바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.2

Citation Share

역경 극복을 돕는 성인 한국인의 긍정성 탐색： 긍정적 태도 척도 개발과 타당화

Exploring the Components of Positivity among Adult Koreans： Development and Validation of a Positive Attitude Scale

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2009, v.23 no.2, pp.13-42
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.2.002
현경자 (우리사회복지연구소)
현경자. (2009). 역경 극복을 돕는 성인 한국인의 긍정성 탐색： 긍정적 태도 척도 개발과 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(2), 13-42, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.2.002

초록

이 연구는 역경에서나 일상생활에서 도움이 되는 성인 한국인의 긍정성을 탐색하고 그 구성개념에 따라 긍정적 태도 척도를 개발하여 타당화 작업을 시도하였다. 본 연구에서는 개인의 긍정성을 자신과 자기가 속한 사회를 다각도로 살펴 긍정적 측면에 주목하고 의미를 부여하는 인식성향과 그에 따른 긍정적 태도로 규정하였다. 한국인의 긍정성은 긍정적 관점, 자기긍정성, 사회긍정성으로 구분될 수 있고, 구체적으로 긍정적 시각을 촉진하는 관점의 다각화, 자기수용, 자기소신, 자기조절, 사회적응, 사회수용과 같은 특성을 보일 것으로 가정하였다. 이론추출 방식과 경험적 연구결과를 토대로 척도문항들을 선정하였으며, 서울과 대구지역의 대학생 373명과 일반 성인 401명을 대상으로 요인분석을 실시한 결과 이론적 예측과 일관되게 6개 요인이 추출되었다. 하지만 이중 자기소신 요인은 해당 문항들에서 타 요인에 중복 부하된 것이 많이 있었고, 확인적 요인분석을 통해 5요인의 적합도가 6요인보다 우수하게 나타나 요인의 순수성과 척도의 간명성을 위해 제작과정에서 제외되었다. 최종적으로 긍정적 태도 척도는 긍정관점 요인 1개(다각화), 자기긍정성 요인 2개(자기수용, 자기조절), 사회긍정성 요인 2개(사회적응, 사회수용)로 구성되었다. 제작된 척도의 구성타당도, 내적합치도 및 구인, 예측, 증분 측면에서의 타당도는 적절하게 나타났다. 예측대로 이 척도는 자존감, 희망감 등의 긍정적인 자기특성 변수들과 유의미한 정적 상관을 보였고, 심리사회적 안녕 변수들과도 유의미한 상관을 나타냈으며, 긍정적 정서 및 스트레스 관련 변수들에 대한 자존감의 효과를 통제하고도 긍정적 태도의 설명력이 유의미하게 증가됨을 보여주었다. 끝으로 본 연구의 이론적, 임상적 의의와 제한점, 후속연구 방향을 제언하였다.

keywords
positive psychology, positive attitude, taking multiple perspectives, self positivity, self-acceptance, self-control, self-esteem, social positivity, social adaptation, acceptance of society, scale development, 긍정심리, 긍정적 관점, 자기긍정성, 사회긍정성, 관점 다각화, 사회적응, 사회수용, 자기수용, 자기조절, 자기존중감, 희망감, 긍정적 태도 척도, 타당도

Abstract

This study explored the components of positivity that help adult Koreans maintain a positive attitude toward the self and the society. Taking multiple perspectives was conceptualized as a core characteristic of positivity that enables one to find meanings in and/or to create meanings for the self and the society in which one lives. Thus positive cognitive tendencies such as taking multiple perspectives were hypothesized to promote self-acceptance, self-belief, self-control, adaptation to and acceptance of the society. Based on these conceptualizations of individuals' positivity, preliminary scale items were constructed, and development and validation of a positive attitude scale was attempted, using 352 college students and 401 adults. As expected, results of exploratory factor analyses revealed 6 factors, which were named as multiple perspectives, self-acceptance, self-belief, self-control, social adaptation, and acceptance of society. Among these factors, however, self-belief factor was excluded because its items were found to be loaded with other factors as well, and because results of confirmatory factor analyses supported 5 factors model better than the other one. The final 5 factor scale was found to be reliable in terms of internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and to be significantly correlated with similar positive traits of the self as well as with psychosocial well-being variables in an expected direction, suggesting that the scale has good construct and predictive validity. As for incremental validity, positive attitude scale augmented prediction of positive emotion and stress-related reactions beyond a self-esteem measure. Finally, implications and limitations of this study were discussed, and future directions for this line of research were suggested.

keywords
positive psychology, positive attitude, taking multiple perspectives, self positivity, self-acceptance, self-control, self-esteem, social positivity, social adaptation, acceptance of society, scale development, 긍정심리, 긍정적 관점, 자기긍정성, 사회긍정성, 관점 다각화, 사회적응, 사회수용, 자기수용, 자기조절, 자기존중감, 희망감, 긍정적 태도 척도, 타당도

참고문헌

1.

김동직, 한성열 (1998). 개별성-관계성 척도의 제작과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 12(1), 71-93.

2.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석：한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

3.

박병기, 홍승표 (2004). 주관적 안녕 척도의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 18(3), 159-175.

4.

박선영 (2008). 배우자폭력 여성 피해자의 긍정성과 역기능성에 대한 해결중심 개별상담의 효과연구. 한국가족복지학, 13(3), 5-27.

5.

이홍철 (1994). 정서상태가 기억수행 및 주의편향에 미치는 효과. 고려대학교 박사학위청구논문.

6.

조긍호 (2003). 한국인 이해의 개념 틀. 서울：나남출판.

7.

조혜자, 방희정 (1998). 사회경제적 변화가 가족에게 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지：여성, 3(1), 1-16.

8.

차경호, 홍기원, 김명소, 한영석 (2006). 한국 성인의 자존감 구성요인 탐색 및 척도개발. 한국심리학회지：일반, 25(1), 105-139.

9.

최상진 (2000). 한국인 심리학. 서울：중앙대학교 출판부.

10.

한유화, 정진경 (2007). 2요인 자아존중감 척도：개인주의적 및 집단주의적 요인. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 21(4), 117-131.

11.

현경자 (2004). 기혼남녀의 자기관과 결혼만족의 관계：독립 및 상호의존적 자기관을 중심으로. 한국사회복지학, 56(4), 239-268.

12.

현경자 (2008). 저소득층 부부들의 경제적 스트레스와 부부갈등 및 결혼결과：탄력적 대응을 돕는 기혼자의 자기해석. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 22(3), 49-79.

13.

Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. In L. Porter & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology(Vol.45, pp. 297-332). Palo Alto, CA：Annual Reviews, Inc.

14.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy：Toward a unifying theory of behavioral exchange. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

15.

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske., & G. Lindzey(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol.1, pp.680-740). Boston, MA：McGraw Hill.

16.

Brockner, J. (1984). Low self-esteem and behavior plasticity：Some implications for personality and social psychology. In L. Wheeler(Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, (Vol.4, pp.237- 271). Beverly Hills, CA：SAGE Publications, Inc.

17.

Brown, J., & Langer, E. (1990). Mindfulness and intelligence：A comparison. Educational Psycholo- gist, 25(3-4), 305-335.

18.

Brown, L., & Alexander, J. (1991). Self-esteem index. Austin, TX：Pro-Ed.

19.

Burpee, L. C., & Langer, E. J. (2005). Mindfulness and marital satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development, 12(1), 43-51.

20.

Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression ques- tionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 63, 452-459.

21.

Byrne, R. (2006). The secret. New York：Atria Books/ Beyond Words.

22.

Carson, S. H., & Langer, E. J. (2006). Mindfulness and self-acceptance. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 4(1), 29-43.

23.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation：A control theory approach to human behavior. New York：Springer-Verlag.

24.

Crocker, J., & Park, L. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392-414.

25.

Crown, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 4, 349-354.

26.

DeJong, P., & Berg, K. I. S. (2002). Interviewing for solutions(2nd ed.). New York：Brooks/Cole.

27.

DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood：Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 486-495.

28.

Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90(Revised) manual I. Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit. Baltimore：Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine.

29.

DeVellis, R. (1991). Scale development：Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA：SAGE Publica- tions, Inc.

30.

Fischer, J., & Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice：A source book (2nd ed., Vol.2). New York：The Free Press.

31.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3, 1-24.

32.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum.

33.

Harter, S. (1986). The determinant and mediational role of global self-worth in the children. In P. Eisenberg (Ed.), Contemporary topic of developmental psy- chology(pp.219-224). New York：Wiley.

34.

Heine, S., Lehman, D., Markus, H., & Kitayama, S.(1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.

35.

Higgins, E. (1987). Self-discrepancy：A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.

36.

Higgins, E. (1996). The “self-digest”：Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.

37.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis：Conven- tional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

38.

Hyun, K. J. (1995). Culture and the self：Implications for Koreans' mental health. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

39.

Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). The job satisfaction- job performance relationship：A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 87(4), 765-780.

40.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.

41.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York：Guilford Press.

42.

Langer, E. J. (1992). Matters of mind：Mindfulness/ mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition：An International Journal, 1(4), 289-305.

43.

Langer, E. J. (2000). Mindful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 220-223.

44.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self：Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

45.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept：Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 77-172.

46.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.

47.

Osteen, J. (2005). Your best life now. New York：Warner Faith.

48.

Raykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging：Some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 499-503.

49.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self- image. Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press.

50.

Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York：Basic Books.

51.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well- being. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 57, 1069-1081.

52.

Ryff, C. D. (1991). Possible selves in adulthood and old age：A tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6(2), 286-295.

53.

Scheier, M. F., Fenigstein, A., & Buss, A. H. (1974). Self-awareness and physical aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 264-273.

54.

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985a). Optimism, coping, and health：Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psy- chology, 4, 219-247.

55.

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985b). The self- consciousness scale：A revised version for use with the general population. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 687-699.

56.

Seligman, M. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New York：Knopf.

57.

Seligman, M. P. (2002). Authentic happiness：Using the new psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York：Arthur Pine Associates, Inc.

58.

Snyder, C., Harris, C., Anderson, J., Holleran, S., Irving, L., Sigmon, S., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways：Development and validation of an individual differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585.

59.

Snyder, C., Sympson, S., Ybasco, F., Borders, T., Babyak, M., & Higgins, R. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321- 335.

60.

Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation：Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.21, pp.261-302). New York：Academic Press.

61.

Tafarodi, R. W., & Swan, W. B., Jr. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem：Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 322-342.

62.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being：A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

63.

Walsh, F. (1998). Strengthening family resilience. New York：Guilford Press.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책