바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

Exploration of legal dispositions forrisk types of sex offenders

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.3, pp.117-131
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.3.008


& (2007). Exploration of legal dispositions forrisk types of sex offenders. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 21(3), 117-131, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.3.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The pattern of sex offences is getting more serious today in S. Korea. Analyzing the characteristics of sex offences, there are many types of sex offenders. So when legal dispositions is applied, subtypes of sex offenders need to be regarded as important matter. But legal dispositions discussed nowadays have not considered importantly the subtypes of sex offenders. This study was attempted to classify subtypes of sex offenders based on legal, psychological and psychiatric classifications. Understanding of subtypes of sex offenders will help Ministry of Justice applying various legal dispositions properly to sex offenders. Currently Ministry of Justice applies incarceration and probation to sex offenders as most usual form of dispositions. However, electronic monitoring and forensic psychiatric hospitalization for sex offenders will be applied additionally since the traditional dispositions were not strong enough. If legal dispositions for sex offenders became various, individualized dispositions could be applied for sex offenders with consideration of their risk types. This study therefore explored applicability of dynamic system for various legal dispositions with considering characteristics of sex offenders.

keywords
Types of Sex offenders, High risk group, Low risk group, Legal dispositions, Types of Sex offenders, High risk group, Low risk group, Legal dispositions, 성범죄자 유형, 고위험군, 저위험군, 처우 방안

Reference

1.

고선영, 양종희, 이수정 (2004). “성폭력 범죄의 원인과 개입전략에 대한 고찰”. 한국심리학회지：사회문제, 10(특집호), 117-146.

2.

국가청소년위원회 홈페이지. http：//www.youth.go.kr

3.

경찰청 (2004). 경찰백서.

4.

법무부 보호국 (2007). “미국의 성폭력 범죄자 치료프로그램의 실태연구”.

5.

법무부 보호국 (2006). 정책위원회 3차 회의 자료. 미출판 자료.

6.

법무부 (2006). 보호관찰통계연보.

7.

법무부 홈페이지. http：//www.moi.go.kr

8.

신준섭, 이영분 (2004). “청소년 대상 성범죄자 신상공개제도의 효과성 분석”. 한국아동복지학, 18호, 35-61.

9.

윤가현 (2006). “성범죄의 심리학적 접근”. 한국심리학회 심포지엄, 11-22.

10.

여의도연구소 (2005). 성범죄자 전자위치확인제도 도입방안 자료집.

11.

이수정 (2006). 최신범죄심리학. 북카페.

12.

이수정 (2006). 고위험 성범죄로부터 사회보호를 위한 대안 모색. 한국심리학회, 법무부, 여성가족부, 국가청소년위원회 공동주최 학술발표대회 발표논문집, 52-66.

13.

이수정, 김경옥 (2005). “성범죄 재범율에 관한 바른 이해와 재범 방지 대안 모색”. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 3(19), 83-99.

14.

한국일보. 2006년 6월 22일자 기사.

15.

한국청소년상담원 (2007). “청소년성범죄자 인지행동치료전문가 양성교육 자료집”.

16.

SBS 2006년 6월 19일자 8시 뉴스자료.

17.

YTN 2006년 6월 19일자 뉴스자료.

18.

Abrams, S., & Ogard, E. (1986). Polygraph surveillance of probationers. Polygraph, 15, 174-182.

19.

Ahlmeyer, S., Heil, M., Mckee, B., & English, K. (2000). The impact of polygraph on admissions of victims and offence in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 123- 138.

20.

Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in Focible Rape, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Burgess, A., & Holmstrom, L. (1974). Rape: Victim of crisis. Maryland: Bowie, Md. : R.J. Brady Co.

22.

Wilcox, D. R., & Sosnowski, D. E. (2005). Poly- graph examination of British sexual offenders: A pilot study on sexual history disclosure testing. Journal of Aggression, 11(1), 3-25.

23.

Dietz, P. E., Hazelwood, M. S., & Warren, D. S. W. (1990). The sexually sadistic criminal and his offences. Bulletin of American Academy of psychiatry and the Law, 16, 163-178.

24.

Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom. L. (1977). Rape, power, anger and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239-1248.

25.

Hanson, R. K. (1997). The Development of a Brief actu- arial Risk Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism (Document No.1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Solicitor General Canada.

26.

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist- Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health System. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy- chology, 53, 7-16.

27.

Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R, K., & Thornton. D. (2003). Static-99 Coding Rules. Ottawa, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.

28.

Kendall, W., & Cheung, M. (2004). Theoretical reviews and policy issues: Sexually violent predator and civil commitment laws. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(2), 41-57.

29.

Lafond, J. Q. (2004). Preventing Sexual Violence: How Society should cope with sex offender. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

30.

Looman, J., Abracen, J., Serin, R., & Marquis, P. (2005). Psychopathy, Treatment Change, and Recidivism in High-Risk, High-Need Sexual Offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 549-568.

31.

Pfaffenroth, P. C. (2003). The Need for Coherence: State Civil Commitment of Sex Offender in the Wake of Kansas v. Crane. Stanford Law Review, 55, 2229-2266.

32.

Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T., Cormier. C. A. (1998). Violent Offenders Appraising And Man- aging Risk. Washington, DC: American Psycho- logical Association.

33.

The State of Texas (2006). Rules and regulations relating to council on sex offender treatment.

34.

Wilcox, D. T., & Sosnowski, D. E. (2000). Polygraph examination of British sexual offenders: A pilot study on sexual history disclosure testing. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1(11), 3-25.

35.

Wilcox, D. T., Sosnowski, D. E., & Middleeton, D. (2000). Polygraph and the community management of sex offenders. Forensic Update British Psycho- logical Society, 61, 20-25.

36.

Winick, B. J., & La Fond, J. Q. (2003). Protecting Society From Sexually Dangerous Offenders. Washington, DC; American Psychological Association.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy