바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Investigation of the Relationship Between Aberrant Responses and Personality Sub-factors

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2006, v.20 no.4, pp.115-130


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the types of responser's aberrant responses during personality test interpretation process and identify relationship between aberrant responses and personality sub-factors. In this study, the types of aberrant responses was defined as social desirability, random response, acquiescence, and extreme response. The measure was composed of 'Big 5 personality test', 'social desirability scale', and 'random response scale', which was administerd to 3,051 subjects in 30 universities. And 'acquiescence index' and 'extreme response index' was computed. Based on the analysis of these data, following result are found; in 'self-deception enhancement' and 'image management' on social desirability scale, only self-deception enhancement has shown meaningful relationship extroversion and openness about an experience; only image management has shown meaningful relationship agreeableness; both self-deception enhancement and image management have shown meaningful relationship conscientiousness and emotional instability. Acquiescence tendency has shown positively high correlation with other factors except agreeableness. No meaningful relationship emerged between random response and any other factors. Extreme response has shown positively small correlation with other factors except emotional instability. In a measurement viewpoint, the fact that the balanced scale is very important on the study of acquiescence was found.

keywords

Reference

1.

(2003) 명시적 부정문항과 암묵적 부정문항이 심리척도의 요인구조에 미치는 영향,

2.

(2001) 직업선호도 검사 타당화 연구보고서, 한국산업인력공단 중앙고용정보원

3.

(2005) 사회적 바람직성의 요인 탐색,

4.

(1984) and going to extremes black-white differences in response styles,

5.

(1996) Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs,

6.

(1985) The impact of item phrasing on validity of attitude scale for elementary school children,

7.

(1971186-204) Identification of content and style A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence,

8.

(1964) The structure of personality characteristics,

9.

(1988) Personality in adulthood:A six-yearlongitudinal study of self- reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory,

10.

(1960) agreeing response set as a personality variable Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychol- ogy,

11.

(1982) and implications for adjustment Journal of Research in Personality,

12.

(1946) Response sets and test validity,

13.

(1990) Personality structure:Emergence of the five-factor model,

14.

(1986) Further specification of the five robust factors of personality,

15.

(1957) The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research,

16.

(1981) The search for universals in personality lexicons Review of Personality and Social Psychology,

17.

(1992) Improving Rating Scale Measures by Detecting and Correcting Bias Components in Some Response Styles,

18.

(1998) How to Score to Questionnaire,

19.

(1989180-191) Journal of Research in Personality,

20.

(1985) The instability of response sets,

21.

(1962) Response styles on the MMPI comparison of clinical and normal samples Journal of Abnormal and Social Psy- chology,

22.

(1967) problems of identification and control Response set in personality assessment,

23.

(1997) Acquiescent responding in self-reports cognitive style or social concern?,

24.

(1992) Extreme response style and acquiescence among hispanic the role of acculturation and education Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,

25.

(2000) Variance in faking across noncognitive measures,

26.

(1985) Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and questionnaires Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

27.

(1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

28.

(1996) Person-fit research:An introduction,

29.

(1962) Response style and content measures from personality Inventories,

30.

(1967) The psychological of acquiescence An interpretation of research evidence Response set in personality assessment,

31.

(1991) Psychology and methodology of response styles Improving inquryes in social science,

32.

(1972) An analysis of two response styles:True responding and item endorse- ment,

33.

(1996) Education moderates some response effects in attitude measurement,

34.

(1987) More evidence for the five robust factors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

35.

(1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings,

36.

(1996) Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection,

37.

(1984) Two-component models of socially desirable responding Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

38.

(1998) Paulhus Deception Scales(PDS):The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7 User's Manual, MHS

39.

(2002) Socially desirable responding:The revolution of a construct, Lawrence Erlbaum

40.

(1990) The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale,

41.

(1996) Assessing person-fit on measures of typical performance,

42.

(2001) Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups An IRT analysis of personality scales,

43.

(1978) Advances in research, Plenum Press

44.

personality in educational research,

45.

(1974) Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,

46.

(1998) Person fit and its relationship with other measure of response set Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association,

47.

(2004) Response styles in rating scales evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries,

48.

(1964) Convergences among stylistic response measures from objective personality tests,

49.

(2006) 韓國心理學會誌: 社會 및 性格,

50.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Aberrant Responses and Personality Sub-factors, Ewha Womans University

51.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the types of responser's aberrant responses during personality test interpretation process and identify relationship between aberrant responses and personality sub-factors the types of aberrant responses was defined as social desirability The measure was composed of 'Big 5 personality test' which was administerd to 3 051 subjects in 30 universities,

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology