바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

비전형적 반응과 성격검사 하위요인 간의관계 탐색

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2006, v.20 no.4, pp.115-130
차정은 (이화여자대학교)
김아영 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 자기보고식 성격검사 결과 해석 시 고려해야 하는 반응자들의 비전형적 반응유형들을 파악하고, 이러한 반응유형들과 성격검사 하위요인들과의 관련성을 확인하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 본 연구에서 검토한 비전형적 반응은 사회적 바람직성, 무선반응, 묵종경향성, 극단반응이었다. 전국에 소재한 30개 대학에서 3,051명을 대상으로 ‘5요인 성격검사’와 ‘사회적 바람직성 척도’, ‘무선반응 척도’를 실시하였고, ‘묵종경향성’과 ‘극단반응’ 지수를 계산하였다. 연구결과, ‘자기기만적 고양’과 ‘인상관리’로 구성된 사회적 바람직성의 두 하위척도 점수 중 자기기만적 고양과 관련성을 보인 성격요인은 외향성과 경험에 대한 개방성이었고, 인상관리와 관련성을 보인 요인은 호감성이었으며, 성실성과 정서적 불안정성 요인은 두 하위척도 모두와 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 묵종 경향성은 다른 성격요인들과는 비교적 높은 정적 상관을 보였지만 호감성 요인과는 낮은 상관을 보였다. 무선반응은 어떤 성격요인과도 관련성을 보이지 않았다. 극단반응은 다른 성격요인과는 약한 정적 상관을 보인 반면, 정서적 불안정성과는 거의 관련성이 없었다. 더불어 심리측정학적 측면에서 볼 때, 묵종 경향성에 대한 연구에서는 역채점 문항과 그렇지 않은 문항들 간의 균형을 이루어야 다른 변수들과의 관련성을 정확히 파악할 수 있다는 사실을 확인하였다.

keywords

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the types of responser's aberrant responses during personality test interpretation process and identify relationship between aberrant responses and personality sub-factors. In this study, the types of aberrant responses was defined as social desirability, random response, acquiescence, and extreme response. The measure was composed of 'Big 5 personality test', 'social desirability scale', and 'random response scale', which was administerd to 3,051 subjects in 30 universities. And 'acquiescence index' and 'extreme response index' was computed. Based on the analysis of these data, following result are found; in 'self-deception enhancement' and 'image management' on social desirability scale, only self-deception enhancement has shown meaningful relationship extroversion and openness about an experience; only image management has shown meaningful relationship agreeableness; both self-deception enhancement and image management have shown meaningful relationship conscientiousness and emotional instability. Acquiescence tendency has shown positively high correlation with other factors except agreeableness. No meaningful relationship emerged between random response and any other factors. Extreme response has shown positively small correlation with other factors except emotional instability. In a measurement viewpoint, the fact that the balanced scale is very important on the study of acquiescence was found.

keywords

참고문헌

1.

(2003) 명시적 부정문항과 암묵적 부정문항이 심리척도의 요인구조에 미치는 영향,

2.

(2001) 직업선호도 검사 타당화 연구보고서, 한국산업인력공단 중앙고용정보원

3.

(2005) 사회적 바람직성의 요인 탐색,

4.

(1984) and going to extremes black-white differences in response styles,

5.

(1996) Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs,

6.

(1985) The impact of item phrasing on validity of attitude scale for elementary school children,

7.

(1971186-204) Identification of content and style A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence,

8.

(1964) The structure of personality characteristics,

9.

(1988) Personality in adulthood:A six-yearlongitudinal study of self- reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory,

10.

(1960) agreeing response set as a personality variable Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychol- ogy,

11.

(1982) and implications for adjustment Journal of Research in Personality,

12.

(1946) Response sets and test validity,

13.

(1990) Personality structure:Emergence of the five-factor model,

14.

(1986) Further specification of the five robust factors of personality,

15.

(1957) The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research,

16.

(1981) The search for universals in personality lexicons Review of Personality and Social Psychology,

17.

(1992) Improving Rating Scale Measures by Detecting and Correcting Bias Components in Some Response Styles,

18.

(1998) How to Score to Questionnaire,

19.

(1989180-191) Journal of Research in Personality,

20.

(1985) The instability of response sets,

21.

(1962) Response styles on the MMPI comparison of clinical and normal samples Journal of Abnormal and Social Psy- chology,

22.

(1967) problems of identification and control Response set in personality assessment,

23.

(1997) Acquiescent responding in self-reports cognitive style or social concern?,

24.

(1992) Extreme response style and acquiescence among hispanic the role of acculturation and education Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,

25.

(2000) Variance in faking across noncognitive measures,

26.

(1985) Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and questionnaires Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

27.

(1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

28.

(1996) Person-fit research:An introduction,

29.

(1962) Response style and content measures from personality Inventories,

30.

(1967) The psychological of acquiescence An interpretation of research evidence Response set in personality assessment,

31.

(1991) Psychology and methodology of response styles Improving inquryes in social science,

32.

(1972) An analysis of two response styles:True responding and item endorse- ment,

33.

(1996) Education moderates some response effects in attitude measurement,

34.

(1987) More evidence for the five robust factors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

35.

(1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings,

36.

(1996) Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection,

37.

(1984) Two-component models of socially desirable responding Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

38.

(1998) Paulhus Deception Scales(PDS):The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7 User's Manual, MHS

39.

(2002) Socially desirable responding:The revolution of a construct, Lawrence Erlbaum

40.

(1990) The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale,

41.

(1996) Assessing person-fit on measures of typical performance,

42.

(2001) Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups An IRT analysis of personality scales,

43.

(1978) Advances in research, Plenum Press

44.

personality in educational research,

45.

(1974) Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,

46.

(1998) Person fit and its relationship with other measure of response set Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association,

47.

(2004) Response styles in rating scales evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries,

48.

(1964) Convergences among stylistic response measures from objective personality tests,

49.

(2006) 韓國心理學會誌: 社會 및 性格,

50.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Aberrant Responses and Personality Sub-factors, Ewha Womans University

51.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the types of responser's aberrant responses during personality test interpretation process and identify relationship between aberrant responses and personality sub-factors the types of aberrant responses was defined as social desirability The measure was composed of 'Big 5 personality test' which was administerd to 3 051 subjects in 30 universities,

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격