바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

자기개념 복잡성과 심리적 적응 관계에서의 인지적 유연성 및 자기개념 명확성의 매개효과 모형 검증

The Relation between Self-Complexity and Subjective Well-being Throughout Cognitive Flexibility and Self-concept Clarity

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2009, v.23 no.3, pp.73-88
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.3.005
송보라 (연세대학교)
이기학 (연세대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether self-complexity predicted psychological adjustment. Cognitive flexibility and self-concept clarity were hypothesized as factors that mediate this process. A total of 200 undergraduate students at a university in Seoul, South Korea participated the study and completed a packet of questionnaires including self-complexity, self-concept clarity, cognitive flexibility, subjective well-being, and perceived stress. Structural equation modeling indicated that there were the partial mediating effect of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between self-complexity and self-concept clarity. In addition, findings indicated support for the hypothesis that this partial mediating process showed an increase in psychological adjustment.

keywords
자기개념 복잡성, 자기개념 명확성, 인지적 유연성, 주관적 안녕감, 지각된 스트레스, self-complexity, self-concept clarity, cognitive flexibility, subjective well-being, perceived stress

참고문헌

1.

김완일 (2008). 자기복잡성과 인지적 유연성이 심리적적응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 20(3), 715-734.

2.

안신능 (2006). 자기개념에 따른 자기불일치와 삶의 만족도의 인과적 관계. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

3.

이수현 (2005). 자기복잡성과 자기개념 명료성이 심리적 적응에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

4.

이정은 (2006). 자기복잡성과 자기효능감이 우울과 지각된 스트레스에 미치는 영향. 아주대학교 대학원석사학위 논문.

5.

조용래 (1999). 역기능적 신념과 사회공포증상간의 관계에서 부적응적인 자동적 사고의 매개효과 검증.한국심리학회지: 임상, 18(1), 17-36.

6.

홍숙지 (2005). 개인 유연성 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

7.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

8.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

9.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). New bury Park CA: Sage.

10.

Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538-549.

11.

Campbell, J. D., Assanand, S. & Paula A. (2003). The structure of the self-concept and its relation to psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71, 115-140.

12.

Campbell, J. D., Chew, B., & Scatchley, L. (1991). Cognitive and emotional reactions to daily events: The effects of self-esteem and self-complexity, Journal of Personality, 59, 473-505.

13.

Cohen, S., & Williamson G. M. (2000). Stress and infectious disease in humans

14.

Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141.

15.

Dixon, T. M. & Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Escaping the self: Moderating effects of self-complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 4-12.

16.

Donahue, E. M., Robinson R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O.P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64. 834-846.

17.

Gara, M. A., Woolfolk, R. L., Cohen, B. D., Goldstone, R. B., Allen, L. A., & Novalany, J. (1993). Perception of self and other in major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 93-100.

18.

Gergen, K. J. (1971). The concept of self. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

19.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

20.

Helson, R., Elliot, T., & Leigh, J. (1990). Number and quality of roles: A longitudinal personality view. Psychology of women quarterly, 14, 83-101.

21.

Hershberger, P. (1990). Self-complexity and health promotion Promising but premature. Psychological Reports, 66, 1207-1216.

22.

Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward Terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literature. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610.

23.

James, W. (1948). Psychology. New York: World.(Original work published 1890).

24.

Jordan, A. & Cole, D. A. (1996). Relation of depressive symptom to the structure of self-knowledge in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 530-540.

25.

Lecky, P. (1945). Self-consistency: A theory of personality. New York: Anchor Books.

26.

Linville. P. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663-676.

27.

Marcia, J. A. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: Wiley.

28.

Markus, H. (1990). Unsolved issues of self-representation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 241-253.

29.

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.

30.

Marsh, H. W.. Relich, J. D., & Smith, I. D. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.

31.

Martin M. M. & Rubin R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626.

32.

McConnell, A. R., Remaud, J. M., Deab, K. K., Green, S. P., Lamoreaux, M. J., Hall, C. E., & Rydell, R. J. (2005). Whose self is it anyway? self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 1-18.

33.

Morgan, H. J., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1994). Positive and negative self-complexity: Pattern of adjustment following traumatic versus non-traumatic life experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 63-85.

34.

Paulhus D. L. & Martin C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88-101.

35.

Rafaeli-Mor, E. & Steinberg, J. (2002). Self-complexity and well-being: A review and Research Synthesis. Personal and Social Psychology Review, 1, 106-128.

36.

Renaud, J. M., & McConnell, A. R. (2002). Organization of the self-concept and the suppression of self-relevant thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 79-86.

37.

Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch(Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 1-59). New York: McGraw-Hill.

38.

Schroeder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

39.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

40.

Smith, S. H. & Cohen, L. H. (1993). Self-complexity and reactions to a relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 12, 367-384.

41.

Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1986 (pp. 159-186). Washington, DC: American sociological association.

42.

Suh, E. M., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgements across cultures: Emotion versus norms. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 482-493.

43.

Thurston B. J. & Runco M. A. (1999). Flexibility. In Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, 1, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 729-732.

44.

Woolfolk, R. L., Novalany, J., Gara, M. A., Allen, L. A., & Polino, M. (1995). Self-compexity, self-evaluation and depression: An examination of form and content within the self-schema. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1108-1120.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격