바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The application of the Korean Dementia Rating Scale(K-DRS) in the diagnosis of dementia of alzheimer type

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.3, pp.617-629
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.3.009


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy of the Korean Dementia Rating Scale(K-DRS) as a diagnostic tool for dementia alzheimer type(DAT). The participants were 20 patients with DAT and 54 health control(HC) who were sampled in Seoul. Age and education levels of DAT group were comparable to HC group. The result of K-DRS score revealed significant mean difference between DAT and HC in total score and memory, executive function, conceptualization and attention subscales. Two groups divided by cutoff scores of K-DRS manual with 35% sensitivity and 98.1% specificity. Sensitivity and specificity increased up to 85% and 98.1% respectively, when we divided two groups by a logistic regression equation. These results suggest that the K-DRS has clinical utility in the diagnosis for dementia of Alzheimer type.

keywords
K-DRS, 알츠하이머, 치매, 선별, 진단, K-DRS, dementia, alzheimer, neuropsychology, neuropsychological battery

Reference

1.

강연욱. (1999). 치매의 신경심리학적 평가. 대한신경과학회지, 17(Sup. 2), 6-9.

2.

박선희. (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사(K-DRS)의 알츠하이머성 치매의 진단적 변별력 연구: 성신여자대학교 석사학위 청구논문.

3.

최성혜, 이애영, 김상윤(2002). 증례를 통한 알쯔하이머병의 이해. 대한의사협회지, 45(4), 368-377.

4.

최승원, 박은혜, 허지원, 안귀여루, 정선용, 황의완, 안창일, 김현택(2005). 알츠하이머형 치매 진단도구로써 한국판 캘리포니아 언어학습검사(K-CVLT)의 효용성 연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(4), 853-867.

5.

최진영, 나덕렬, 박선희, 박은희. (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사의 타당도와 신뢰도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 17(1), 247-258.

6.

최진영. (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사: Korean Dementia Rating Scale. 서울: 학지사.

7.

탁진국 (1996). 심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해. 서울: 한국가이던스

8.

Albert, M. S. (1996). Cognitive and neurobiologic markers of early Alzheimer disease. Proceedings of the Natlonal Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 93(24), 13547-13551.

9.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

10.

Bowler, J. V., Eliasziw, M., Steenhuis, R., Munoz, D. G., Fry, R., Merskey, H., & Hachinski, V. C. (1997). Comparative evolution of Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and mixed dementia. Archives of Neurology, 54(6), 697-703.

11.

Cummings, J. L., & Benson, D. F. (1992). Dementia: A clinical approach. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

12.

Fabrigoule, C., Rouch, I., Taberly, A., Letenneur, L., Commenges, D., Mazaux, J. M., Orgogozo, J. M., Dartigues, J. F. (1998). Cognitive process in preclinical phase of dementia. Brain, 121(Pt 1), 135-141.

13.

Fox, L. S., Olin, J. T., Erblich, J., Ippen, C. G., & Schneider, L. S. (1998). Severity of cognitiveimpairment in Alzheimer's disease affects list learning using the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13(8), 544-549.

14.

Hodges, J. R. Erzinclioglu, S., & Patterson, K. (2006). Evolution of cognitive deficits and conversion to dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a very-long-term follow-up study. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 21(5-6), 380-391.

15.

Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (1995). Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer's disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia, 33, 441-459.

16.

Jacobs, D. M., Sano, M., Dooneief, G., Marder, K., Bell, K. L., & Stern, Y. (1995). Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 45(5), 957-962.

17.

Kaszniak, A. W. (1986). The neuropsychology of dementia. In I. Grant & K. M. Adams (Eds.). Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

.Jobsta K. A., Barnetson, L. P., & Shepstone, B. J. (1997). Accurate Prediction of Histologically Confirmed Alzheimer's Disease and the Differential Diagnosis of Dementia: The Use of NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-III-R Criteria, SPECT, X-Ray CT, and Apo E4 in Medial Temporal Lobe Dementias. International Psychogeriatrics, 9, 191-222.

19.

Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment(3rd ed.). New York: Oxpord University Press.

20.

Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale (DRS): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

21.

McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman,R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology, 34(7), 939-944.

22.

Monsch, A. U., Bondi, M. W., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., Thal, L. J., Hansen, L. A., Wiederholt, W. C., Cahn, D, A., & Klauber, M. R. (1995). Clinical validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in detecting Dementia of the Alzheimer type. A double cross-validation and application to a community-dwelling sample. Archives of Neurology, 52(9), 899-904.

23.

Nelson, A., Fogel, B. S., & Faust, D. (1986). Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(2), 73-83.

24.

Tranel, D., Anderson, S. W., & Benton. (1994). Development of the concept of executive function and its relationship to the frontal lobes. In F. Boller & J. Grafman(Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 9(pp. 125-148). New York: Elsevier.

25.

Vitaliano, P. P., Breen, A. R., Albert, M. S., Russo, J., & Prinz, P. N. (1984). Memory, attention, and functional status in community-residing Alzheimer type dementia patients and optimally healthy aged individuals. Jorunal of Gerontology, 39(1), 58-64.

26.

Vitaliano, P. P., Breen, A. R., Russo, J., Albert, M., Vitiello, M. V., & Prinz, P. N. (1984). The clinical utility of the dementia rating scale for assessing Alzheimer patients. Journal of Chronic Disease, 37(9-10), 743-753.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology