바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.2

Citation Share

A Study on the Socio-relational Meanings of Money

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2009, v.23 no.2, pp.1-12
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.2.001



& (2009). A Study on the Socio-relational Meanings of Money. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 23(2), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.2.001

Abstract

The present study examined if socio-relational meanings of money were different depending on payment form. We presented various scenarios of paying and receiving money and asked participants to choose either cash or check and to write down reasons for their choice. In study 1, participants were undergraduate students and they preferred paying check because check delivered the socio-relational meanings to recipients. This result suggests that the meanings such as social formality, respect, and sincerity are better conveyed by check, especially in the paying situations. In study 2, participants were white collar workers and the results were different from those of study 1. Contrary to the undergraduate students, the workers preferred paying cash because cash delivered the socio-relational meanings to recipients. This suggests that workers confer the socio-relational meanings to cash. The opposite results seem to come from different usage experiences of cash and check between the two groups.

keywords
돈의 형태, 현금, 수표, 돈의 사회관계적 의미, payment form, cash, check, socio-relational meaning of money, payment form, cash, check, socio-relational meaning of money

Reference

1.

Burgoyne, C. B., & Routh, D. A. (1991). Constraints on the use of money as a gift at Christmas：The role of status and intimacy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(1), 47-69.

2.

Caplow, T. (1982). Christmas gifts and kin networks. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 383-392.

3.

Cole, C. (1998). Identifying interventions to reduce credit card misuse through consumer behavior research. In Proceedings of the Marketing and Public Policy Conference, Washington, DC：Georgetown Uni- versity.

4.

Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998), The Psychology of Money, Routledge, London.

5.

Goldberg, H., & Lewis, R. (1978). Money madness：The psychology of saving, spending, loving, and hating money. London：Springwood.

6.

Lea, S. E. G., Tarpy, R. M., & Webley, P. (1987). The individual in the economy. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.

7.

Mishra H., Mishra, A., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2006). Money：A bias for the whole. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 541-549.

8.

Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money：The effect of payment coupling and form on spend- ing behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Applied, 14(3), 213-225.

9.

Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior：The role of rehearsal and imme- diacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 460-474.

10.

Teigen, K. H., Olsen, M. V. G., & Solas, O. E. (2005). Giver-receiver asymmetries in gift preferences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 125-144.

11.

Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). Psychological consequences of money, Science, 314, 1154-1156.

12.

Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The social meaning of money：“special monies”. The American Journal of Soci- ology, 95(2), 342-377.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy