바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.19 No.2

Citation Share

A Study on the Development and Validation of Korean Ambivalent Sexism Inventory

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2005, v.19 no.2, pp.39-66



& (2005). A Study on the Development and Validation of Korean Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 19(2), 39-66.

Abstract

Five studies were performed to develop and validate the Korean Ambivalent Sexism Inventory(K-ASI). Total 3491 high school students, college students and adults participated in these five studies. Through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, 36 items(18 Hostile and 18 Benevolent Sexism) were selected and finally included in K-ASI. The K-ASI taps 2 positively correlated component of sexism that nevertheless represent opposite evaluative orientations toward women：Hostile Sexism(HS) and Benevolent Sexism(BS). HS and BS are hypothesized to encompass 3 sources of male ambivalence：Paternalism, Gender Differentiation, and Heterosexuality. These five studies also established convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of K-ASI. That is, HS-BS correlations were moderate, and the correlations between HS scores(controlling for the BS scores) with scores from various other sexism scales were moderate while the correlation between BS scores with scores obtained from these existing scales when controlling for the HS scores were nonsignificantly low, as expected. The HS scale correlates with negative attitudes toward and stereotypes about women, and the BS scale correlates with positive attitudes toward and stereotypes about women. The results of a nation-wide survey(Study 5) demonstrated that males as compared to females, adults than younger students and people in Youngnam area than in other regions showed higher HS and BS scores. The theoretical and the practical implications of these two types of sexism and the use of the scale were discussed.

keywords
양가적 성차별주의, 적대적 성차별주의, 온정적 성차별주의, 성 편견, 고정관념, 타당도, 여성, ambivalent sexism, hostile sexism(HS), benevolent sexism(BS), K-ASI, women, prejudice

Reference

1.

김양희, (2000) ^한국형 남녀평등의식검사개발 사회 및 성격,

2.

김혜숙, 적대적 및 온정적 성차별주의가 여성 하위 집단에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향 사회 및 성격,

3.

이석재, (1999) 강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증,

4.

Abrams, D.,, (2003) Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance and stranger rape The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

5.

Begany, J. J., , (2002) Psychological predictors of sexual harassment,

6.

Berscheid, (1983) The emerging science of relationships,

7.

Bohner, (1996) The threat of rape Its psychological impact on non-victimized women, Oxford University Press

8.

Burt,M.R, (1980) Cultural myths and supports of rape,

9.

Campbell, B, (1997) Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism Psychology of Women Quarterly,

10.

Eagly,A.H.,, (1989) Gender stereotypes attitudes toward women and men,

11.

A, (1993) Are people preju- dices against women? Some answers from research on attitudes and judgments of competence European Review of Social Psychology,

12.

Fiske, (1999) Status and inter- dependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth Journal of Social Issues,

13.

Glick, (1996) Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology,

14.

Glick, (2001) hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications,

15.

Glick, (2000) Beyond prejudice as a simple antipathy Hostile and benev- olent sexism across cultures Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

16.

Jackman, (1994) Paternalism and conflict in gender University of California Press,

17.

Jost,J.T.,, (1994) The role of stereo- typing in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness,

18.

Katz, (1988) Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

19.

Psychology Men, (2003) Explaining heterosexual men's attitudes toward women and gay men The theory of exclusively masculine identity,

20.

Kilianski, S., , (1998) Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles,

21.

MacDonald, (1998) Cross- dimension ambivalence toward social groups Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,

22.

Masser, (1999) The relationships among hostility Psychology of Women Quarterly,

23.

(1972) The Attitudes Toward Women Scale JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,

24.

Swim, (1995) Sexism and racism：Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. ,

25.

Tougas, (1995) Neo-sexsm：Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil.,

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy