바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

남녀 대학생들이 거짓말시 나타내는비언어적 행동단서의 차이

Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2006, v.20 no.2, pp.57-72
김시업 (경기대학교)
전우병 (경기대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 거짓말과 관련된 정서를 표현하는 데 있어서 남녀의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 대학생 62명(남자; 30명, 여자; 32명)을 대상으로 2명씩 동성짝을 이루게 하여 한 사람은 실험참여자, 다른 한 사람은 실험협조자 역할을 하였다. 실험참여자는 주관식 중간과제 평가시험 동안 실험협조자의 주도아래 부정행위를 하였다. 그런 다음 일대일 면담과정에서 실험참여자들(남; 15명, 여; 16명)이 평가시험에 관한 질문에 답을 하는 동안 나타내는 비언어적 행동들의 빈도수를 측정하였다. 각 비언어적 행동은 언어혼란(답변지연시간, 목소리 높이, 말주저, 말실수, 잠시멈춤빈도), 얼굴동작(시선회피, 웃음, 눈깜박임, 혀내밀기), 몸동작(치장행동, 부연설명동작, 손/손가락 움직임, 발/발가락 움직임, 머리움직임, 몸움직임, 자세바꾸기)으로 총 16개였다. 각 비언어적 행동들의 평균 빈도수를 종속변인으로 하여 진술(진실·거짓말; 피험자내설계) × 성별(남․여; 피험자간설계) 반복측정 변량분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 진술에 따른 주효과는 말주저, 말실수, 웃음, 부연설명동작, 치장행동, 손/발/몸 움직임에서 나타났다. 즉 위의 비언어적 행동들이 거짓말의 탐지단서가 될 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 성별에 따른 주효과는 발견되지 않았다. 그리고 상호작용효과는 말주저에서만 유의미한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 남자는 거짓을 말할 때 말주저가 증가하는 것으로 나타났으나, 여자는 진실을 말할 때와 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 여성들이 남성들에 비해서 거짓말과 관련된 부정적 정서 표현을 더 잘 조절하고 통제할 수 있음을 보여주는 결과이다.

keywords
detection. deception. nonverbal behaviors. sex differences, 거짓말 탐지, 비언어적 행동, 성차전우병, 김시업은 경기대학교 대학원 범죄심리학과에 재직하고 있음.

Abstract

This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception. 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs, with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice. 31 subjects(male; 15, female; 16) were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually. After separating lie and truth responses to each question, the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying. There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency:paralanguage (latency period, high pitch of voice, speech hesitations, speech errors, frequency of pauses), facial characteristics (gaze aversion, smiles, blinking, use of tongues), body movements (illustrators, adaptors, hand and finger movements, leg and foot movements, head movements, trunk movements, shifting positions). The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations, smiles, illustrators, adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors, hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth. On the other hand, sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations, hand movements when they were lying.

keywords
detection. deception. nonverbal behaviors. sex differences, 거짓말 탐지, 비언어적 행동, 성차전우병, 김시업은 경기대학교 대학원 범죄심리학과에 재직하고 있음.

참고문헌

1.

김우룡, (2005) 비언어적 커뮤니케이션론, 나남출판

2.

전우병, (2005) 거짓말 탐지의 비언어적 지표탐색과 훈련효과,

3.

Akehurst,L.,, (1999) Creating suspects in police interviews,

4.

Archer, (1980) How to expand your social intelligence quotient,

5.

Argyle, (1981) The contribution of social interaction research to social skills training, Guilford Press

6.

Buck,R, (1984) The communication of emotion, Guilford Press

7.

Buck, (1974) personality and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

8.

Davis,M.,, (1995) Demeanor and credibility,

9.

DePaulo,B.M, (1992) Nonverbal behavior and self- presentation,

10.

In J, (1989) The motiva- tional impairment effect in the communication of deception,

11.

Tang, (1988) The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

12.

Lanier, (1983) Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology,

13.

Lindsay, (2003) Cues to Deception,

14.

