바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.19 No.3

Citation Share

반복질문이 허위자백에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Repeated Questions on False Confession

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2005, v.19 no.3, pp.23-36
백승경 (중앙경찰학교)
김재휘 (중앙대학교)
백승경, & 김재휘. (2005). 반복질문이 허위자백에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(3), 23-36.

초록

본 연구는 암시적 질문 유형 중 하나인 반복질문의 허위 자백 유도 가능성을 알아보고자 수행되었다. 연구의 목적을 위하여 허위의 인지실험을 실시하였으며, 조작된 실험의 내용은 참여자들이 컴퓨터를 사용하는 도중 컴퓨터 오류를 경험하는 것이었다. 컴퓨터 오류는 사전 조작된 것으로 참여자들과는 무관한 것이었다. 오류가 발생한 후, 참여자들은 그들이 컴퓨터 오류를 발생시켰을 가능성에 대한 질문을 받았고, 반복처치는 참여자들의 응답 후 동일질문을 총 3회 하는 것으로 조작하였다. 반복질문에 대한 참여자들의 진술은 전부 녹음, 기록하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 질문이 반복될수록 컴퓨터 오류에 대한 자기의 잘못을 시인하는 참여자들의 반응성이 증가하였고, 1회 반복 질문에 비해 3회 반복 질문에서 잘못을 시인하는 빈도가 6배 이상 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 반복질문의 허위자백 유도 가능성을 입증한 것으로서, 추후 연구에서는 반복질문을 포함한 여러 가지 암시적 질문유형에 따른 효과를 비교, 분석할 것과 개인의 심리적 특성에 따른 암시적 자극의 효과를 살펴볼 것을 제언한다.

keywords
암시적 질문, 반복질문, 암시성, 신문, 허위자백, Suggestive questions, Repeated questions, Suggestibility, Interrogation, False confession.

Abstract

This research is to study whether innocent participants make false confession on their uncommitted behavior due to the repeated question, which is one of the suggestive questioning methods.For this purpose, the participants went through the false cognition experiment by the computer simulation, and they were manipulated to experience computer errors while they were under the test. After the computer errors occurred, the participants were repeatedly asked four times regarding the possibility of making computer errors of their own. Three-time repetition process was conducted and the response of each participant was tape recorded and analyzed carefully. The experiment showed that the participants' tendency toward admitting their faults on the computer errors was increased as they received more repeated questions. The effect of the repeated question was significantly increased at the third repeated question­The frequency of participants admitting their faults at the third repeated question was over six times higher than that of at the first repeated question. This proved that the repeated question has an influence over the suggestibility of false confession. This results suggest that future study should compare and analyze the effectiveness for various suggestive questioning types including the repeated question and individual trait.

keywords
암시적 질문, 반복질문, 암시성, 신문, 허위자백, Suggestive questions, Repeated questions, Suggestibility, Interrogation, False confession.

참고문헌

1.

김병준, (2003) 허위자백의 심리 -K순경 사건을 중심으로-,

2.

김종열, (1995) 범죄자들의 범행 자백 이유에 관한 연구, 국립과학수사연구소

3.

박광배, (2002) 목격자와 증인진술의 정확성,

4.

이수정, (2003) 허위증언의 기제와 방지대책,

5.

최상진, (2000) 한국인의 사회심리, 중앙대학교 출판부

6.

함근수, (1995) 남녀 범죄자의 성격특성과 범죄행동 및 자백간의 관계,

7.

浜田 壽美男, (2003) 자백의 연구-取調해야할 사람 과 取調를 받아야할 사람의 心的 構圖,

8.

Baxter, (2000) the importance of being earnest,

9.

Baxter, (2003) interaction between interviewees' self-esteem and interviewer style,

10.

Bruck, M, (1997) External and internal sources of variation in the creation of false reports in children,

11.

& Bruck, (1993) Suggestibility of the child witness,

12.

(1993) Interrogative suggestibility in children and its relationship with memory and vocabulary,

13.

Endres, J, (1997) The suggestibility of the child witness The role of individual Differences and their assess- ment The journal of redibility Assessment and Witness Psychology,

14.

memory recall, (1983) British Journal of Psychiatry,

15.

Medicine, (1991) Suggestibility and compliance among alleged false confessors and resisters in criminal trials,

16.

Wiley, (1992) The Psychology of Interroga- tions,

17.

Gudjonsson,G.H, (2003a) Psychology brings justice：the science of forensic psychology,

18.

A Handbook, (2003b) The Psychology of Interroga- tions and Confessions,

19.

Gudjonsson,G.H.,, (1986) Suggestibility in police interrogation：a social psychological model,

20.

(1985) Interrogative suggestibility and its relationship with personality,

21.

Kassin,S.M, (1997) The psychology of confession evidence,

22.

Kassin, (1996) The psychology of false confession,

23.

Kassin,S.M.,, (1991) Police interrogations and confessions,

24.

Kassin, (1997) On the power of confession evidence An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis,

25.

Kassin, (1997) An experimental test of the,

26.

Kassin, (1985) The psychology of evidence and trial procedures,

27.

& Zaragoza, (1985) Misleading postevent information and memory for event Arguments and evidence against memory impairment,

28.

Human Learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology,

29.

Moston,S, (1987) The suggestibility of children in interview studies,

30.

Poole,D.A.,, (1991) Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults,

31.

Potter,J.W.,, (1999) Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis,

32.

Qusi,J.A.,, (2002) Children's memories of experienced and nonexperienced events following repeated interview,

33.

Register,P.A.,, (1988) Hypnosis and interrogative suggestibility,

34.

(1996) The psychological characteristics of ‘False confessor' A study among Iceland prison inmates and juvenile offenders,

35.

Zimmermann, (1982) On the development of an instru- ment for suggestibility assessment in younger school children The suggestibility of the child witness The role of individual Differences and their a ssessment The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology,

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책