녹시율의 정서증진효과에 대한 맥락 분석: 집과 집 이외의 장소
The Context Analysis of the Emotion-Improving Effects of the Index of Greenness: Home and Other Places
초록
본 연구에서는 녹시율(綠視率, Index of Greenness)의 정서증진효과에 대한 회복환경 모델(이승훈, 2007a)을 “집" 혹은 “집 이외의 장소"라는 맥락에 따라 검증해 보고자 하였다. 대학생 참여자들(301명)은 하루 동안 12회에 걸쳐 휴대전화 문자메시지를 전송 받았다. 문자메시지를 받자마자 참여자들은 “지금 이 순간"을 기준으로 자신이 있는 곳의 사진을 한 장 촬영하였고, 자신이 있는 곳이 “집"인지 혹은 “집 이외의 장소"인지를 표시하였으며, 이어서 스트레스 척도, 회복환경지각척도, 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도를 평정하였다. 일련의 데이터 처리 과정을 거쳐, 표본 1(n = 233; 집 혹은 집 이외의 장소에서 식물의 잎을 본 경우의 데이터들을 모두 포함시킨 표본), 표본 2(n = 54; 집에서 식물의 잎을 본 경우의 데이터들만 포함시킨 표본), 표본 3(n = 219; 집 이외의 장소에서 식물의 잎을 본 경우의 데이터들만 포함시킨 표본)을 만들었다. 회복환경 모델을 표본 1, 2, 3을 대상으로 검증하고 비교해 보았다. 경로분석 결과 (1) 적합도 지수는 표본 3에서 가장 높았고, (2) ‘녹시율 → 회복환경' 경로는 표본 3에서만 유의하였으며, (3) ‘회복환경 → 정서' 경로는 세 표본 모두 유의하였다. 위계적 회귀분석을 한 결과 표본 2에서만 스트레스 × 회복환경 상호작용이 유의하게 나타났다. 즉, 정서에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 스트레스의 효과가 회복환경 지각이 높을 때에만 두드러지게 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 녹시율이 낮음에도 불구하고 집이 심리적 회복의 중요한 세팅 역할을 하고 있으며, 이로 인해 정서를 증진시킴을 보여준다. 이와는 대조적으로, 본 연구는 집 이외의 장소에서는 녹시율이 높을수록 심리적 에너지가 잘 회복되며, 이로 인해 정서가 증진됨을 보여준다.
- keywords
- Index of Greenness (IG), restorative environment, emotion, context, home, 녹시율, 회복환경, 정서, 맥락, 집, Index of Greenness (IG), restorative environment, emotion, context, home
Abstract
This study is to test the restorative environment model (Lee, 2007a) of the emotion-improving effects of the Index of Greenness (IG) according to the context of “home" or “places other than home." During a day, cellular phone text messages were sent to South Korean undergraduates (n = 301) twelve times. On receiving each message, participants took a photograph of their surroundings, marked if they were either “at home" or “in places other than home", and then rated stress scale, the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with reference to “here and now." Three samples were drawn through a series of data processing. These samples consisted of the data only in case that the participants saw the leaves of plants (1) at home or in places other than home (sample 1; n = 233); (2) at home (sample 2; n = 54); and (3) in places other than home (sample 3; n = 219). The restorative environment model was tested with sample 1, 2, and 3, and then compared. A series of path analyses showed that: (1) the fit indices were better for the data from the sample 3 than the sample 1 and 2; (2) the causal path from ‘IG' to ‘restorative environment' was statistically significant only in sample 3; and (3) the causal paths from ‘restorative environment' to ‘emotion' were statistically significant in all three samples. Hierarchical multiple regressions showed that stress × restorative environment interaction was statistically significant only in sample 2. In other words, the negative effect of stress on emotion was present only at high level of restorative environment. These results indicate that in spite of the low level of IG, home is an important setting for psychological restoration, which enhances emotion. In contrast, these results indicate that in places other than home, higher IG is associated with higher psychological restoration, which enhances emotion.
- keywords
- Index of Greenness (IG), restorative environment, emotion, context, home, 녹시율, 회복환경, 정서, 맥락, 집, Index of Greenness (IG), restorative environment, emotion, context, home
참고문헌
목정훈 (2005). 서울의 도시경관에 대한 시민인식과 정책적 시사점. 서울연구포커스, 32, 1-9.
생태도시센터 (n.d.). 생태도시란? http://ecocity.or.kr/ channel_01/index.html 에서 2006, 4, 27 인출.
서울그린트러스트 (n.d.). 서울의 녹지현실. http:// sgt.or.kr/data/data-1.html 에서 2004, 11, 22 인출.
서울시 푸른도시국 (n.d.). 일반현황. http:// www.seoul.go.kr/info/organ/subhomepage/ green/data/general/1219831_12684.html 에서 2006, 4, 27 인출.
이승훈 (2007a). 녹시율(綠視率)의 정서증진효과에 대한 모델 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(1), 189-217.
이승훈 (2007b). 회복환경 모델에 근거한 녹시율(綠視率) 설정이 정서 증진에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(2), 439-465.
이승훈, 현명호 (2003a). 한국판 회복환경지각척도의 요인구조. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 229-241.
이승훈, 현명호 (2003b). 회복환경의 스트레스 완화효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 525-545.
이승훈, 현명호 (2004). 자연환경과 회복환경의 스트레스 완화효과 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(3), 609-632.
이유정 (1994). 성격특질이 기분의 수준 및 변화성에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문.
조용현 (2003). 서울시 가로 녹시율 증진방안. 서울시정개발연구원 기본연구보고서 (시정연 2003-R- 10).
조용현 (2004, 8, 1a). 가로에서 시민의 눈으로 직접 느낄 수 있는 식물의 양인 '녹시율'을 22%까지 높여야. http://www.sdi.re.kr/ 에서 2004, 11, 21 인출.
조용현 (2004, 8, 1b). 일본의 가로 녹시율 증진 시책. http://www.sdi.re.kr/ 에서 2004, 11, 21 인출.
Bowler, P. A., Kaiser, F. G., & Hartig, T. (1999). A role for ecological restoration work in university environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 19-26.
Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1989). Effect of changes in streamflow on scenic quality: The case of the Cache La Poudre River. Final Report A. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1991). Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: Relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river. Water Resources Research, 27, 1787-1795.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-138.
Cimprich, B. E. (1990). Attentional fatigue and restoration in individuals with cancer. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan. USA.
Cimprich, B. E. (1992). A theoretical perspective on attention and patient education. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(3), 39-51.
Cimprich, B. E. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16(2), 83-92.
Cimprich, B. E. (1998). Age and extent of surgery affect attention in women treated for breast cancer. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(3), 229-238.
Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 1-29). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 82-108.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 몰입의 즐거움 [Finding flow]. (이희재 역). 서울: 해냄 출판사. (원전은 1997에 출판)
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 175(9), 526-536.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40) (pp. 57-97). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Despres, C. (1991). The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. Journal of Architectural & Planning Research, 8(2), 96-115.
Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475-500.
Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape & Urban Planning, 25, 17-36.
Hartig, T., & Evans, G. W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experiences. In T. Garling & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches (pp. 427-457). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123.
Hartig, T., Johansson, G., & Kylin, C. (2003). Residence in the social ecology of stress and restoration. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 611-636.
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness (Working Paper No. 5). Gavle, Sweden: Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala University.
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 590-607.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G., & Garling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14, 175-194.
Hartig, T., & Lawrence, R. J. (2003). Introduction: The residential context of health. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 455-473.
Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment & Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
Hartig, T., Nyberg, L., Nilsson, L., & Garling, T. (1999). Testing for mood congruent recall with environmentally induced mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 353-367.
Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2003). Guest editors' introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 103-107.
Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 165-170.
Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159-170.
Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 101-114.
Jansen, D. A. (1997). Attentional demands and restorative activities: Do they influence directed attention among the elderly? Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison. USA.
Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 127-161). New York: Plenum.
Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 193-201.
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 507-542.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (2001). 인간중심적 자연환경의 설계 [With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature]. (김봉원과 김유일 역). 서울: 태림문화사. (원전은 1998에 출판)
Kaplan, S. (1993). The role of natural environment aesthetics in the restorative experience. In P. H. Gobster (Ed.), Managing urban and high-use recreation settings. St. Paul, MN: Forest Service, USDA. General Technical Report NC-163, pp. 46-49.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., & Slakter, D. B. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment & Behavior, 25(6), 725-742.
Kaplan, S., & Peterson, C. (1993). Health and environment: A psychological analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 17-23.
Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment (Vol. 6) (pp. 163-203). New York, NY: Plenum.
Korpela, K. M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2001). Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 572-589.
Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44.
Lawrence, R. J. (2002). Healthy residential environments. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 394-412). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Lepore, S. J., & Evans, G. W. (1996). Coping with multiple stressors in the environment. In M. Zeidner & S. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 350-377). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Palmer, J. F., & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161.
Parsons, R., & Hartig, T. (2000). Environmental psychophysiology. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd Ed.) (pp. 815-846). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
Scott, M. J., & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(4), 263-281.
Sixsmith, J. (1986). The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(4), 281-298.
Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 147-157.
Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 54-77.
Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. E. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85.
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 655-690). New York: Wiley.
Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135-146.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness" on children's cognitive functioning. Environment & Behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수