위주의가, 여성은 이타주의, 외향성, 부정이 각각 공감능력을 예측하는 유의한 변인으로 나타나, 성별에 따라 공감에 영향을 미치는 성격 요인에서 차이가 나타났다.
- keywords
- 공감, 성격특성, 성차, empathy, personality trait, sexual differences
Abstract
The purpose of this study were to investigate relationship of the empathy and personality traits - authoritarianism, altruism, humor, sublimation, suppression, denial, extraversion, neuroticism, impulsiveness, novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, self directedness, cooperativeness, and self transcendent - and to examine the sexual differences. Male 64, female 52 were participated. Empathy, reward dependence, cooperativeness were significantly differed by sex. But authoritarianism, altruism, humor, sublimation, suppression, denial, extraversion, neuroticism, impulsiveness, novelty seeking, harm avoidance, and self directedness were not differed by sex. In regression analysis, reward dependence, denial, sublimation, extraversion, harm avoidance, cooperativeness, authoritarianism had significant effected to empathy. In male, denial, cooperativeness, harm avoidance, authoritarianism and in female, altruism, extraversion, denial are predictable variables of empathy. Finally, the discussion and limitation of this study and suggestion for future study were included.
- keywords
- 공감, 성격특성, 성차, empathy, personality trait, sexual differences
참고문헌
강원섭, 김용희, 장환일 (2006). 한국판 의사 공감척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 검사. 정신병리학, 15, 1,2, 11-18.
김인수, 김용희, 장환일 (2004). 한국판 의과대학생 공감척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구. 정신병리학, 13, 1,2, 9-15.
고영인(1994). 대학생의 분노표현양식과 우울 및 공격성과의 관계. 부산대학교 박사학위논문.
김정희 (1995). 스트레스 평가와 대처의 정서적 경험에 대한 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담과 심리치료, 7, 1, 44-69.
김재은, 이근후, 김정규, 박영숙 (1991). 이화 방어기제 검사. 하나의학사, 서울.
민경환(1989). 권위주의 성격과 사회적 편견-대학생 집단을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 14, 146-168.
박광배(1993). 사랑과 일에 대한 일-가정의 상충효과: 남성들의 경우. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 7, 185-197.
손인기, 이종훈, 조인희, 남범우, 박건욱, 이광헌, 사공정규, 송창진 (2002). 의과대학생, 전공의, 전문의의 환자중심적 태도. 신경정신의학, 41, 2, 290-297.
손진욱 (2000). 자기심리학개관. 정신분석 12, 1, 232-244.
신경일 (1994). 공감의 인지적, 정서적 요소 및 표현적 요소간의 관계. 부산대학교 연구보, 29, 1-37.
아이젱크, 이현수 (1985). 성격차원검사. 서울: 중앙적성출판사.
전겸구(1997). 한국판 STAXI 척도개발. 한국심리학회지, 건강, 2, 10-21.
전겸구(1998). Korean adaptation of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-K) : The case of college students. 한국심리 학회지: 건강, 3, 18-32
Ainsworth, M.D., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Avery, J. (1985). Lawyers tell what turns some patients litigious. Medical Malpractice Review, 2, 35-37.
Best, D.L., & Williams, J.E. (1997). Cross-cultural view point. In A. E. Beall & R.J. Sternberg(Eds.), Perspectives on the psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.
Byrne, A., & Eysenck, M.W. (1991). Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 849-851.
Cloninger, C.R., Svrakic, D.M. & Przybeck, T.R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975-990.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.
Davis, H. M. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators.
Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (1987). Empathy and its development, N.Y. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Holder & Stoughton.
Eysenck, M. (2002). Simply psychology. 2nd ed. Psychology Press.
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh, T., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G. & Target, M.(1995). Attachment, the reflective self and borderline states. In Goldberg, Muir, & Kerr(eds) Attachment theory. NY. Analytic Press.
Glass, R. (1996). The patient-physician relationship. Journal of American Psychiatry, 275, 147-148.
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1990). Love and work: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.
Hojat, M. (2002). Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Medical Education, 36, 1-6.
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., & Nasca, T. et al. (2001). The Jefferson Scale of Empathy : Development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational Psychology and Measure. 20, 11-16.
Krupat, E., Rosenkranz, S., Ueager, C., Barnard, K., Putnam, S., & Inui, T. (2000). The practice of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Education Counseling, 39, 49-59.
Levinson, W. (1994). Physician-patient communica- tion: a key to malpractice prevention. Journal of American Psychiatry, 273. 1619-1620.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society, Chiacago, University of Chicago Press.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality. 40, 525-543.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London, Kagan Paul Trench.
Pines, M. & Marrone, M. (2003). Empathy and sensitive responsiveness. In Coritina & Marrone (eds) Attachment theory and the psychoanalytic process. London. Whurr Publishers.
Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. NY. Guilford Press.
Sung S. M., Kim J.H., Yang, E., Abrams, K.Y. & Lyoo, I.K. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and Character Inventory. Comparative Psychiatry, 23, 102-117.
Wilmer, H. (1968). The doctor patient relationship and the issues of pity, sympathy and empathy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 41, 243.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수