Zuckerman, (1980) Human as lie detectors Journal of Communication,

15.

Ekman,P, (1965) Differential communication of affect bt head and body cues,

16.

Ekman, (1985) clues to deceit in the marketplace,

17.

Ekman, (1988) Journal of nonverbal Behavior,

18.

Ekman,P.,, (1969) Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception,

19.

Ekman,P.,, (1974) Detecting deception from the body or face,

20.

Ekman, (1972) Emotion in the human face, Pergamon Press

21.

Ekman, (1980) Relative impotance of face and speech in judgments of personality and affect Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

22.

Ekman, (1991) and body in detecting deceit Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

23.

Elliot,G.C, (1979) Some effects of deception and level of self-monitoring on planning and reacting to a self-presentation,

24.

Feldman, (1992) Application of nonverbal behav- ioral theories and research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

25.

Frank,M.G.,, (1997) The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high- stake lies,

26.

Friedman, (1980) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Prince Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness

27.

Friedman,H.S.,Riggio,R.E.,, (1980) Personality and the enactment of emotion,

28.

Harper, (1980) Encoding-decoding of nonverbal emotional message Sex differences in spontaneous and enacted ex- pression Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

29.

Garrido, E, (2004) Police officers; credibility judgments:accuracy and esti- mated ability,

30.

Gudjonsson, G. , (2002) The psychology of interrogations and confessions:a handbook, Wiley

31.

Hall, (1985195-225) Multichan- nel integrations of nonverbal behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

32.

Kalbfleisch, (1992) application of deception research in a troubled world Journal of Applied Communication Research,

33.

Krauss, (1976) Modalities and cues in the detection of deception Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,

34.

Kraut,R.E, (1980) Humans as lie detectors:some second thoughts,

35.

Lippa,R, (1976) Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extroversion during role- played teaching,

36.

Nelson A., , (2004) You don't say:Navi- gating nonverbal communication between the sexes, Baror International Co

37.

Phillips, (1978) The social skills basis of psycho- pathology Alternatives to abnormal psychology,

38.

Remland,M, (2000) Nonverbal communication in every life, Houghton Mifflim

39.

Riggio,R.E, (1986) Assessment of basic social skills,

40.

Riggio, (1989) Manual for the Social Skills Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press

41.

Riggio, (1992) Application of nonverbal behavioral theories and research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

42.

Riggio,R.E.,, (1983) Individual differ- ences and cues to deception,

43.

Riggio,R.E.,, (1986) Impression formation:The role of expressive behavior,

44.

Rosenthal, (1979) Sensitivity to nonverbal communication, Johns Hopkins University Press

45.

Scherer, (1979) Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions Judging affect from synthesized tone sequences, Oxford University Press

46.

Snyder,M, (1974) The self-monitoring of expressive behavior,

47.

Snyder, (1979) Advances in experimental social psychology, Aca- demic Press

48.

Snyder, (1987) The psychology of self-montoring,

49.

Sternberg,R.J.,, (1985) Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication,

50.

Trower, (1978) University of Pittsburgh Press,

51.

Vrij, A. , (1995) Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview,

52.

Vrij, A, (1998) Telling and detecting lies:some future directions in research, Forensic Update

53.

Vrij, A, (2000) Detecting lies and deceit:the psychology of lying and implications for professional practice, John Wiley & Sons.

54.

Vrij, A., & Mann, S, (2001) Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation:the case of a convicted murder.,

55.

Vrij, A, (2004) Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults,

56.

Vrij, A, (2000) Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior,

57.

Wagner, (1986) Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology,

58.

Zuckerman, (1979) Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,

59.

Zuckerman, (1981) Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press

60.

Zuckerman, (1979) Posed and spontaneous communication of emotion via facial and vocal cues Journal of Personality,

61.

Woo Byoung Jhon , Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception, Kyonggi University

62.

male, This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually After separating lie and truth responses to each question the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying,

63.

smiles, There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency high pitch of voice frequency of pauses use of tongues,

64.

smiles, The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying,

65.

smiles, The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying,

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격