바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

집단에서 신입 성원의 변화 시도: 신입 성원의 상호작용 지향성 및 집단구성 변화 특성의 효과

When Do Newcomers Introduce Changes in Groups?: Effects of Newcomers' Interaction Orientation and the Nature of Membership Change

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.3, pp.1-15
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.3.001
최훈석 (성균관대학교)
이지현 (성균관대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

집단에서 신입 성원의 상호작용 지향성과 집단구성 변화의 특성에 따라서 신입 성원이 집단에서 새로운 과제수행 전략을 제안하는 행동이 달리 나타나리라고 가정하고 이를 실험 연구를 통해서 검증했다. 신입 성원의 상호작용 지향성은 새로 가입한 집단에서 협동과 조화를 추구하도록 유도함으로써 협동을 점화하거나, 경쟁과 차별화를 추구하도록 유도함으로써 경쟁을 점화하여 조작했다. 집단구성 변화 특성은 특정 구성원이 영구적으로 집단 소속을 바꾸어 새로운 집단에 가입하거나 또는 일시적으로 다른 집단에 소속되도록 집단의 인적 구성에 변화를 유발하여 조작했다. 실험 결과, 가설과 일관되게 영구적 집단구성 변화 조건에서는 신입 성원의 과제수행 전략 제안에 있어서 신입 성원의 상호작용 지향성에 따른 차이가 없었다. 반면에, 집단구성 변화가 일시적으로 발생했을 때는 경쟁이 점화된 신입 성원들이 협동이 점화된 신입 성원들보다 새로운 과제수행 전략을 제안하는 빈도가 높았다. 본 연구의 시사점과 제한점, 및 장래 연구 방향을 논의했다.

keywords
composition change in groups, interaction orientation, innovation by newcomers, 집단구성 변화, 상호작용 지향성, 신입 성원에 의한 혁신

Abstract

The present study investigated a joint impact of a newcomer's interaction orientation and the nature of membership change upon the likelihood that the newcomer introduces changes in group task strategy. Participants were randomly assembled into 3-person teams and performed a construction task as a team. Newcomers' interaction orientation was manipulated by priming either cooperation or competition prior to joining a new team. The nature of membership change was varied by introducing either a temporary or a permanent change in team composition. It was predicted that, regardless of their interaction orientation, newcomers would be less likely to propose a new task strategy in the permanent change condition due to a high need for assimilation to the group. In contrast, it was predicted that when membership change is temporary, newcomers would be more likely to propose a new task strategy when competition is primed than when cooperation is primed. The study found supportive evidence for the hypothesized interaction effect. Implications of the findings and suggestions for future studies are discussed.

keywords
composition change in groups, interaction orientation, innovation by newcomers, 집단구성 변화, 상호작용 지향성, 신입 성원에 의한 혁신

참고문헌

1.

Arrow, H., Henry, K. B., Poole, M. S., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2005). Traces, trajectories, and timing: The temporal perspective on groups. In M. S. Poole & A. B. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives(pp. 313-368). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.

2.

Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In D. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizatinal behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

3.

Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-214.

4.

Bauer, T. N. Morrison, E. W., & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 149-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

5.

Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., Choi, H-S. (in press). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

6.

Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Social motives in integrative negotiation: The mediating influence of procedural fairness. Social Justice Research, 16, 217-239.

7.

Choi, H-S. (2007). Impact of membership change on group creativity. Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research. Lansing, Michigan.

8.

Choi, H-S., & Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.

9.

Choi, H-S., & Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 121-132.

10.

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 2, 239-290.

11.

De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.

12.

De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwan, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes. 78. 889-905.

13.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.

14.

Deutsch, M. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In M. Deutsch & P. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 21-40). San Francisco, : Jossyey-Bass.

15.

Feij, J. A., Whitely, W. T., Peiró, J. M., & Taris, T. W. (1995). The development of career-enhancing strategies and content innovation: A longitudinal study of new workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 231-256.

16.

Feldman, D. C. (1994). Who’s socializing whom? The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders, work groups, and organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 4, 213-233.

17.

Gruenfeld, D. H., & Fan, E. T. (1999). What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Gruenfeld, D. H., & Martorana, P. V., & Fan, E. (2000). What do groups learn from their worldliest members; Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 45-49.

19.

Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Fundamental consideration about work groups. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp.3-21). Chichester, England: Wiley.

20.

Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don't work. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245-267). New York: Plenum.

21.

Hansen, T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Newcomers as change agents: Effects of newcomers' behavioral style and teams' performane optimism. Social Influence, 4, 46-61.

22.

Hogg, M., & Tindale, S. (2001). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

23.

Ilgen, D. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.

24.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.

25.

Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56-71.

26.

Kerr, N. L. & Park, E. (2001). Group performance in collaborative and social dilemma tasks: Progress and prospects. In M. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Process (pp. 107-138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

27.

Levine, J. M., & Choi, H-S. (2004). Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore. (Eds). Team Cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington D. C: American Psychology Association.

28.

Levine, J. M., & Choi, H-S. (2010). Minority influence in small groups: The impact of newcomers. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 229-262). New York: Psychology Press.

29.

Levine, J. M., Choi, H-S., & Moreland, R. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

30.

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Innovation and socialization in small groups. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectivies on minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. European Reviewof social psychology, 305-336.

32.

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4thed., pp. 415-469). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

33.

Levine, J. M., & Thompson, L. (1996). Conflict in groups. In E. T Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 745-776). New York: Guilford.

34.

McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105.

35.

Messick, D. M., &McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.

36.

Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small group: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic press.

37.

Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In E. Lawer, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAL.

38.

Poole, M. S., & Hollingshead, A. B. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.

39.

Rink, F. A., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Temporary versus permanent group membership: How the future prospects of newcomers affect newcomer acceptance and newcomer influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 764-775.

40.

Sundstrom, E. (1999). Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Ten Velden, F. S., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Majority and minority influence in group negotiation: The moderating effects of social motivation and decision rules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 259-268.

42.

Ziller, R. C., &Behringer, R. D. (1960). R. D. (1960). Assimilation of the knowledgeable newcomer under conditions of group success and failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 288-291.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격