바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

한국 대학생의 연인평가와 연애태도 연구:유사성을 중심으로

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2006, v.20 no.1, pp.39-54
주현덕 (연세대학교)
장근영 (한국청소년정책연구원)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

keywords
MALPS, Love attitude scale, Satisfaction in love relationship, Love type, Lover evaluation, MALPS, 연애태도, 관계만족, 애정유형, 연애척도, 애인평가척도

참고문헌

1.

김아영, (2004) 심리검사 개발 절차 정의적 측정도구를 중심으로,

2.

김중술, (1994) 新 사랑의 의미, 서울대학교 출판부

3.

안신호, (1993) 정서의 구조 한국어 정서단어 분석,

4.

안신호, (1994) 한국어 정서단어 분석 정서단어의 유사성구조와 정서체험의 구조,

5.

이경성 ; 한덕웅, (2005) 친밀한 이성관계에서 이상과 현재의 차이가 관계만족에 미치는 영향,

6.

이훈구, (2002) 심리학자가 들여다 본 인간시장, 법문사

7.

정남운, (2004) 대인관계 원형모델에 따른 한국판 대인관계 형용사 척도의 구성,

8.

한덕웅, (1992) 성격특성 용어의 사용 빈도 호오도 및 사회적 바람직성,

9.

한덕웅, (2000) 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도,

10.

함인희, (2001) 배우자 선택 양식의 변화 친밀성의 혁명?,

11.

홍대식, (1996) 한국 대학생의 사랑스타일과 이성상대 선택준거,

12.

홍대식, (1998) 데이트 관계의 형성과 발전에 관련된 변인들,

13.

홍대식, (2002) 연애와 결혼의 심리학, 청암미디어

14.

Aron, A, (2000) Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship qual- ity,

15.

Aronson, E, (1999) The Social Animal(9th edit.)., Worth Publishers/W Freeman and Company

16.

Barash, D. P, (2001) The Myth of Monogamy, W. H. Freeman and Company Inc.

17.

Baumeister,R.F.,, (2002) Cultural suppression of female sexuality,

18.

Becker, D. V, (2004) When the sexes need not differ:Emotional responses to the sexual and emotional aspects of infidelity.,

19.

Berg,J.H.,, (1986) Attraction and exchange in continuing and noncontinuing relation- ships,

20.

Buss, (1994) The Evolution of Desire, Basic Books

21.

Buss, D. M, (2000) The Dangerous Passion오셀로를 닮은 남자 헤라를 닮은 여자, 청림

22.

Buss,D.M.,, (1986) Preferences in human mate selection,

23.

Byrne, (1986) Do similar attitude affect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

24.

Byrne, (1988) The Psychology of Love, Yale University Press

25.

Condon,J.W.,, (1988) Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction,

26.

(1992) Are You The One For Me? New York, Dell Publishing

27.

Diamond, J, (1997) Why is Sex Fun? The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Orion Publishing Group Inc

28.

Dion,K.L.,, (1973) Correlates of romantic love,

29.

Feingold, (1992) Gender difference in mate selecting preferences A test of the parental investment model,

30.

Feingold, (1990) Gender difference in effects of phys- ical attractiveness on romantic attraction A com- parison across five research paradigms Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

31.

Fisher,H, (2004) Why We Love, Henry Holt and Company

32.

Fisher, H. E, (1999) The First Sex:제1의 성, 생각의 나무

33.

Fisher, (1994) Anatomy of Love, Norton & Company Inc

34.

Fromm,E, (1956) The Art of Loving, Harper & Row

35.

Gable, (1993) Instrument Develop- ment in the Affective Domain, Kluwer Academic Publishers

36.

Gilbert, (1987) Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy,

37.

Greitemeyer, T. , (2005) Receptivity to sexual offer as a function of sex socioeconomic status, physical attractiveness and intimacy of the offer,

38.

Hazan,C.,, (1987) Romantic love concep- tualized as an attachment process,

39.

Hendrick, (1984) Do men and women love differently? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,

40.

Hendrick,C.,, (1986) A theory and method of love,

41.

Jones, T. J, (2004) How do I love thee? Let me count Js:Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction,

42.

Kalick,S.M, (1987) Physical attractiveness as a status que,

43.

Kirkpatrick, (1994) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

44.

Kurdek,L.A, (1993) Predicting marital dissolution:A 5 year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples,

45.

Langlois, (1994) What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science,

46.

Lee, (1988) The Psychology of Love, Yale University Press

47.

Lykken,D.T.,, (1993) Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection,

48.

Mathes, (1975) The Journal of Psychology,

49.

Miller, G, (2000) Mating Mind:How sexual choice shared the evolution of human nature?, Brockman Inc

50.

Osgood, (1957) The Measurement of Meaning University of Illinois Press,

51.

Pines,A.M, (1998) A prospective study of personality and gender differences in romantic attraction,

52.

Pines, A. M, (1999) Falling in love, Routledge

53.

Pronin, E, (2001) You don't know me, but I know you:The illusion of asymmetric insight,

54.

Robin N, (1996) Women Who Love Too Much 너무 사랑하는 여자들, 한마음사

55.

Rust, J, (1999) Modern Psychometrics:The science of psychological assessment(2nd Ed.).,

56.

Schmitt,D.P.,, (2001) Human mate poaching:Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships,

57.

Oliver, (1994) Perceived benefits and costs of romantic relation- ships for women and men Implications for exchange theory,

58.

Simpson,J.A, (1987) The dissolution of romantic relationships:factors involved in relationship sta- bility and emotional distress,

59.

Sternberg,R.J, (1987) Liking versus loving:A compar- ative evaluation of theories,

60.

Sternberg, R. J, (1998) Love is a Story, Oxford University Press

61.

Sternberg, (1988) The Psychology of Love, Yale University Press

62.

Surra, (1990) Similarity of outcomes and conflict in dating relationships Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

63.

Townsend, J, (1998) What Women Want - What Men Want, Oxford University Press

64.

Tzeng, (1993) Measurement of Love and Intimate Relations and Applications for Love Development, Praeger Publishers

65.

Waller,N.G.,, (1994) The importance of nongenetic influences on romantic love styles:A twin-family study,

66.

Wang,A.Y.,, (1995) Passionate love and anxiety:A cross generational study,

67.

(2006) 韓國心理學會誌 : 社會 및 性格,

68.

Hyun-Duk Joo, Korean College Students' Evaluation of Self and Preferred Types in Love Relationships Using MALPS, Yonsei University Korea Institute for Youth Development

69.

Me, (1986) in order to validate the inventory was administered to 217 college students and the Satisfaction in love relationship scale were administered to the same subjects MALPS consists of 6 factors each of which has 4 subscales Aimed to find out Korean college students' evaluation and attitudes in love relationships MALPS was administered about self,

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격