바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2006, v.20 no.2, pp.57-72


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception. 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs, with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice. 31 subjects(male; 15, female; 16) were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually. After separating lie and truth responses to each question, the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying. There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency:paralanguage (latency period, high pitch of voice, speech hesitations, speech errors, frequency of pauses), facial characteristics (gaze aversion, smiles, blinking, use of tongues), body movements (illustrators, adaptors, hand and finger movements, leg and foot movements, head movements, trunk movements, shifting positions). The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations, smiles, illustrators, adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors, hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth. On the other hand, sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations, hand movements when they were lying.

keywords
detection. deception. nonverbal behaviors. sex differences, 거짓말 탐지, 비언어적 행동, 성차전우병, 김시업은 경기대학교 대학원 범죄심리학과에 재직하고 있음.

Reference

1.

김우룡, (2005) 비언어적 커뮤니케이션론, 나남출판

2.

전우병, (2005) 거짓말 탐지의 비언어적 지표탐색과 훈련효과,

3.

Akehurst,L.,, (1999) Creating suspects in police interviews,

4.

Archer, (1980) How to expand your social intelligence quotient,

5.

Argyle, (1981) The contribution of social interaction research to social skills training, Guilford Press

6.

Buck,R, (1984) The communication of emotion, Guilford Press

7.

Buck, (1974) personality and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

8.

Davis,M.,, (1995) Demeanor and credibility,

9.

DePaulo,B.M, (1992) Nonverbal behavior and self- presentation,

10.

In J, (1989) The motiva- tional impairment effect in the communication of deception,

11.

Tang, (1988) The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

12.

Lanier, (1983) Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology,

13.

Lindsay, (2003) Cues to Deception,

14.

Zuckerman, (1980) Human as lie detectors Journal of Communication,

15.

Ekman,P, (1965) Differential communication of affect bt head and body cues,

16.

Ekman, (1985) clues to deceit in the marketplace,

17.

Ekman, (1988) Journal of nonverbal Behavior,

18.

Ekman,P.,, (1969) Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception,

19.

Ekman,P.,, (1974) Detecting deception from the body or face,

20.

Ekman, (1972) Emotion in the human face, Pergamon Press

21.

Ekman, (1980) Relative impotance of face and speech in judgments of personality and affect Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

22.

Ekman, (1991) and body in detecting deceit Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

23.

Elliot,G.C, (1979) Some effects of deception and level of self-monitoring on planning and reacting to a self-presentation,

24.

Feldman, (1992) Application of nonverbal behav- ioral theories and research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

25.

Frank,M.G.,, (1997) The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high- stake lies,

26.

Friedman, (1980) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Prince Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness

27.

Friedman,H.S.,Riggio,R.E.,, (1980) Personality and the enactment of emotion,

28.

Harper, (1980) Encoding-decoding of nonverbal emotional message Sex differences in spontaneous and enacted ex- pression Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,

29.

Garrido, E, (2004) Police officers; credibility judgments:accuracy and esti- mated ability,

30.

Gudjonsson, G. , (2002) The psychology of interrogations and confessions:a handbook, Wiley

31.

Hall, (1985195-225) Multichan- nel integrations of nonverbal behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

32.

Kalbfleisch, (1992) application of deception research in a troubled world Journal of Applied Communication Research,

33.

Krauss, (1976) Modalities and cues in the detection of deception Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,

34.

Kraut,R.E, (1980) Humans as lie detectors:some second thoughts,

35.

Lippa,R, (1976) Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extroversion during role- played teaching,

36.

Nelson A., , (2004) You don't say:Navi- gating nonverbal communication between the sexes, Baror International Co

37.

Phillips, (1978) The social skills basis of psycho- pathology Alternatives to abnormal psychology,

38.

Remland,M, (2000) Nonverbal communication in every life, Houghton Mifflim

39.

Riggio,R.E, (1986) Assessment of basic social skills,

40.

Riggio, (1989) Manual for the Social Skills Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press

41.

Riggio, (1992) Application of nonverbal behavioral theories and research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

42.

Riggio,R.E.,, (1983) Individual differ- ences and cues to deception,

43.

Riggio,R.E.,, (1986) Impression formation:The role of expressive behavior,

44.

Rosenthal, (1979) Sensitivity to nonverbal communication, Johns Hopkins University Press

45.

Scherer, (1979) Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions Judging affect from synthesized tone sequences, Oxford University Press

46.

Snyder,M, (1974) The self-monitoring of expressive behavior,

47.

Snyder, (1979) Advances in experimental social psychology, Aca- demic Press

48.

Snyder, (1987) The psychology of self-montoring,

49.

Sternberg,R.J.,, (1985) Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication,

50.

Trower, (1978) University of Pittsburgh Press,

51.

Vrij, A. , (1995) Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview,

52.

Vrij, A, (1998) Telling and detecting lies:some future directions in research, Forensic Update

53.

Vrij, A, (2000) Detecting lies and deceit:the psychology of lying and implications for professional practice, John Wiley & Sons.

54.

Vrij, A., & Mann, S, (2001) Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation:the case of a convicted murder.,

55.

Vrij, A, (2004) Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults,

56.

Vrij, A, (2000) Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior,

57.

Wagner, (1986) Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology,

58.

Zuckerman, (1979) Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,

59.

Zuckerman, (1981) Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press

60.

Zuckerman, (1979) Posed and spontaneous communication of emotion via facial and vocal cues Journal of Personality,

61.

Woo Byoung Jhon , Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception, Kyonggi University

62.

male, This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually After separating lie and truth responses to each question the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying,

63.

smiles, There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency high pitch of voice frequency of pauses use of tongues,

64.

smiles, The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying,

65.

smiles, The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying,

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology