바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Effects of Rapport on the Amount of Statements in Investigative Interviewing

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.1, pp.149-166
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.1.010



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study explored the effects of rapport on the amount of statements in investigative interviewing. Independent variables were time in establishing the rapport, rapport groups were divided into 4 group(0, 5, 10, 15 minutes group). Dependent variables were amount of correct, incorrect, and total(correct+incorrect) informations in statements of the participants. In order to make participants conducted both suspect and witness' roles, we set particular situation that computer got froze when participants were typing chinese character text which is not familiar to the students in Korea. Interviewer was establishing rapport for each group and conducting same standard interview to elicit the participant's voluntary statements. Participants were self-reported the strengths of comfortableness of the before and after rapport treatment. Participants were 89 undergraduate students of K university in Kyonggi. 3 rapport groups reported significantly more correct, total informations than no rapport group, but four groups were not significantly different in incorrect information reporting. And 15 minutes rapport group reported significantly more correct, total informations than 5 minutes rapport group. Implications of investigative practice, limitations of study, directions for future research were discussed

keywords
라포, 수사면담, 진술, 정확정보, 총정보, rapport, investigative interviewing, amount of statements

Reference

1.

Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Ericson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The Social Consequences of Expressive Suppression. Emotion, 3: 48-67.

2.

Ceci, S. J., Toglia, M. P., & Ross, D. F. (1990). The suggestibility of preschooler‘s recollections; Historical perspectives on current problems. In R. Fivush & J. A. Judon (Eds), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 285-300). New York Cambridge University Press.

3.

Collins, N. L. & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475.

4.

Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The Effect of Rapport in Forensic Interviewing, Psychiatry. Psychology and the Law, 9(1), 69-78.

5.

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cataolog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

6.

Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing. The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, I.L: Charles C. Thomas.

7.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A.., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-80.

8.

Holmberg, U. & Christianson, S. A. (2002). Murders and Sexual Offenders Experiences of Police Interviews and their Inclination to Admit of Deny Crime. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 20: 31-45.

9.

Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). The Cognitive Interview: A Survey of its Forensic Effectiveness. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5: 101-115.

10.

LeDoux, J. C. & Hazelwood, R. R. (1985). Police Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Rape, Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13: 211-220.

11.

Lieberman, P. (2000). Human Laguage and our reptilian brain: The subcortical bases of speech, syntax and thought. Cambridge, M. A.: Harvard University Press.

12.

Milne, R., Clare, I. H., & Bull, R. (1999). Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 81-99.

13.

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewiell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

14.

Pearse, J. & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). Police Interviewing Techniques at Two South London Police Stations. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3: 63-74.

15.

Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 2-10.

16.

Salhany, R. E. (2002). The Police Manual of Arrest, Seizure & Interrogation (8th). Toronto: Thomson Carswell.

17.

Schafer, J. R. & Navarro, J. (2003). Advanced Interviewing Techniques. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

18.

Sear, L. & Stephenson, G. M. (1997). Interviewing Skills and Individual Characteristics of Police Interrogators. Issues in Criminology and Legal Psychology, 29: 27-34.

19.

Shepherd, E. (1991). Ethical Interviewing. Policing, 7: 42-60.

20.

Shepherd, E. & Milne, R. (1999). Full and Faithful: Ensuring Quality Practice and Integrity of Outcomes in Witness Interviewing. in A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd and D. Wolchover (eds), Analysing Witness Testimony: A Guide for Legal Practitioners and Other Prfessionals. London: Blackston Press, 124-145.

21.

Shepherd, E., Mortimer, A., Turner, V., & Watson, J. (1999). Spaced Cognitive Interviewing: Facilitating Therapeutic and Forensic Narration of Trauma Memories. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5: 117-143.

22.

Stephenson, G. M. & Moston, S. J. (1994). Police Interrogation, Psychology, Crime and Law, 1: 151-157.

23.

Teigen, K. H. (1994). Yerkes-Dodson: A law for all seasons. Theory and Psychology, 4, 525-547.

24.

Tickle-Degnen, L. & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlated. Psychological Inquiry, 4: 285-293.

25.

Timothy J. T. (2005). 임상심리학 {Clinical Psychology}. 권정혜, 강연욱, 이훈진, 김은정, 정경미 역(2008). 서울: 시그마프레스.

26.

Zulawski, D. E., Wicklander, D., & Geberth, V. J. (1993). Practical Aspects of Interview and Interrogation. New York, NY: CRC Press ‘The Police Manual of Arrest, Seizure & Interrogation’

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology